4-13-2005

5000

Re: Cynthia Acosta v. AHP (02-20143)

AND NOW TO WIT: This 13^{th day of April, 2005, it having been reported that the issues between the parties have been settled with respect to plaintiff Ruby Merrick in the above-captioned action, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby}

^{ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Ruby Merrick in the above-captioned action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.}

^4-13-2005

⁵⁰⁰¹

^{Re: Cynthia Acosta v. AHP (02-20143)}

^{AND NOW TO WIT: This 13th day of April, 2005, it having been reported that the issues between the parties have been settled with respect to plaintiff Elsie Daniels in the above-captioned action, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby}

^{ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Elsie Daniels in the above-captioned action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.}

^4-13-2005

⁵⁰⁰²

^{Re: Cynthia Acosta v. AHP (02-20143)}

^{AND NOW TO WIT: This 13th day of April, 2005, it having been reported that the issues between the parties have been settled with respect to plaintiff Barbara Boyle in the above-captioned action, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby}

^{ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Barbara Boyle in the above-captioned action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.}

^4-13-2005

⁵⁰⁰³

^{Re: Cynthia Acosta v. AHP (02-20143)}

^{AND NOW TO WIT: This 13th day of April, 2005, it having been reported that the issues between the parties have been settled with respect to plaintiff Morris Lewis in the above-captioned action, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby}

^{ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Morris Lewis in the above-captioned action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.}

^4-13-2005

⁵⁰⁰⁴

^{Re: Cynthia Acosta v. AHP (02-20143)}

^{AND NOW TO WIT: This 13th day of April, 2005, it having been reported that the issues between the parties have been settled with respect to plaintiff Elizabeth Guillote in the above-captioned action, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby}

^{ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Elizabeth Guillote in the above-captioned action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.}

^4-13-2005

⁵⁰⁰⁵

^{Re: Cynthia Acosta v. AHP (02-20143)}

^{AND NOW TO WIT: This 13th day of April, 2005, it having been reported that the issues between the parties have been settled with respect to plaintiff Bianca Doubleday in the above-captioned action, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby}

^{ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Bianca Doubleday in the above-captioned action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.}

^4-15-2005

⁵⁰⁰⁶

^{Re: Alberta Roy v. Wyeth (04-26970)}

^{AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motions of the following defendants to dismiss the claims against them on th ground that they are fraudulently joined are GRANTED: Merle Pounds, M.D. (Doc. #5), Dennis Ray Sneed, M.D. (Doc. #6), Heriberto Salinas, M.D. (Doc. #7), Terrence Lee Moore (Doc. #8), Thomas Bohnfalk (Doc. #9), George V. Cathey (Doc. #10), Hilda Thompson (Doc. #12), Sidney Boyd Chadwell, Jr., D.O. (Doc. #16). See Memorandum and Pretrial Order No. 3666, Accadia, et al. v. Wyeth, et al., CIV.A. No. 03-20546 (E.D. Pa. June 29, 2004);}

^{2. The claims against all defendants except Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and A.H. Robins Company, Inc. are DISMISSED; and}

^{3. The motion of defendant Arthur Hadley to withdraw as attorney (Doc. #11) is DENIED as moot.}

^4-15-2005

⁵⁰⁰⁷

^{Re: Dorothy Alexander (04-26342), Karen Allen (04-21585), Toya Allen (04-26527), Barbara Barker (04-27320), Mary Beatty (04-26532), Bonnie Becker (04-21907), Jackqulyn bodenstedt (04-26407), Scharley Brite (04-26315), Caroline Brooks (04-26437), Richard Broussard (04-21590), Lisa M. Brown (04-26596), Randy E. Capps (04-26636), James I. Case (04-26638), Michelle L. Claunch (04-21357), Gelea Clem (04-26435), Dale Craig (04-26364), Lou Criff (04-21583), Pamela Custer (04-21103), Jonnie Draneal (04-26635), Barbara Deanda (04-26318), Merilyn Deane (04-26565), Lakeisheia Dennis (04-26536), Colleen Dowden (04-26646), Gilda Dunn (04-26562), Melody Elledge (04-26478), Margaret Falconer (04-26440), Jennifer Fick (04-26578), Cherice Fields (04-26526), Bonnie Freeman (04-26320), Karen Gracey (04-25830), Joanna Graham (04-26343), Lanelle Hanagriff (04-26352), Leticia Hanks (04-26644), Kathy Harpst (04-21588), Sheryl Herron (04-26355), Kathy Hicks (04-26579), Barbara Holden (04-26643), Edith Johnson (04-22926), Shellie Karm (04-21356), Victoria Keigh (04-21584), Jana Koen (04-26597), Angela Martin (04-26348), Lynda Martin (04-26585), Guadalupe Martinez (04-26568), Debra May (04-26807), Cheryl McCurdy (03-20146), Joan McWilliams (04-26586), Lisa Miner (04-26323), Ginger Morrow-Williamson (04-26390, Sandra Nickerson (04-26372), Barbara Nini (04-26529), Sherrye Patterson (04-21906), Rhonda Pavelka (04-23746), Jayne Payne (04-26337), Lexie Reneau (04-26359), Sherri Rowe (04-26837), Ruby Ryan (04-21579), Kimberly Schexnaider (04-26551), Caroline Smith (04-26614), Ruth Spence (03-20388), Sherry Stasney (04-26641), Susan Stormer (04-26575), Angel Turner (04-20180), Leticia Velasquez (04-26598), Clara Vice (04-26494), Ouida Wallace (04-22929), William Willard (04-26560), Denise Williams (04-26808), Laqueta Williams (04-26330), Bonnie Wright (04-26347) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2005, fo the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of Wyeth to dismiss the non-diverse defendants as fraudulently joined is GRANTED;}

^{2. The motions of plaintiffs in the following actions to remand are DENIED: Jackqulyn Bodenstedt v. Wyeth, Merilyn K. Deane v. Wyeth, Sherrye Patterson v. Wyeth, Caroline M. Smith v. Wyeth, & Ouida A. Wallace v. Wyeth;}

^{3. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth are DISMISSED; and}

^{4. The motion of defendant Bobby Marek in Rhonda K. Pavelka v. Wyeth for summary judgment (Doc. #3) is DENIED as moot.}

^4-15-2005

⁵⁰⁰⁸

^{Re: Roger B. White v. Wyeth (04-25391)}

^{AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of plaintiff Roger B. White "to stay all proceedings in accordance with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act" is GRANTED;}

^{2. All proceedings in the above captioned case are STAYED until plaintiff is granted leave to return to the United States by the United States Army; and}

^{3. Plaintiff shall notify defendant Wyeth within 30 days of being granted leave to return to the United States by the United States Army.}

^4-15-2005

⁵⁰⁰⁹

^{Re: Mallie Vee McCullum v. Wyeth (03-20538)}

^{AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in Pretrial Memorandum and Order No. 3592, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of defendants Dr. Scott Jordan, Dr. Stephen Tramill, Dr. Dennis Simms, Dr. Harry Causey, Dr. Robert Jordan, and Dr. John Mann to strike plaintiff’s expert and for summary judgment (Doc. #7) is DENIED as moot; and}

^{2. The motion of defendant John G. Downer, M.D., for substitution of counsel (Doc. #2) is DENIED as moot.}

^4-15-2005

⁵⁰¹⁰

^{Re: Robert McDonald v. Wyeth (03-20190)}

^{AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the unopposed motions of defendants Samuel Mark Allen, M.D., Adrian K. Goss, M.D., and Samuel Okoye to dismiss the complaint as to them (Docs. #27 & #32) on the ground that they are fraudulently joined are GRANTED. See Memorandum and Pretrial Order No. 3281, French v. Wyeth.}

^4-15-2005

⁵⁰¹¹

^{Re: Cheryl Chestnut v. Wyeth (04-23161)}

^{AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of defendant Benjamin Weiner, M.D., to dismiss the complaint as to him (Doc. #5) on the ground that he is fraudulently joined is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories are DISMISSED. See Memorandum and Pretrial Order No. 3666, Accadia v. Wyeth.}

^4-15-2005

⁵⁰¹²

^{Re: Doris Waldron v. Wyeth (04-26196)}

^{AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motions of the following defendants to dismiss the claims against them on the ground that they are fraudulently joined are GRANTED; Frank A. Smith, III, M.D., (Doc. #6), Richard Bechtol, M.D. (Doc. #7), David Brister, M.D. (Doc. #8), Merle Pounds, M.D. (Doc. #9), Joseph Scott, M.D. (Doc. #10), K.A. Kaissi, M.D. (Doc. #11). See Memorandum and Pretrial Order No. 3666, Accadia v. Wyeth.}

^{2. The claims against all defendants except Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and A.H. Robins Company, Inc. are DISMISSED; and}

^{3. The motion of defendant Arthur Hadley (Doc. #5) to withdraw as attorney is DENIED as moot.}

^4-18-2005

⁵⁰¹³

^{Re: Sherry E. Lott v. Wyeth (04-22533)}

^{AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of Wyeth for leave to depose prisoner, Sherry E. Lott, is GRANTED.}

^4-18-2005

⁵⁰¹⁴

^{Re: Brinda D. Jones v. Wyeth (03-20250)}

^{AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth herein, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of defendant Dr. Russell Belenchia to dismiss (Doc. #9) is GRANTED;}

^{2. The motion of defendant David Richardson, M.D. for substitution of counsel (Doc. #7) is DENIED as moot;}

^{3. All defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and A.H. Robins Co., Inc., are DISMISSED; and}

^{4. The unopposed notice of dismissal by plaintiffs Rosetta Anderson, Jennifer Ann Bishop, Mary Blakes, Myle Claiborne, Betty Davis, Teresa Ann Achols, Peggy Sue Greer, Lonnie Hamlin-April, Mary E. Johnson, Brinda D. Jones, Linda Faye King, Sandra King, Tamara Marks, Holly Lyell McNamara, Charlotte D. Nicholson, Frednia Perkins, Mary Ann Pierce, and Esta L. Rigdon as to defendant Rosement Pharmaceutical Corporation (Doc. #8) is DENIED as moot.}

^4-18-2005

⁵⁰¹⁵

^{Re: Judy Anderson (04-27240), Peggy Anderson (04-27256), Caroll Baldridge (04-26727), Laura Bradley (05-20435), Yvonne Crow (04-26842), Shirley Deemon (04-22794), Deborah Jennings (05-20441), Sterling Manning (04-21081), Andrea Ramos (05-20434), Joan Smith (04-28600), & Frances Whatley (04-27271) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motions of plaintiffs to remand in the above-captioned actions are DENIED;}

^{2. All defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth are DISMISSED; and}

^{3. The motion of defendant Scott M. Bergerson in Crow v. Wyeth to dismiss (Doc. #3) is DENIED as moot.}

^4-18-2005

⁵⁰¹⁶

^{468 cases filed by O’Quinn, Laminack v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the fraudulently joined defendants is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above captioned actions except Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and A.H. Robins Company, Inc. are DISMISSED. See Memorandum and Pretrial Order No. 3666, Accadia v. Wyeth.}

^4-19-2005

⁵⁰¹⁷

^{Re: Emiko Arashiro (05-20055), Delois Armstrong (05-20057), Maria Ballinger (04-29817), Mary Barton (05-20050), Cinthia Brookins (05-20029). <utpm Vj;sbom (05-20092), Felicia Crawford (05-20020), Kimberly Crider (05-20050), Robert Cuellar (05-20019), Colleen De Sandro (05-20030), Elizabeth Elias (05-20035), Toby Feinstein (04-29647), Betty Ford (04-29757), Mary Garcia (05-20089), Mary Gillion (05-20039), Gloria Givens (05-20082), Nickole Gonzalez (05-20067), Sandra Gray (05-20022), Tammy Green (05-20038), Leoti Hemming (05-20044), Sandra Johnson (05-20018), Nancy Katris (05-20036). Jannis Keppler (05-20094), Veva Lackey (05-20083), Patricia Larsen (05-20047), Michelle Lynch (05-20063), Flordeliz Marsh (05-20070), Brooke Martinez (05-20081), Carmen Mendez (05-20073), Sally Montoya (05-20082), Vicki White (05-20032), Linda Whitfield (05-20074), Ann Wilber (04-29893), Debbie Williams (04-29877), Theresa Wirz (05-20024), Chris Wixon (04-29867), Sharon Wright (04-29985), & Patricia Yancy (04-29951) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motions of plaintiff to remand in the aboe-captioned actions to the Superior Court of Los Angeles county, California are DENIED; and}

^{2. All defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth are DISMISSED.}

^4-19-2005

⁵⁰¹⁸

^{Re: Lawrence H. Ludwig v. AHP (98-20601)}

^{AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The "verified petition for order permitting removal of block on accounts of Lawrence Henry Ludwig" from Home State Bank Account No. ----- and Centennial Bank of the West No. ---------- and "permitting withdrawal of funds because the minor has attained the age of majority" is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The blocks on Home State Bank Account No. ----- and Centennial Bank of the West No. ----- are lifted and the funds contained therein may be removed without further order of this court.}

^4-19-2005

⁵⁰¹⁹

^{STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO WYETH’S FIRST OMNIBUS MOTION TO COMPEL CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS TO PRODUCE DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY PTO 2930}

^{It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED between Plaintiffs and Wyeth, through their respective counsel, that Plaintiffs shall file their responses to Wyeth’s Motion to Compel on or before April 21, 2005.}

^{This extension is for a period of less than 30 days. No prior extension has been requested or given in this matter.}

^4-19-2005

⁵⁰²⁰

^{Re: Ronald Matthews v. Wyeth (03-20291)}

^{AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2005, upon consideration of the unopposed motion and detailed representations of counsel in support of allowing the law firm of Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.a., and Jack C. Fruge, Jr., Esq. and Daniel M. Homolka, P.A. to withdraw as counsel for plaintiffs Ronald and Jessica Matthews in the above-captioned action, it is hereby ORDERED that withdrawal is permitted, subject to the following conditions:}

^{1. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall send a letter to plaintiffs by certified mail that will include the following:}

^{A. A copy of this order;}

^{B. A statement outlining to plaintiffs the importance of their proceeding on this case with counsel familiar}

^{with the law and the procedures in Federal Court of cases similar to this case;}

^{C. Plaintiffs’ counsels’ letter shall also provide that plaintiffs shall have 30 days from the date of this}

^{order to secure new counsel if plaintiffs intend to proceed with counsel in this matter;}

^{D. Plaintiffs’ counsels’ letter shall also state that the court intends to grant plaintiffs’ present counsels’}

^{motion to withdraw at the expiration of the 30-day period, and the case shall proceed on its normal}

^{trial schedule whether or not plaintiffs have secured new counsel; and}

^{E. Plaintiffs’ counsel may include any other matter that plaintiffs’ counsel believes is pertinent in the}

^{Letters to plaintiffs;}

^{2. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall file with the Clerk of Court within 10 days of the date of this order a certificate that both evidences that plaintiffs’ counsel has complied with all of the foregoing requirements of this order and states the plaintiffs’ last known addresses; and}

^{3. 30 days from the date of this order, provided all the foregoing steps have been completed by plaintiffs’ counsel, plaintiffs’ counsel shall be deemed to be released from further responsibility to the court as counsel for plaintiffs in this civil action.}

^4-20-2005

⁵⁰²¹

^{Re: Vivian William v. Wyeth (03-20202)}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth herein, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of defendant James Riser, M.D. to dismiss (Doc. #7) is GRANTED;}

^{2. The motion of defendant Edsel Stewart, M.D., for leave of court to file memorandum of authorities in support of motion to dismiss and reply to plaintiffs’ motion to strike (Doc. #8) is GRANTED;}

^{3. The motion of defendant Edsel Stewart, M.D. to dismiss (Doc. #32) is GRANTED;}

^{4. The motion of plaintiffs to strike Edsel Stewart, M.D.’s motion to dismiss (Doc. #6) is DENIED as moot;}

^{5. All defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and A.H. Robins Company, Inc. are DISMISSED; and}

^{6. The motion of defendant Amide Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to substitute individual counsel (Doc. #34) os DENIED as moot.}

^4-20-2005

⁵⁰²²

^{Re: Cheryl McCurdy v. Wyeth (03-20146)}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in Memorandum and Pretrial Order No. 5007 (E.D. Pa. April 18, 2005), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of Wyeth to dismiss the complaint as to defendant David Pampe, M.D. (Doc. #14) on the ground that he is fraudulently joined is DENIED as moot.}

^4-20-2005

⁵⁰²³

^{Re: Azure Dodson v. Wyeth (04-21537)}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of plaintiffs to remand is DENIED as moot for the reason that the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas has previously ruled on this motion. See Dodson, et al. v. Wyeth, et al., No. MO-03-CA-146-H (W.D. Tex. Dec. 11, 2003); and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants except Wyeth in the above-captioned action are DISMISSED.}

^4-20-2005

⁵⁰²⁴

^{Re: All Actions FILED UNDER SEAL}

^{AND NOW, April 20, 2005, upon consideration of PMC’s Motion for Release and Use of Funds form the MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account, established by Gregory Miller, Esquire, Escrow Agent, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that said Motion is GRANTED and Gregory Miller, Esquire, is directed to make payment on invoices totaling 100,875.42 to the PMC Fen-Phen Litigation Account, by wire transfer.}

^4-20-2005

⁵⁰²⁵

^{Re: Mary Dianne Morrison and Tom Morrison v. Wyeth (03-20168)}

^{On this day came on to be heard the Motion to Dismiss of the Plaintiffs Mary Dianne and Tom Morrison, by and through their attorney of record, Bill Ogletree, for dismissal of Plaintiffs’ cause of action with prejudice as against the Defendants Wyeth f/k/a AHP; Wyeth Pharmaceuticals f/k/a Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, a Division of Wyeth, the Court, after considering the Motion, is of the opinion that same should be granted. It is , therefore,}

^{ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the cause of action of Plaintiffs, Mary Dianne and Tom Morrison, by and through their attorney of record, Bill Ogletree, for dismissal of Plaintiffs’ cause of action with prejudice as against the Defendants Wyeth f/k/a AHP Corporation; Wyeth Pharmaceuticals f/k/a Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, a Division of Wyeth, be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff to reinstate or litigate any claim, demand or cause of action asserted, or which could have been asserted herein.}

^{It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that each party is to bear their own costs.}

^4-20-2005

⁵⁰²⁶

^{Re: Cathy McCarty v. Wyeth (03-20306)}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of defendant Paul N. Selvadurai, M.D. to dismiss (Doc. #2) is GRANTED;}

^{2. All claims against defendant Paul N. Selvadurai, M.D. are dismissed; and}

^{3. The motion of defendant Paul N. Selvaduari, M.D. for summary judgment (Doc. #7) is DENIED as moot.}

^4-20-2005

⁵⁰²⁷

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 20th day of April, 2005, upon consideration of the Fifty-Eighth Application by Escrow Agent for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (03/01/05 through 03/31/05), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Escrow Agent for disbursements and compensation in the amount of $2,092.47 for the period from 03/01/05 through 03/31/05), in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.}

^4-20-2005

⁵⁰²⁸

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 20th day of April, 2005, upon consideration of the Eighty-Fourth Application by Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (03/01/05 through 03/31/05), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements in the amount of $125,976.73 for the period from 03/01/05 through 03/31/05, in accordance with the procedure established by the court.}

^4-20-2005

⁵⁰²⁹

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 20th day of April, 2005, upon consideration of the Thirty-Sixth Application by Special Master for interim compensation and reimbursement of expenses relating to Pretrial Order No. 2383 (03/01/05 through 03/31/05), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that Wyeth reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $6442.98, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.}

^4-20-2005

⁵⁰³⁰

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 20th day of April, 2005, upon consideration of the Fifty-Second application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (03/02/01/05 through 03/31/05), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $152,530.12 in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.}

^4-21-2005

⁵⁰³¹

^{Re: Sheila Bworn v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 21st day of April, 2005, upon consideration of class counsel’s motion on behalf of Fund Administrator pursuant to Section VI.E.4 of the Seventh Amendment for Court Approval of Authorization Application for Purchase of Insurance, said Authorization Application is GRANTED AND APPROVED. If is FURTHER ORDERED THAT PNC Bank, N.A., the "Escrow Agent" for the Seventh Amendment to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with AHP, shall release funds held in escrow pursuant to the terms of the Seventh Amendment for the payment of the premium for the purchase of the insurance in the amount of $249,750.00. It is further ORDERED that the Fund Administrator is relieved of the obligation imposed upon it by the terms of the Seventh Amendment to procure insurance for PNC Bank, N.A. in its capacity as the Escrow Agent. The Court hereby APPROVES the procurement of insurance to cover the claims proceeding and administration activities of the fund administrator, the MRCC and the Participating Physicians.}

^4-21-2005

⁵⁰³²

^{Re: Trina Waters v. Wyeth (03-20323)}

^{AN D NOW, this 21st day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in Memorandum and Pretrial Order No. 3305, it is hereby Ordered that:}

^{1. The motion of the United States to amend the above-captioned action to substitute the United States as the proper party is DENIED as moot; and}

^{2. The motion of the United States to Dismiss (Doc. #4) is DENIED as moot.}

^4-21-2005

⁵⁰³³

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 21st day of April, 2005, the court having received no objections pursuant to Pretrial Order 4193, dated December 3, 2004, IT IS ORDERED that:}

^{1. Helen Bravermand, Hon. John L. Braxton, 3. Norma B. Carter, 4. Joseph G. DeREspino, 5. Joseph M. Donley, 6. Nancy J. Gellman, 7. Susan K. Herschel 8. Byron R. LaVan, 9. Gregroy H. Mathews}

^{are hereby appointed as mediators for the purpose of conducting mediations under the Eight Amendment to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement with AHP.}

^4-21-2005

⁵⁰³⁴

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 21st day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the "motion by plaintiffs’ co-lead counsel for a scheduling conference concerning the future award of common benefit fees" (Doc. No. 207830) is GRANTED. The court will advise all parties of the date on which this conference will be scheduled.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰³⁵

^{Re: Robert Wimpie v. Wyeth (04-22233)}

^{Plaintiff Robert Wimpie advises the Court that he wishes to dismiss his claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Robert Wimpie and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Robert Wimpie’s claims as to Defendant Wyeth.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰³⁶

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of Wyeth to supplement existing orders concerning medical records collection in MDL cases (Doc. No. 207513) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;}

^{2. The medical authorization form approved in PTO No. 2930 is modified prospectively to exclude only "psychotherapy notes" from the scope of production and is so modified retroactively on an as-needed basis only; and}

^{3. The motion of Wyeth to supplement existing orders concerning medical records collection in MDL cases is otherwise DENIED.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰³⁷

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of plaintiffs represented by Fleming & Associates, LLP to enforce PTO Nos. 21 and 22 (Doc. No. 207452) is DENIED.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰³⁸

^{Re: Emily Sommerville v. Wyeth (04-27058)}

^{Plaintiff in the above-referenced case and Defendant Wyeth, through their respective counsel, enter into this Stipulation with respect to the following facts:}

^{1. In the interest of judicial economy and to facilitate the expeditious trial of the controlling issues in this matter, it is appropriate to dismiss THOMAS L. RILEY, M.D.}

^{2. Therefore, it is agreed between Plaintiff and Wyeth that THOMAS L. RILEY, M.D. may be dismissed at this time.}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Thomas L. Riley, M.D. only.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff, Emily Sommerville, Defendant Wyeth and Defendant Thomas L. Riley, M.D., the only defendants who have appeared in this action to date.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰³⁹

^{Re: Norma Ramirez v. Wyeth (04-29966)}

^{Plaintiff in the above-referenced case and Defendant Wyeth, through their respective counsel, enter into this Stipulation with respect to the following facts:}

^{1. In the interest of judicial economy and to facilitate the expeditious trial of the controlling issues in this matter, it is appropriate to dismiss THOMAS L. RILEY, M.D.}

^{2. Therefore, it is agreed between Plaintiff and Wyeth that THOMAS L. RILEY, M.D. may be dismissed at this time.}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Thomas L. Riley, M.D. only.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff, Norma Ramirez, Defendant Wyeth and Defendant Thomas L. Riley, M.D., the only defendants who have appeared in this action to date.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁴⁰

^{Re: Beverly S. Corbin v. Wyeth (04-20926)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)91)(ii), that the claims of Plaintiff Beverly S. Corbin in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^{In the event that plaintiff shall name re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Rdux, plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and plaintiff no new defendants.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁴¹

^{Re: Amanda Hencke v. Wyeth (04-20919)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of Plaintiff Amanda Hencke in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^{In the event that plaintiff shall name re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and plaintiff no new defendants.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁴²

^{Re: Bettie W. Noah v. Wyeth (03-20199)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the claims of plaintiffs Sarah Clark Ray and Mickey Ray in the above-captioned matter are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. Wyeth waives no argument or defense by agreeing to enter into this stipulation.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁴³

^{Re: Regina Jones McMullen v. Wyeth (03-20235)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the claims of plaintiff Robert Cochran in the above-captioned matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁴⁴

^{Re: Saundra K. Anderson (Yolanda B. Steinberg) v. Wyeth (04-29834)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the claims of Yolanda B. Steinberg in the above-captioned matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Yolanda B. Steinberg and defendant Wyeth who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁴⁵

^{Re: Sandy Altenbaumer, Imaene Beck, Peggy Bray, Janell Burns, Helen Byers, Harold Harrison, Joe Ward, and Annette Zachery v. Wyeth (04-21433)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the claims of plaintiff Janelle Burns in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁴⁶

^{Re: Kathy Barba, Michelle Bittle, Valerie Casper, Patricia Crow, Genie Harness, Joye Hendrix, and Betty Ward v. Wyeth (04-22989)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the claims of plaintiffs Valerie Casper and Joyce Hendrix in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁴⁷

^{Re: Judy Davis, Barbara Hogue, Janice Hughes, Carolyn Miller, Crystal Michelle Richardson, Sue Ward, Beverly Wright, Cora Wright and Beth Yocom v. Wyeth (04-21672)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the claims of plaintiffs Judy Davis, Barbara Hogue, and Jancie Hughes, in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁴⁸

^{Re: Betty Carol Bentley v. Wyeth (03-20187)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the claims of plaintiff Sarah Clark Ray in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁴⁹

^{Re: Nicole Davis, et al. v. Wyeth (04-25842)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the claims of plaintiff Barbara Lawrence in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal shall not affect any of the rights that this plaintiff may have under the Accelerated Implementation Option of the Nationwide Class Action Settlement of the litigation against Wyeth relating to the diet drugs Pondimin and Redux.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁵⁰

^{Re: Lisa Sabbatini, et al v. Wyeth (04-28534)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the claims of plaintiff Brenda Compton Stokes in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal shall not affect any of the rights that this plaintiff may have under the Accelerated Implementation Option of the Nationwide Class Action Settlement of the litigation against Wyeth relating to the diet drugs Pondimin and Redux.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁵¹

^{Re: Mary N. Yates v. Wyeth (04-22243)}

^{Plaintiff Mary N. Yates advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Mary N. Yates and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Mary N. Yates’ claims as to Defendant Wyeth.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁵²

^{Re: Eloise and William Evans v. Wyeth (04-29433)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiffs and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, those being Wyeth Company, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and Karlin Billings.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁵³

^{Re: Patricia Deasy v. Wyeth (04-20814)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of Plaintiff Patricia Deasey the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^{In the event that plaintiff shall name re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and plaintiff no new defendants.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁵⁴

^{Re: Mary Anne Draney (02-20249), Shaunee Davis (02-20199), Cynthia D. Montague (02-20197) & Pamela Riding (02-20202) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, upon consideration of this Joint Motion to Vacate in Part Suggestion of Remand Order No. 18, it is hereby ORDERED that said motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth therein. The Suggestion of Remand Order No. 18 is hereby vacated insofar as it applies to the above-captioned cases of plaintiffs Mary Anne Draney, Shaunee Davis, Cynthia D. Montague, and Pamela Riding.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁵⁵

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of Wyeth for a fair allocation of medical record collection costs (Doc. No. 207684) is DENIED.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁵⁶

^{Re: Margaret Falconer (04-26440) & Edith Johnson (04-22926) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in Pretrial Order No. 5007, the motions of plaintiffs to remand in the above-captioned actions are DENIED as moot.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁵⁷

^{Re: Bonnie Hart v. Wyeth (05-20457)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20457, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁵⁸

^{Re: Barbara Scott v. Wyeth (05-20136)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20136, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁵⁹

^{Re: Cynthia A. Loera v. Wyeth (04-26809)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-26809, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁶⁰

^{Re: Carlynn R. Priestley v. Wyeth (04-20992)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-20992, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁶¹

^{Re: Diana Adkins v. Wyeth (05-20454)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20454, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁶²

^{Re: Dp;pres Baccus v. Wyeth (05-20475)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20475, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁶³

^{Re: Diane Miles v. Wyeth (05-20325)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20325, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁶⁴

^{Re: Dale Turner v. Wyeth (05-20463)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20463, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁶⁵

^{Re: Eulen Lang v. Wyeth (03-20609)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 03-20609, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁶⁶

^{Re: Helen Mitchell v. Wyeth (05-20245)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20245, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁶⁷

^{Re: Kimberly D. Pomilla v. Wyeth (04-26584)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-26584, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁶⁸

^{Re: Lorene E. Copeland v. Wyeth (04-26469)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-26469, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁶⁹

^{Re: Linda J. Falkner v. Wyeth (05-20407)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20407, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁷⁰

^{Re: Leone M. Nelson v. Wyeth (04-21893)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21893, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁷¹

^{Re: Margaret Cultice v. Wyeth (05-20458)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20458, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁷²

^{Re: Melissa Houston v. Wyeth (05-20226)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20226, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁷³

^{Re: Mallie Vee McCullum v. Wyeth (03-20538)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 03-20538, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁷⁴

^{Re: Margaret Jane Williams v. Wyeth (05-20235)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20235, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁷⁵

^{Re: Nelda S. Condra v. Wyeth (04-26648)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-26648, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁷⁶

^{Re: Nancy Cronquist v. Wyeth (05-20465)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20465, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁷⁷

^{Re: Patricia Burnett v. Wyeth (05-20238)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20238, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁷⁸

^{Re: Sandra Cody v. Wyeth (05-20459)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20459, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁷⁹

^{Re: Stephanie Roane v. Wyeth (05-20201)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 05-20201, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁸⁰

^{Re: Wendy C. Manning v. Wyeth (04-26725)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-26725, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁸¹

^{Re: Henry Lou Lollar v. Wyeth (04-28549)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff Sandra Mustin in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal shall not affect any of the rights that this plaintiff may have under the Accelerated Implementation Option of the Nationwide Class Action Settlement of the litigation against Wyeth relating to the diet drugs Pondimin and Redux.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁸²

^{Re: Naomi Backes (04-20477), Patricia Sue Bishop (03-20462), Norma J. Burman (03-20470), Carolyn Carmona (04-20549), Jerry Leona Cook (04-20239), Diane L. Craft (04-20865), Melony Dervin (03-20480), Linda Doyle (03-20608), Zola May Dunn (03-20605), Joyce Gulley (03-20606), Phyllis L. Harris (04-21390), Eileen Harvie (03-20522), Barbara Hawkins (04-20792), Mary Lou Hernandez (03-20530), Dolores Hinojosa (03-20512), Frances Jackson (04-21049), Robert Johnson (04-21379), Eddie Lagway (04-20624), Joyce Lessing (03-20520), Annie Lexie (04-20318), Joyce Love (04-20912), Maria Mayhew (03-20607), Carolyn McDuff (04-20486), Lynda Menier-Webb (04-20317), Patricia Moon-wily (04-20563), Patricia Philpot (04-20849), Delores Randle (04-20807), Jeanette Richard (04-20316), Annette Robberson (04-20893), Nancy Kay Rogers (04-20890), Deanna Rollings (03-20467), Gloria Salazar (04-20313), Gail Sampley (04-20355), Alberta Shears (04-20900), Rudolph Smith (03-20440), Wanda Sotello (03-20465), Janis Thibodeaux (04-20552), Angelita Nava Thompson (03-20481), Hyrice Tomlin (04-20883), Mary Kay Wallace (04-20265), Brenda Walters (04-20480), Robyn Washington (03-20351), Sharon White (04-20831) & Dana L. Wood (04-20848) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in PTO No. 5016 and Memorandum and PTO No. 3666, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of defendant Kendra J. Belfi in Backes to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{2. The motion of defendant Theodore F. Botkin in Bishop to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{3. The motions of defendant Homero Rodriquez-Juarez to dismiss in the following actions are DENIED as moot: Burman, Dervin, Harvie, Hinojosa, and Rollings;}

^{4. The motions of defendant Jay C. Proctor to dismiss in the following actions are DENIED as moot: Carmona, Salazar and Sampley;}

^{5. The motions of defendant Benjamin Weiner to dismiss in the following actions are DENIED as moot; Cook, and Harris;}

^{6. The motion of defendant Merle Pounds in Craft to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{7. The motion of defendant Dr. Debra Williams in Doyle to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{8. The motion of defendant Dr. V. Koli in Gulley to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{9. The motion of defendant Dr. Marlene Sanchez in Dunn to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{10. The motion of defendant Dr. Richard Zimmerman in Hawkins to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{11. The motion of defendant Robert Hillard, M.D. in Hernandez to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{12. The motion of defendant Kenneth C. Killen in Jacksonto dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{13. The motion of defendant Bruce Edward Barnum, M.D. in Johnson to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{14. The motion of defendant Dr. Larry A. Richardson in Lagway to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{15. The motions of defendant Dr. Belinda Padilla to dismiss the following actions are DENIED as moot: Lessing and Sotello;}

^{16. The motions of defendant Dr. Harvey Randolph to dismiss in the following actions are DENIED as moot: Lexie, Menier-Webb and Richcard;}

^{17. The motion of defendant Dr. Brian J. Caplin in love to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{18. The motion of defendant Dr. Larry Baros in Mayhew to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{19. The motion of defendant Carlton Clarke in McDuff is DENIED as moot;}

^{20. The motion of defendant William R. Boone, M.D. in Moon-Wily to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{21. The motion of defendant Dr. John Woodard in Philpot to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{22. The motion of defendant Helmatha Ravi Tyer in Randle to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{23. The motion of defendant Edward W. Guinn, M.D. in Robberson to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{24. The motion of defendant Dr. Mary F. Stone in Rogers to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{25. The motion of defendant Peter Damico, M.D. in Shears to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{26. The motion of defendant Dr. Manuel Quinones in Smith is DENIED as moot;}

^{27. The motion of defendant Daleo Pharmacy in Thibodeaux to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{28. The motion of defendant T.F. Botkin, M.D. in Thompson to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{29. The motion of defendant Loraine Nadine Yeoham in Tomlin to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{30. The motion of defendant O.T. Smith, M.D. in Wallace to withdraw as counsel is DENIED as moot;}

^{31. The motion of defendant Dr. Arthur Hadley in Walters to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{32. The motion of defendant Dr. Steven Douglass Fillman in Washington to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{33. The motion of defendant Dr. H. Thomas Willard in White to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{34. The motion of defendant Robert Shaw, M.D. in Wood to dismiss is DENIED as moot.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁸³

^{Re: Tami Abernathy (04-27092, Jessica Beloney (04-26698), Connie Best (04-26819), Mary Clayton (04-27093), Glenda Coffman (04-27097), Shirley Cormier (04-20331), Lynn Crane (04-26818), Eva L. Davis (03-20594), Reina Davis (04-20371), Judy Deshong (04-20004), Sandra J. Dye (03-20635), Summer Fowler (04-23145), Ouida Garrett (04-20613), Mark Gill (03-20553), Regihna Grizzle (04-27096), Julia Jacks (04-26749), Debra Kollman (04-20401), Tona Lawhorn (04-27095), Carla Light (03-20067), Maryann McBrayer (03-20534), Vicki L. McBride (03-20591), Andrea Odom (04-26764), Daniel Raszler (04-26816), Gail Roork (04-26913), Eldifonsa Soliz (04-27321), Lawrence Thompson (04-20663), Margaret Tipping (04-20199), Nelda F. Willey (04-27268) & Joann Wycoff (04-28607) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motions of plaintiffs to remand are DENIED;}

^{2. The motion of defendant pharmacies to dismiss the fraudulently joined defendants is GRANTED;}

^{3. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., A.H. Robins Company, Inc., and Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. are DISMISSED;}

^{4. The motion of defendant Dr. Thomas Bohmfalk in Davis to transfer venue is DENIED as moot;}

^{5. The motion of defendant Community Pharmacy in Davis for leave to file a motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{6. The motion of defendant Walter L. Geyer, M.D. in Davis to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{7. The motion of defendant James R. Cole, M.D. in Davis to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{8. The motion of plaintiffs in Soliz to reconsider the transferor’s court’s timeliness ruling is DENIED as moot.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁸⁴

^{Re: Doris V. Waldron (Shirley Burnsed) v. Wyeth (04-26196)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of Shirley Bursed, one of the plaintiffs in the above-captioned multi-plaintiff case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to Defendant Dr. Ricahrd Bechtol with each party to bear its own costs.}

^{Nothing in this Order shall effect the claims and causes of action of plaintiff against any other defendant in this matter.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^4-25-2005

⁵⁰⁸⁵

^{Re: Doris V. Waldron (Patsy Hagemann) v. Wyeth (04-26196)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of Patsy Hagemann, one of the plaintiffs in the above-captioned multi-plaintiff case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Nothing in this Order shall effect the claims and causes of action of plaintiff against any other defendant in this matter.}

^{In the event that plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^4-26-2005

⁵⁰⁸⁶

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) Claimant David P. Armstrong}

^{IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between pro se claimant David P. Armstrong, Wyeth, Class Counsel and the AHP Settlement Trust (the "Trust"):}

^{1. Claimant David P. Armstrong shall withdraw his Motion to Grant an Exemption from the Stay (Docket No. 1887).}

^{2. Relief from the stay provisions of PTO 4467 1(b) is hereby granted permitting the Trust to process and pay David P. Armstrong’s Cash and Additional Medical Services benefit claim, upon approval by the Court of this stipulation.}

^4-26-2005

⁵⁰⁸⁷

^{Re: Faith Adams v. Wyeth (04-29520)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of plaintiff to remand is DENIED.}

^4-26-2005

⁵⁰⁸⁸

^{Re: Paula K. Hundley v. Wyeth (04-20567)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in Memorandum and Pretrial Order No. 4167, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of defendant Norman F. Clothier, M.D. to dismiss is DENIED as moot.}

^4-26-2005

⁵⁰⁸⁹

^{Re: Yvette M. Cotton v. Wyeth (04-21371)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in Pretrial Order No. 3866, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of defendant Dr. John Purcell Reeves to dismiss is DENIED as moot.}

^4-26-2005

⁵⁰⁹⁰

^{Re: Marie Joiner v. Wyeth (03-20394)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of defendant Ted T. Pridmore, M.D. to dismiss the complaint as to him on the ground that he is fraudulently joined is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth and Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. are DISMISSED. See Pretrial Order nO. 3666.}

^4-26-2005

⁵⁰⁹¹

^{Re: Mary Jane Vallesteros v. Wyeth (03-20377)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of defendant Walter Geyer, M.D. to dismiss the complaint as to him on the ground that he is fraudulently joined is GRANTED. See Memorandum and Pretrial Order No. 3666.}

^4-26-2005

⁵⁰⁹²

^{Re: Carol Cantrell v. Wyeth (04-20003)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of defendant Stella Kwong, M.D. for summary judgment is DENIED as moot. See Pretrial Order No. 4002.}

^{2. The motion of defendant Robert G. Maul, Sr., D.O. to dismiss the complaint as to him on the ground that he is fraudulently joined is GRANTED.}

^{3. The motion of defendant Gene Earl, M.D. to dismiss the complaint as to him on the ground that he is fraudulently joined is GRANTED; and}

^{4. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth are DISMISSED. See Memorandum and Pretrial Order No. 3666.}

^4-27-2005

⁵⁰⁹³

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of April 2005, the court having reviewed the attached procedures for the Eighth Amendment Mediation Program ("Mediation Procedures"), and being satisfied that the Mediation Procedures address o the satisfaction of the parties all comments filed with the court, it is hereby ORDERED that the Mediation Procedures are approved.}

^4-27-2005

⁵⁰⁹⁴

^{Re: Carol Martinez v. Wyeth (04-20892)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in PTO No. 4590, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of defendant Hriishi K. Maewal to dismiss is DENIED as moot.}

^4-27-2005

⁵⁰⁹⁵

^{Re: Sharon Alcee, Josephine Aldridge, theresa Allen, Bettye Bowerman, Pearlene Brackett, Joann Breneck, Kathleen Brown, Velma Clark, Joann Colemen, Jacqueline Covington, Anne Cox, Linda Davis, Debbie Dearick, Justine Dupree, Carolyn Eldredge, Betty Ellison, Connie Ellison, Lewis Franklin, Phyllis Fulmer, Dickie Garza, Tangelia Gaviao, Sherry Gay, Kimberly Gordon, Joy Graham-Stone, Tommie Harris, Dorothy Harrison, Marie Harshman, Johnnie Hawkins, Kerron Hawkins, Deborah Hebert, Carol Hill, Irma Hill, Paula Holland, Delena Honeycutt, Barbara Jackson, John James, Elizabeth Keller, Sheronda Kelley, Betty King, Kimberly Latta, Georgia Law, Yasmin Lee, Lewis Love, Ronnie McBeth, Sue Millican, Cherry Murphy, Katea Naeata, Gwen Neves, Mary Phelps, Betty Redd, Diana Ritter, Karen Salewski, Georgia Sanders, Rodney Sikes, Mcallen West & Mary Yarbrough v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of Wyeth to dismiss the non-diverse defendants as fraudulently joined in Kimberly Latta v. Wyeth is DENIED as moot for the reason that the non-diverse defendants have already been dismissed;}

^{2. The motion of Wyeth to dismiss the non-diverse defendants as fraudulently joined in the remaining above-captioned actions is GRANTED;}

^{3. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth, AHP, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, and A.H. Robins Company, Inc. are DISMISSED;}

^{4. The motion of defendant Carlton Clarke, M.d. to dismiss in Debbie Dearick is DENIED as moot; and}

^{5. The motion of defendant Benjamin Weiner, M.D. to dismiss in Lewis Franklin is DENIED as moot.}

^4-28-2005

⁵⁰⁹⁶

^{Re: Cheryl Yvonne Barnett v. Wyeth (03-20460)}

^{AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. A hearing will be held on May 17, 2005 at 2:00p.m. in Courtroom 16A in the USDC in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on "Wyeth’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, and for Costs and Attorney’s Fees, due to plaintiff’s Forgery and Fraud on the Court" filed in the above-captioned action;}

^{2. Counsel for plaintiff whose names appear on the complaint shall appear and show cause why sanctions should not be imposed on them as well as the plaintff; and}

^{3. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall promptly provide plaintiff Cheryl Yvonee Barnett with a copy of Wyeth’s motion and supporting documents and a copy of this Order.}

^4-28-2005

⁵⁰⁹⁷

^{Re: Perry Michael French (03-20353), Claudia Edwards (03-20326), Dorothy House (03-20247), Teresa Russum (03-20360), Jerry L. Stevens (03-20248) & Trina Waters (03-20323) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to have filed a severed and amended complaint within 60 days of severance pursuant to PTO No. 3770, 7, 8, 10, 12.}

^{1. All claim of Margo Jones in Perry Michael French ;}

^{2. All claims of Barbara Oakes in Claudia Edwards;}

^{3. All claims of Debra Tate and Carolyn Wells in Dorothy House;}

^{4. All claims of Joanne Turner in Teresa Russum;}

^{5. All claims of Lavon Coleman, Betty Speights, and Thelma Williams in Jerry Stevens; and}

^{6. All claims of Denny L. Vaughn in Trina Waers.}

^4-29-2005

⁵⁰⁹⁸

^{RE: Perry Michael French (03-20353), Claudia Edwards (03-20326), Dorothy House (03-20247), Teresa Russum (03-20360), Jerry L. Stevens (03-20248) & Trina waters (03-20323) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2005, for the reasons set forth in Pretrial Order No. 5097, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions os Wyeth to dismiss the claims of plaintiffs originally named in the above-captioned complaints who did not timely file a severed and amended complaints are DENIED as moot.}

^4-29-2005

⁵⁰⁹⁹

^{Re: Judith Baker (04-20038), Peggy S. Bennett-Davani (04-20134), Shirley Brown (03-20826), Kathy Budd (04-21530), Maria Catalena (04-20073), Ester Cordova (04-20293), Dianne Dionne (03-20487), Betty Fife (04-20115), Marilyn Goodsell (03-20821), Annie H. Harting (04-20104), Sindie Ledam (04-20292), Rita Leonard (03-20496), Sandra Macconnell (04-20107), Claudia Metzger (04-20105), Barbara Palomino (04-21531), Doris D. Roberts (04-20114), Jo Ann Stoker (03-20485), Judy Swinehart (03-20486), Connie G. Taylor (04-20116), Floresa Thomas (04-20055), Deandrea D. Watson (04-20133), Robert A. White (04-20131) & Carol S. Whitmoore (04-20110) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss fraudulently joined defendants is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Wyeth Holdings Company, Wyeth Consumer Healthcare, Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., American Cyanamid Corporation, and A.H. Robins Company, Inc. are DISMISSED.}

^4-29-2005

⁵¹⁰⁰

^{Re: Janice Auddell, Lewis Bennett, Rebecca Berry, Carol Boyett, Laverne Broadenaux, Ann Brooks, Dawn Brown, Nancy Brown, Tarus Burrell, Deborah Cannon, Peggy Chapman, Reba Denson, Susan Pate Drbrolski, Melissa Dawn Donnell, Balencia Dove-Kimble, Jerry Easley, Jewreca S. Evans, Beatrice Foster, Barbara Garrels, Delores Gonzales, Darla j. Gossom, Judy Gray, Victoria Harkrider, Shirley J. Hastik, Janice Henderson, Robin Hesse, Dorothy Holiday, Jacque D. Hyde, Elaine Kennedy, John C. Kerr, Connie Lawrence, Karen Lee, Mary Lightfoot, Alva Jo Lindsey, Mary L. Luckey, Lois A. Malone, Dianne Manis, Linda Manuel, Barbara Marcus, Juanita O. Martinez, Ruthan McDonald, Patricia McFarland, Tammy McHale, Susan Metzler, Dorothy Jean Morrow, Dolores Myers, Barbara J. Parker, Lisa C. Parker, Catherine Plath, Glenda Post, Roxanne Prado, Sharon Pretiss-Rogers, Gracie Ray, Clarence Rems, Patricia Rhodes, Wynde Rosanky-Herrera, Elizabeth Garcia Sanchez, Marty Snitkin, Margie Sparks, Michelle Speetzen, Karen C. Stinson, Grace Taylor, Linda Teel, Ruth Thibodeaux, Kathy L. Truitt, Linda Underwood, Margarita Valerio, Gayle Warzon, Carol Nadine White, Denise Wilsie, Clarida Sue Wyly, Ora Marie York v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of Wyeth to dismiss the non-diverse defendants as fraudulently joined is GRANTED;}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., and A.H. Robins Company, Inc. are DISMISSED; and}

^{3. The motion of attorney of defendant Dr. Arthur Hadley to withdraw as counsel in the following actions is DENIED as moot: Balencia Dove-Kimble, Victoria Harkrider, Shirley J. Hastik, John C. Kerr, Alva Jo Lindsay, Catherine Plath & Linda Underwood.}

^4-29-2005

⁵¹⁰¹

^{Re: Debra Tate v. Wyeth (04-20168)}

^{AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of plaintiffs Ricky Dodds and Deborah Stevener for leave to file a severed and amended complaint is GRANTED; and}

^{2. Plaintiffs shall have until May 16, 2005 to file severed and amended complaints accompanied by the $250.00 filing fee for each complaint.}

^4-29-2005

⁵¹⁰²

^{Re: Sheila Poole (04-20394) & April Vallanueva (04-204000) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the non-diverse defendants as fraudulently joined is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth are DISMISSED.}

^5-5-2005

⁵¹⁰³

^{Re: Janice Ferguson, Clinton Reeves Administrator and Personal Representative of the Estate of Brad Reeves v. Wyeth (04-20662)}

^{AND NOW TO WIT: This 5th day of May, 2005, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby}

^{ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹⁰⁴

^{Re: Melba Daughenbaugh (04-27269) & Denise Domingue (04-27265) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the fraudulently joined defendants is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth are DISMISSED.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹⁰⁵

^{Re: Amy Sanford (04-20169), Kimberly Alawine (03-20764), Loretta Grant (03-20330) & Lois Brady (03-20332) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to have filed a severed and amended complaint within 60 days of severance pursuant to PTO No. 3770 7, 8, 10, 12.}

^{1. All claims of Michelle Vincent, Gayle States, Marsha Mayfield, Melinda Hatlich, Ruby Shoffner and Shirley Wilson in Amy Sanford v. Wyeth.}

^{2. The claims of Deborah Palmer in Kimberly Alawine v. Wyeth.}

^{3. All claims of Jane Henry, Johnnie Tolliver and Thomas Stegall in Loretta Grant.}

^{4. All claims of Jacqueline Ducksworth, Charlotte Baughman and Rosemary Cooper in Lois Brady.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹⁰⁶

^{Re: Barbara Geisert (04-20098), Anthony Watson (03-20296) & Gladys Williamson (04-20197) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to have filed a severed and amended complaint within 60 days of severance pursuant to PTO No. 3770 7, 8, 10, 12.}

^{1. All claims of Barbara S. Wats, Angelia B. King, Tammy L. Branish, Irma L. Vera, Donis Wilkerson, Edith F. Sequerth, Jonella A. Shire, Lynda L. Trussell, Kathryn L. McCasllin, Denise Reinart, Rose L. Brancecum and Harriet L. Lloyd in Barbara Geisert v. AHP.}

^{2. All claims of Anthony Watson, Patricia Watson, Joan Perkins, and Ronald Potter in Anthony Watson.}

^{3. All claims of Debra Harris in Gladys Williamson.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹⁰⁷

^{Re: Angla Martin (03-20329) & Sandra Anderson (01-20182) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to have filed a severed and amended complaint within 60 days of severance pursuant to PTO No. 3770 7, 8, 10, 12.}

^{1. All claims of Sandra Akins, Judy Alexander, Johnnie Gail Anderson, Holly Anderson, Mary Austin, Tammy Baker, Ruth Baker-Forbes, Lisa Barbour, Amy Beckham, Nancy Bishop, Sheila Blaylock, Jenni Ann bond, Faye Breazeale, Ashley Britt, Joyce Brown, Sharon Carter, Carol Caylor, Robert Burton, Jackie Correro, Debra Craft, Roy Daves, Carnella Davis, Annette Davis, Shirley Davis-Hinson, Patsy Dunning, Wendy Dykes, Rebecca Edwards, Carl Estes, Michelle Etheridge, Ashley Farmer, Cindy Ferguson, Mary Free, Vicki Garrison, Mary Garth-Gilleylen, Addeal Giles, Joni Goss, Hazel Gross, Hazel Gross 1, Barry Grisham, Anita Hall, Cassandra Hayes, Sheila Hicks, Rosemary Howard, Lisa Ingram, Sharon Jackson, Carla Johnson, Pamela Johnson, James Jones, Kathy Jones, Elizabeth Jordan, Diane Ledbetter, Diane Lefaivre, John Lefevre, Amanda Lewis, David Longorita, Patricia Magee, Patricia Marchuk, Sylvester martin, Angel Masey, Richard Massey, Toni Matlock, Kitty McCoy, Carolyn McKenzie, Rhonda McPherson, Gloria McQuagge, Brent Miller, Henrietta Milton, Jennifer Moore, Vicki Mosley, William Moyers, Virginia Nabors, Gary Neceaise, Tami Nelson, Creola Nixon, Evie Parham, Gwen Reiber, Betty Robertson, Adriana Roman, Jane Ross, Stephanie Russell, Tanda Saxton, Linda Schepers, Penny Sevin, Kathy Shoffner, Patricia Smith, Reuben Smith, Rebecca Spencer, Joy Stafford, Sue Sutton, Teresa Tatum, Helen Touchstone, Joyce Trimble, Pamela Turner, Phyllis Turner, Cynthia Vickers, Virginia White, Douglas Williams, Deana Withers and Hannelore Yates in Angela Martin v. Wyeth.}

^{2. All claims of Sandra Anderson, Melissa Spurlock-homer and Patrick Morris in Sandra Anderson v. Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹⁰⁸

^{Re: Janice McCrory (03-20625) & Eileen Turner (04-20097) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to have filed a severed and amended complaint within 60 days of severance pursuant to PTO No. 3770 7, 8, 10, 12.}

^{1. All claims of Kathy Ashley, Judy Amason, Tammy Benefield, Paula Berry, Sheila Bridges, Patrice Brown, Janis Crapps, Demika Carven, Fola Davis, Patricia Ellis, Evelyn Fifer, Fannie Gibson, Charlotte Gillentine, Linda harvey, Sandra Hawkins, Jacqueline Hayes, Patricia Huggins, William James, Carol Jamison, Brenda Jenkins, Cahrlene Kincaide, Merry Latham, Mary Leo, Vanessa Liles, Mechelle Lowther, Faye Massey, Sherry Middleton, Cassandra Moore, Sheila Morrow, Joyce Moss, Lloyd Hopkins, Annie Ashley and Betsy Bailey in Janice McCrory v. Wyeth.}

^{2. All claims of Virgie A. Hughes, Rebecca R. Woodall, Debbie A. Schaefer, Evelynn R. Simmons, Jerri E. McColgin, Elynore Gay Aboulhosn, Robin S. Martin, Linda S. Feller, Sylvia A. Campbell, Mertice N. Whittle, Maida F. Pantaleri, Veronica F. Becker, Helen W. Lewis, Lil A. Glascock, Maxine L. Williams, Lana J. Mayers, Diana R. Oceguera, Anita L. Pope, Amanda M. Dumire, Peggy J. Roy, Mary E. Houchens, Konny J. Pereira, Amy N. Donato, Gail A. Harris, Donna Bradner and Tammy Chojnacki in Eileen Turner v. Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹⁰⁹

^{Re: Robert L. Shoemaker v. AHP (04-20094)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to have filed a severed and amended complaint within 60 days of severance pursuant to PTO No. 3770 7, 8, 10, 12.}

^{1. All claims of Martha S. Clenney, Edward A. Hay, Kathy D. Miller, Zeola T. Guy, Irene Taylor, Tanay T. Williams, Earnestine DeWalt, Regina Fitzgerald, Helen L. ming, Tonya K. Mosley, Pasquale Cipriani, Jofin E. McCue, Sandra Trotter, stacey S. Watson, Patricia J. Perry, Anderson W. Anderson, Mary Ann Bolt, Shylonda L. Lofton, Mae F. Granton, Sheila W. Laminack, Carl E. Love, Linda J. Wahlers, Mike K. Dubose, Yvonne M. Washington, E. Lynda Brooks, Nixon Nixon, Catherine E. Tiedman, Joann Abram, Margaret A. Barbour, Jacquelyn D. Stone, Dyan Jenkins, Paulette M. Abraham, Iris Merritt, Sandra J. Purdie, Dawn J. Oldham, Janet L. Shea, Connie A. McMartin, Anna Stroud, Eric S. Brown, Brenda W. Broadway-Jarvis, Eduardo G. Coronado, Deborah L. Ayler, Robert D. Fernandez, Kathy J. Thomas, Steven Scott, Joanne Matthews, Marilyn J. Cavin, Mary P. House, Ida M. Woodard, Sue L. Cahal, Meredith J. Hines, George R. Whitt, Barbara J. Hurley, Sarah Andres, Diana L. Gurnee, Wilma M. Vaughn, Jerry D. Lacey, Linda E. Morin, Jacquilyn A. Kilo, Nancy J. Formica. Ethel L. Lawson, Mary E. Brown, Donna J. Savage, Vickie L. Laplow, Pamela S. Smith, Roxanna L. Pease, Lynn J. Maxwell, Shazell D. Dixon, Lisa A. Flint, Gary P. Skardina, Lori K. Gibbs, Barbara Klein-Robuck, Sandra Jackson, Kim Johannan, Gwen I. Hansen, Vicki E. O’Keefe, Barbara L. Hook, Jesus Gayton, Sherri Morrow, Diane C. Bailey, Janice M. Tyler and Linda K. Kline v. AHP.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹¹⁰

^{Re: Carrie Alcantara v. Wyeth (04-21340)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to "dismiss/enforce Settlement Agreement and Pretrial Order No. 1415 against class members Carrie and Ronald Alcantara" is GRANTED;}

^{2. Plaintiffs’ intermediate opt-out action is dismissed with prejudice for the reason that plaintiff Carrie Alcantara is ineligible to exercise an intermediate opt-out under the terms of the Settlement Agreement; and}

^{3. The clerk of court is directed to mark this case closed.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹¹¹

^{Re: Mary A. Clement-Centrella v. Wyeth (04-22649)}

^{Plaintiff Mary A. Clement-Centrella advises the court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, without prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Mary A. Clement-Centrella and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff Mary A. Clement-Centreallas claims as to defendant Wyeth.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹¹²

^{Re: Sandra J. Dye v. Wyeth (03-20635)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Sandra J. Dye hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants Wyeth and Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Sandra J. Dye hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants Wyeth and Wyeth-Ayerst International Inc., with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Sandra J. Dye may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Sandra J. Dye and Defendants Wyeth and Wyeth-Ayerst International Inc., who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹¹³

^{Re: Christene M. Nettles v. Wyeth (04-22192)}

^{This Court, having considered the parties’ stipulation to Dismiss, FINDS that it should be GRANTED.}

^{It is, therefore ORDERED that the claims and causes of action of the following Plaintiff, Christine M. Nettles, are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the National Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹¹⁴

^{Re: Virginia N. Riley v. Wyeth (04-24125)}

^{COMES NOW Virgina N. Riley, Plaintiff in the above-referenced case, and advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes as to all Defendants in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Virginia N. Riley and Defendants stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff’s claims as to all Defendants.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the National Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹¹⁵

^{Re: Kathleen Lowry v. Wyeth (04-24930)}

^{This Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss, FINDS that it should be GRANTED.}

^{It is , therefore, ORDERED that the claims and causes of action of the following Plaintiff, Kathleen Lowry, are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the National Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹¹⁶

^{Re: Sonja K. Oonk v. Wyeth (04-24640)}

^{This Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss, FINDS that it should be GRANTED.}

^{It is , therefore, ORDERED that the claims and causes of action of the following Plaintiff, Sonja K. Oonk, are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the National Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹¹⁷

^{Re: Joyce K. Baker v. Wyeth (04-24102)}

^{This Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss, FINDS that it should be GRANTED.}

^{It is , therefore, ORDERED that the claims and causes of action of the following Plaintiff, Joyce K. Baker, are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the National Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹¹⁸

^{Re: Mary Ann Hartman v. Wyeth (04-24489)}

^{This Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss, FINDS that it should be GRANTED.}

^{It is , therefore, ORDERED that the claims and causes of action of the following Plaintiff, Mary Ann Hartman, are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the National Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹¹⁹

^{Re: Eva L. Davis v. Wyeth (03-20594)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{In the event that plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, Plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and Plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹²⁰

^{Re: Lola Boyle v. Wyeth (04-24068)}

^{LOLA BOYLE, Plaintiff in the above-referenced case, and advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to all Defendants in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)91)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff LOLA BOYLE and Defendant stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff’s claims.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹²¹

^{Re: Denise A. Ingham, As Provisional Tutrix of the Property of Rachel Ingham and Thomas Brant Barham, Minors v. Wyeth (03-20162)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned mater, those being Wyeth, James Miles Brooks, M.D. and M. James Brooks, Jr., M.D.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹²²

^{Cheryl Landrith v. Wyeth (04-21533)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), that the claims of Plaintiff, Cheryl Landrith, in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. Plaintiff further stipulates that she will only re-file her claims asserted in this cause, if at all, in federal court.}

^{This Stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹²³

^{Barbara Shelby v. Wyeth (04-21697)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), that the claims of Plaintiff, Barbara Shelby, in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This stipulation disposes of the only plaintiffs in the above listed action as against all named defendants.}

^{This Stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹²⁴

^{Re: Cathryn Lin and Quongjin Lin v. Wyeth (04-29413)}

^{COME NOW, the parties, by their respective counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and hereby stipulate and agree that the above-entitled action shall be dismissed with prejudice, all matters having been compromised or settled which were alleged or could have been alleged, with each party to bear their own costs.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹²⁵

^{Re: Carol E. Miras v. Wyeth (04-25129)}

^{This Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss, FINDS that it should be GRANTED.}

^{It is, therefore, ORDERED that the claims and causes of action of the following Plaintiff Carol E. Miras, are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the National Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹²⁶

^{Re: Michelle M. Howe v. Wyeth (04-23260)}

^{This Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss, FINDS that it should be GRANTED.}

^{It is, therefore, ORDERED that the claims and causes of action of the following Plaintiff Michelle M. Howe, are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the National Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹²⁷

^{Re: Michael H. Donahey v. Wyeth (04-23114)}

^{This Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss, FINDS that it should be GRANTED.}

^{It is, therefore, ORDERED that the claims and causes of action of the following Plaintiff Michael H. Donahey, are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the National Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹²⁸

^{Re: Regina Jones McMullen v. Wyeth (03-20235)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff Ronald D. Martin in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹²⁹

^{Re: Carolyn A. Ingram v. Weyth (03-20236)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff Lawrence W. Sparks in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹³⁰

^{Re: Bettie W. Noah v. Wyeth (03-20199)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff Daniel R. Peterson in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹³¹

^{Re: Linda Fletcher (Larry R. Moor0 v. Wyeth (04-28541)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff LARRY R. MOOR hereby dismisss with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff LARRY R. MOOR and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹³²

^{Re: Debra K. Leggett v. Wyeth (04-25827)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Debra K. Leggett hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Debra K. Leggett and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹³³

^{Re: Lori Sobkowski v. Wyeth (04-27154)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of the Wyeth defendants to dismiss fraudulently joined parties with prejudice is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants except Wyeth, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. are DISMISSED.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹³⁴

^{Re: Vicky Marie Gough v. AHP (04-27183)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the fraudulently joined defendant is GRANTED; and}

^{2. All claims against defendant Steven Spencer are DISMISSED.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹³⁵

^{Re: Anita Durham (04-21375) & Elva Dale Simon (04-20377 v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the fraudulently joined defendants is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and A.H. Robins company, Inc., are DISMISSED.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹³⁶

^{Re: Donna Crosby v. Wyeth (04-26700)}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the fraudulently joined defendants is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories are DISMISED.}

^5-2-2005

⁵¹³⁷

^{Re: Linda Latrice Batiste (04-20327), Peggy Cross (04-20203), Mary P. Guidry-Granger (04-20333). Elsie Hodges (04-20309). Marcella Hyder (04-20217), Marie A. Robinson (04-20322) & Melanie Sanford (04-20320) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motions of plaintiffs to remand in the seven above-captioned actions are DENIED;}

^{2. All defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and A. H. Robins Company, Inc. are DISMISSED;}

^{3. THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT David L. King in Guidry-Granger to transfer venue is DENIED as moot;}

^{4. The motions of defendant Dr. Samuel Bennett in Guidry-Granger to dismiss and to amend/correct motion to dismiss are DENIED as moot;}

^{5. The motion of defendant Dr. Bruce S. Terrill in Guidry-Granger to transfer venue is DENIED as moot;}

^{6. The motion of defendant Dr. Gary R. Allen in Guidry-Granger to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{7. The motion of defendant Dr. Irma Aguirre in Guidry-Granger to transfer venue is DENIED as moot;}

^{8. The motion of the attorney for defendant Brent Wallace to substitute counsel in Guidry-Granger is DENIED as moot;}

^{9. The motion of defendant Tamara Noak, M.D. in Guidry-Granger for summary judgment is DENIED as moot;}

^{10. The motion of defendant D. Sidney Boyd Chadwell in Guidry-Granger to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{11. The motion of defendant Richard M. Boatman in Hodges to transfer venue is DENIED as moot;}

^{12. The motion of defendant Catherine Maxwell-Hees, M.d. in Hodges to transfer venue is DENIED as moot;}

^{13. The motion of defendant D. Assad A. Sergie in Hodges to transfer venue is DENIED as moot;}

^{14. The motion of defendant Dr. Heriberto Salinas in Hodges to transfer venue is DENIED as moot;}

^{15. The motions of defendant Dr. Jose DeJesus in Hodges to transfer venue and to dismiss are DENIED s moot;}

^{16. The motion of defendant Frederick C. McDonough in Hodges to transfer venue is DENIED as moot;}

^{17. The motion of defendant Dr. Phillip M. Aronoff in Hodges to dismiss is DENIED as moot;}

^{18. The motion of attorney for Arthur Hadley to withdraw as counsel in Hodges is DENIED as moot;}

^{19. The motions of defendant Samuel Bennett in Sanford to dismiss and to amend/correct motion to dismiss are DENIED as moot;}

^{20. The motions of defendant John Francis Eichelberger in Sanford to dismiss are DENIED as moot; and}

^{21. The motion of defendant Dr. Sidney Boyd Chadwell Jr. in Sanford to dismiss is DENIED as moot.}

^5-23-2005

⁵¹³⁸

^{Re: Bettie W. Noah v. Wyeth (03-20199)}

^{AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff "Mr. Sullivan" (as he is identified in the December 30, 2002, First Amended Complaint in the above-captioned case) are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-3-2005

⁵¹³⁹

^{Re: Mark Sickles v. Fisons, Patrick E. Huff, D.O., d/b/a Luckiamute Clinic, Regence HMO Oregon, and Western Council of Industrial Workers-Timber Operators Council Health (98-20728)}

^{AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of Mark Sickles, personal representative of the estate of Carla Sickles, are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-3-2005

⁵¹⁴⁰

^{Re: Linda J. Genrty v. Wyeth (04-268330}

^{AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the fraudulently joined defendants is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth and Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., are DISMISSED.}

^5-3-2005

⁵¹⁴¹

^{Re: All Action}

^{STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO WYETH’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 2930}

^{It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED between Fleming & Associates, L.L.P. and Wyeth, through their respective counsel, that Fleming & Associates shall file its response in opposition to Wyeth’s Motion for Sanctions on or before May 5, 2005.}

^{This extension is for a period of less than 30 days. No prior extension has been requested or given in this matter.}

^5-4-2005

⁵¹⁴²

^{Re: Mary Beavers v. Wyeth (04-28526)}

^{AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of defendant Dr. Alec Law to dismiss the complaint as to him on the ground that he is fraudulently joined is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, are DISMISSED.}

^5-4-2005

⁵¹⁴³

^{Re: Jean E. Caryl v. Wyeth (04-29441)}

^{AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the fraudulently joined defendant is GRANTED; and}

^{2. All claims against defendant Dr. Jocques Kestleyn are DISMISSED.}

^5-4-2005

⁵¹⁴⁴

^{Re: Andrea Nightingale v. Wyeth (03-20384)}

^{AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the fraudulently joined defendants is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals are DISMISSED.}

^5-4-2005

⁵¹⁴⁵

^{Re: Lori Queen v. Wyeth (04-25835)}

^{AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of defendant Bill Baker to dismiss the claims against him is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants except Wyeth are DISMISSED.}

^5-4-2005

⁵¹⁴⁶

^{Re: Anita Crabtree v. Wyeth (04-20645)}

^{AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of plaintiffs to remand is DENIED as moot for the reason that the federal transferor court has already ruled on that motion;}

^{2. The motion of Wyeth to dismiss the fraudulently joined defendants is GRANTED; and}

^{3. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc. are DISMISSED.}

^5-4-2005

⁵¹⁴⁷

^{Re: Renee Allen (04-28524) & Judy Carpenter (04-28525) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motions of plaintiffs in the above-captioned actions to remand are DENIED;}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc. are DISMISSED; and}

^{3. The motion of defendant Dr. Alec Law in Judy Carpenter to dismiss is DENIED as moot.}

^5-4-20005

⁵¹⁴⁸

^{Re: Suzanne Combs v. Wyeth (04-28545)}

^{AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of plaintiff to remand is DENIED;}

^{2. All claims against defendant Dr. Rollie Edward Allen are DISMISSED; and}

^{3. The motion of defendant Dr. Rollie Edward Allen to dismiss is DENIED as moot.}

^5-4-2005

⁵¹⁴⁹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, on this 4th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the "motion for enforcement of lien for attorney’s fees and costs by Saunders & Walker, P.A., former counsel for class claimant, Barbara Edwards" is DENIED without prejudice.}

^5-4-2005

⁵¹⁵⁰

^{Re: Anthony Watson v. Wyeth (03-20296)}

^{AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pretrial Order No. 5106 is vacated solely as it relates to the claims of Joan Perkins Potter and Ronald Potter in Anthony Watston; and}

^{2. The claims of Joan Perkins Potter and Ronald Potter are reinstated for the reasons that these plaintiffs refiled as CIV.A. No. 04-21745.}

^5-4-2005

⁵¹⁵¹

^{Re: Thomas K. Irwin (03-20599) & Patricia Cubeta (03-20479) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the fraudulently joined defendants is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and A.H. Robins Company, Inc., are DISMISSED.}

^5-4-2005

⁵¹⁵²

^{Re: Sandra Sorrell (04-20086) & Lisa Phelps-Dorris (04-20096) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to have filed a severed and amended complaint within 60 days of severance pursuant to PTO No. 3770:}

^{1. All claims of Earnestine Williams, Mary Feldner, Carol Stiff, Ute Mark, Peggy Schemer, Ella Wilcox, Felecia Grayson, Carla Whitlatch, Mary Davis, Alberta Parrish, Joyce Madison, Lyle Songstad, Reggie Kaminsky, Paula Parker, Linda Aleba, mavis Jundt, Gina Lloyd, Murna Scott, Deborah Napier, Mary Davis Bambi Woodward, Virginia Curtis, Annette Stewart, Mamie Conrad Kim Cooley-Hedberg, Linda Stewart, Angel Cassity, Dora McClure, William J. Fox, Therese Middleton, Margaret Watson and Kathleen Heuer in Sandra Sorrell v. AHP; and}

^{2. All claims of Lenora Coombs, Jason Haws, Robin Boren, Doreen Cashdollar, Joanne Matthews, Joan Braun, Helen Alegria, Ruth Johnson, Betty Poole, Sheri Ferber, Myrna Spaeth, Velisa Smurthwaite, Brenda Loya, Cindy Evans, Nancy Hughes, Vikki Smith, Deborah Shoaf, Elma Lindquist, Phyllis Dunlap, Kimberlie March, Lana Montoya, Victor Fielder, Anita Chadwell, Robert Brown, Barin Dean, Klly Stewart, Myralee Elder, Tony S. Brown, Carmen Borden, Amy L. Lott, Lisa McPherson, Cynthia Snyder, Alberta Johnson, Carol Flanders and Carol G. Oertle in Linda Phelps-Dorris.}

^5-4-2005

⁵¹⁵³

^{Re: Barbara Jean Moore v. Wyeth (05-20247)}

^{AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the fraudulently joined defendants is GRANTED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants except Wyeth, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc. are DISMISSED.}

^5-5-2005

⁵¹⁵⁴

^{Re: Amy Sanford v. Wyeth (04-20169)}

^{AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pretrial Order No. 5105 is vacated solely as it relates to the claims of Ruby Shoffner and Shirley Wilson in Amy Sanford;}

^{2. The claims of Ruby Shoffner are reinstated for the reason that this plaintiff refiled as CIV.A. NO. 04-22008; and}

^{3. The claims of Shirley Wilson are reinstated for the reason that this plaintiff refiled as CIV.A. No. 04-22078.}

^5-5-2005

⁵¹⁵⁵

^{Re: Sandra Sorrell v. Wyeth (04-20086)}

^{AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. PTO No. 5152 is vacated solely as it relates to the claims of Carla J. Whitlatch and Mamie K. Conrad in Sandra Sorrell;}

^{2. The claims of Carla J. Whitlatch are reinstated for the reason that this plaintiff refiled as CIV.A. No. 04-22988; and}

^{3. The claims of Mamie K. Conrad are reinstated for the reason that this plaintiff refiled as CIV.A. No. 04-23781.}

^5-5-2005

⁵¹⁵⁶

^{Re: Lisa Phelps-Dorris v. AHP (04-20096)}

^{AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. PTO No. 5152 is vacated solely as it relates to the claims of Robert Brown, Carmen M. Borden and Alberta Johnson;}

^{2. The claims of Robert Brown are reinstated for the reason that this plaintiff refiled as CIV.A. No. 04-24108; and}

^{3. The claims of Alberta Johnson are reinstated for the reason that this plaintiff refiled as CIV.A. No. 04-24728.}

^5-5-2005

⁵¹⁵⁷

^{Re: Pamela Ellison (04-20099) & Mitzi Wilson (03-20280) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to have filed a severed and amended complaint within 60 days of severance pursuant to PTO No. 3770.}

^{1. All claims of Dorothy L. Proffitt, Delores B. Harrison, Carol Colwell, Arthurene J. Settle, Dawn M. Britt, Denise C. Myles, Gwen I. Hansen and Etta G. Daniel in Pamela Ellison v. AHP (04-20099); and}

^{2. All claims of Baryne Wayne Benson, David Allen and John Dover in Mitzi Wilson v. Wyeth (03-20280).}

^5-5-2005

⁵¹⁵⁸

^{Re: Joyce Ann Allen (03-20310), Paul Woodcock (03-20273) & Shirley Jobe (03-20232) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to have filed a severed and amended complaint within 60 days of severance pursuant to PTO No. 3770.}

^{1. All claims of Alda Thornhill in Joyce Ann Allen v. Wyeth (03-20310);}

^{2. All claims of Becky Garner in Paul Woodcock v. Wyeth (03-20273);}

^{3. All claims of Phyllis Gaye Petti, Sharon C. Barnett, Mary Haney and Cindy K. Knighton in Shirley Jobe v. Wyeth (03-20232).}

^5-5-2005

⁵¹⁵⁹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-205930}

^{IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED between Bobbe Scheiffler and the AHP Settlement Trust (the "Trust"), through their respective and undersigned counsel, that the Trust shall have an extension of time up to and including May 2, 2005 to respond to Bobbe Schieffler’s Motion to Compel the Trust to Accept and Provide Reimbursement for an Echocardiogram.}

^{This is the first such stipulation for extension of time, and does not exceed thirty days.}

^5-5-2005

⁵¹⁶⁰

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{WHEREAS, PTO No. 3882 directs that Class Counsel and Wyeth determine if High Level Claims within the scope of the parallel processing procedures are sufficiently complete within the meaning of the Settlement Agreement to permit making a determination of eligibility for Matrix Compensation benefits as a High Level Claim;}

^{WHEREAS, PTO No. 3882 directs that Wyeth review each completed High Level Claim and designate if the claim is payable, and if payable, the benefit level and amount of the claim;}

^{WHEREAS, PTO No. 3882 directs the Trust to aggregate all claims designated as Payable by Wyeth during the preceding month and to file with the Court a motion for an Order authorizing the Trust to pay the claims in accordance with the amount determined by Wyeth; and}

^{WHEREAS, during the preceding month, Wyeth designated the claims set forth on Schedule1 hereto as Payable at the benefit levels and amounts set forth therein.}

^{NOW, THEREFORE, this 5th day of May, 2005, upon consideration of the Motion of the AHP Settlement trust to Pay Claims Designated as Payable by Wyeth Pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 3882, and any response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Trust shall pay those claims designated as payable by Wyeth on Schedule 1 attached hereto, at the benefit levels and in the amount determined by Wyeth as set forth therein in accordance with PTO No. 3882. Payment under this Order is subject to the resolution of any outstanding subrogation claims pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement.}

^5-5-2005

⁵¹⁶¹

^{Re: Sarah Brooks (03-20318), Mike Cockrell (03-20626) & Jamie Woods (03-20272) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to have filed a severed and amended complaint within 60 days of severance pursuant to PTO No. 3770:}

^{1. All claims of Joan Perkins, Ronald Potter and Curtis Luckett in Sarah Brooks v. Wyeth CIV.A. 03-20318;}

^{2. All claims of Brenda Kelly, Jewelen Owens, Debra Parker, Vicky Patrick, Susie Powell, Constance Roberts, Mary Robertson, Ethel Smith, Dana Tidmore, Vonda Tullos, Gloria Vaughn, Pamela Walters and Belinda Williams in Mike Cockrell v. Wyeth CIV.A. No. 03-20626; and}

^{3. All claims of Lee Forest and Edgar Shoemaker in Jamie Woods v. Wyeth CIV.A. No. 03-20727.}

^5-5-2005

⁵¹⁶²

^{Re: Brenda Barnett (03-20239) & Jennifer Stimage (03-20230) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure of plaintiffs to have filed a severed and amended complaint within 60 days of severance pursuant to PTO No. 3770:}

^{1. All claims of Glean McAlpine and Albert Dear in Brenda Barnett v. Wyeth CIV.A. No. 03-20239; and}

^{2. All claims of Penny Allen, Jimmie Andrews, Patricia Armstong, Deana S. Baulch, Amy C. Clayton, Annalyn S. Clayton, Naomi S. Crocker, Sheila Diane Dilmore, Pamelia Doss, Patricia N. Honeycutt, Glenda Huffman, Tanya Johnson, Judy Jones, Charlene Kuykendall, Barbara Swords Kyle, Joyce Lloyd, Gwendolyn Pannell, Mary E. Perry, Terri Pierce, Patricia F. Reaves, Pamela Shook, Ethel Simmons, Reba Tackitt, Tarra Tate and Leslie Thomas in Jennifer Stimage v. Wyeth CIV.A. No. 03-20230.}

^5-5-2005

⁵¹⁶³

^{Re: Venice Holliday v. AHP (02-20188)}

^{AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The Report and Recommendation NO. 25 of the Special Master (as to Wyeth’s motion pursuant to PTO No. 2383 as to class member Venice Holliday) is AFFIRMED;}

^{2. "Wyeth’s motion pursuant to PTO No. 2383 as to class member Venice Holliday" (Doc. No. 205869 is GRANTED; and}

^{3. The claims of plaintiff Venice Holliday against all Wyeth-related defendants are dismissed.}

^5-6-2005

⁵¹⁶⁴

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The Report and Recommendation No. 21 of the Special Discovery Master (as to dismissal of various defendants from cases for lack of product identification) is AFFIRMED;}

^{2. The noted plaintiffs shall file conforming captions within 30 days; and}

^{3. The defendant listed on Exhibits A through U attached hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice.}

^5-6-2005

⁵¹⁶⁵

^{Re: Nancy Wells v. Wyeth (03-20613)}

^{AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that Pretrial Order No. 3856 is amended to add the following: all claims against Gate Pharmaceuticals and Smithkline Beecham Corporation are DISMISSED. See PTO nO. 2567, Anderson v. AHP CIV.A. No. 01-20182.}

^5-6-2005

⁵¹⁶⁶

^{Re: Ana Maria Dibienza v. Wyeth (03-20225)}

^{AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice for failure of plaintiff to have filed a severed and amended complaint within 60 days of severance pursuant to PTO No. 3770: all claims of Sandra Garrison, Geraldine Joyce, Vera Lechuga, Colleen Todd, Roanld Kincaid, Joni Johnson and Jacalyn Murray in Ana Maria DiBienza v. Wyeth CIV.A. No. 03-20225.}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁶⁷

^{Re: Alberta A. Roy (Geraldine E. Stewart) v. Wyeth (04-26970)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of Plaintiff Geraldine E. Stewart, one of the Plaintiffs in the above-captioned multi-plaintiff case, are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^{In the event that Plaintiff re-files any such claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, Plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and Plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^{Nothing in this order shall affect the claims and causes of action of any of the other Plaintiffs in this matter.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Geraldine E. Stewart and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁶⁸

^{Re: Elsie Hodges (Patricia Jeter) v. Wyeth (04-20309)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of Plaintiff Patricia Jeter in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^{Nothing in this order shall affect the claims and causes of action of any of the other Plaintiffs in this matter. .}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁶⁹

^{Re: Elsie Hodges (Opal Jones) v. Wyeth (04-20309)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of Plaintiff Opal Jones in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^{Nothing in this order shall affect the claims and causes of action of any of the other Plaintiffs in this matter.}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁷⁰

^{Re: Evelyn G. Nail v. Wyeth, AHP, A. H. Robins Company, Virginia Mallette, Patricia M. Tessendore & David P. Cauwels (05-20306)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the above-captioned action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the Defendants, Gene Heinrichs, M.D., Virginia Mallette, Patricia M. Tessendore and David P. Cauwels withe each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Evelyn G. Nail and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁷¹

^{Re: Sandra Bever v. Wyeth (04-20205)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of Sandra Bever in the above-captioned matter are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all named defendants , with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii). All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁷²

^{Re: Thelam T. Maynor v. Wyeth (04-21555)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of plaintiff Thelma T. Maynor in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^{In the event that plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁷³

^{Re: Regina Jones McMullen v. Wyeth (03-20235)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiffs David Roberts and Elizabeth Roberts in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁷⁴

^{Re: Regina Jones McMullen v. Wyeth (03-20235)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiffs Charles Killingsworth and Dorothy Killingsworth in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁷⁵

^{Re: Elsie Hodges (Shirley McAdoo) v. Wyeth (03-20309)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of plaintiff Shirley McAdoo, one of the Plaintiffs in the above-captioned multi-plaintiff case, are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^{In the event that plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^{Nothing in this order shall affect the claims and causes of action of any other plaintiff against any of defendants in this matter.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁷⁶

^{Re: Debbie Hoskins v. Wyeth (05-21027)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ordered that the Clerk of Court shall refund to Debbie Hoskins the $250.00 paid for the filing fee in the above-captioned action for the reason that she was the first-named plaintiff in Hoskins, et al v. Wyeth.}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁷⁷

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The Report and Recommendation No. 14 of the Special Discovery Master (as to class member Margie Fisher’s Motion for Protective Order) is AFFIRMED;}

^{2. "Class member Margie Fisher’s motion for protective order relating to her motion for relief from PTO No. 1238" (Doc. No. 204921) is GRANTED as revised by "class member Margie Fisher’s motion re: Report and Recommendation No. 14 of the Special Discovery Master (as to class member Margie Fisher’s motion for protective order) and declaration of Eric Wildgrube" (Doc. No. 206282)’}

^{3. "Class member Margie Fisher’s motion re: Report and Recommendation No. 14 of the Special Discovery Maser (as to class member Margie Fisher’s motion for protective order) and declaration of Eric Wildgrube" (Doc. No. 206282) is GRANTED; and}

^{4. A protective order will be issued.}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁷⁸

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that certain materials relating to Class Member Margie Fisher’s Motion for Relief From PTO No. 1238 shall be protected as follows:}

^{1. This protective order shall govern the treatment of Confidential Information (as defined in paragraph 2 below) produced or obtained either by Wyeth or Ms. Fisher in proceedings relating to Ms. Fisher’s Motion for Relief from PTO No. 1238.}

^{2. "Confidential Information" shall mean any document, file, portions of files, transcribed testimony, or response to a discovery request, including any extract, abstract, chart, summary, note or copy made therefrom ("Document") that quotes, contains, represents, characterizes, describes or depicts neuropsychological testing materials published by the Psychological Corporation or any other corporation or individual and employed by any psychologist or neuropsychologist in assessing Ms. Fisher’s neuropsychological condition.}

^{3. All Confidential Information may only be disclosed to the following persons, and only for the purpose of the Action:}

^{A. This court, including court personnel, court reporters, and persons operating video recording equipment at depositions in this action;}

^{B. Counsel who have appeared of record for a party in this action and partners, associates, legal assistants, or other employees of such counsel assisting in the prosecution or defense of this action;}

^{C. The parties to this action; and}

^{D. Persons retained by the parties or their attorneys to assist in the prosecution or defense of this action (including consultants or expert witnesses, and third-party vendors, and their employees, retained by the parties or counsel who are involved in one or more aspects of copying, microfilming, reorganizing, filing, coding, converting, storing or retrieving data).}

^{4. Prior to a party’s counsel disclosing confidential information to a persons described in subparagraphs 4(c), the disclosing party shall deliver a copy of this Order to such persons and obtain the declaration in the form attached as Exhibit A, signed and dated by such persons.}

^{5. The individuals authorized to review confidential information pursuant to this protective order shall hold confidential information in confidence and shall not divulge the confidential information, either orally or in writing to any other person, entity or government agency unless authorized to do so by this protective order or other Court order.}

^{6. The party’s counsel who discloses confidential information shall take all steps reasonable and appropriate to ensuring compliance with the terms of this protective order with respect to persons to whom such confidential information is disclosed and shall obtain and retain the original declarations signed by qualified recipients of confidential information.}

^{7. No copies of confidential information shall be made except by or on behalf of counsel in this litigation for work product purposes or for review by experts or parties in this case. Any such copies shall be made and used solely for purposes of this litigation.}

^{8. The termination of this action shall not relieve counsel or other persons obligated hereunder from their responsibility to maintain the confidentiality of confidential information pursuant to this protective order, and the court shall retain continuing jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this protective order.}

^{9. By agreeing to the entry of this protective order, the parties adopt no position as to the authenticity or admissibility of documents produced subject to it. Neither the taking of any action in accordance with the provisions of this protective order, nor the failure to object thereto, shall be construed as a waiver of any claim or defense in this action.}

^{10. Nothing in this protective order shall preclude any party from filing a motion seeking further or different protection from the court under rule 26© of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or from filing a motion with respect to the manner in which confidential information shall be treated at trial.}

^5-10-2005

⁵¹⁷⁹

^{Re: Loretta Grant v. Wyeth (03-20330)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. PTO No. 5105 is vacated solely as it relates to the claims of Thomas Stegall in Loregga Grant; and}

^{2. The claims of Thomas Stegall are reinstated for the reason that this plaintiff refiled as CIV.A. No. 04-23987.}

^5-11-2005

⁵¹⁸⁰

^{Re: Brenda Loper v. AHP (04-20620)}

^{This cause is before the Court on the Stipulation of the parties that Wyeth will have until and including May 27, 2005, in which to serve a response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand or in the Alternative Motion to Abstain and Remand.}

^{Having considered the Stipulation, the Court finds that it well taken and hereby grants Wyeth an extension to and including May 27, 2005, in which to serve a response and memorandum of authorities in opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand or in the Alternative Motion to Abstain and Remand.}

^5-11-2005

⁵¹⁸¹

^{Re: Paul Woodcock v. Wyeth (03-20273)}

^{AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. PTO No. 5158 is vacated solely as it relate to the claims of Becky Garner (a/k/a Sara Garner) in Paul Woodcock, et al. v. Wyeth CIV.A. No. 03-20273; and}

^{2. The claims of Becky Garner are reinstated for the reason that this plaintiff refiled as CIV.A. No. 04-24017.}

^5-11-2005

⁵¹⁸²

^{Re: All Actions - UNDER SEAL -}

^{AND NOW, May 11, 2005, upon consideration of the PMC’s Motion for Release and Use of Funds from the MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account, established by Gregory Miller, Esquire, Escrow Agent, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that said Motion is GRANTED and Gregory Miller, Esquire, is directed to make payment on invoices totaling $123,174.49 to the PMC Fen Phen Litigation Account.}

^5-11-2005

⁵¹⁸³

^{Re: Janet S. Aligah (04-23153), Olivia M. Anthony (04-23133), Betty Batte (04-23137), Gloria Collier (04-23143), Ira Ann Durden (04-23747), Ruby Estes (04-23156), Blanche Feathers (04-26197), Lenny K. Holden (04-23135), Andrew D. Richardson (04-23134), Catherine Kaerwen Simmons (04-23136), Betty J. Tedford (04-23138) & Delois Wall (04-23157) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of plaintiffs to remand in the above-captioned actions are DENIED; and}

^{2. All defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth are DISMISSED.}

^5-12-2005

⁵¹⁸⁴

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of class counsel to impose a bond on appellants Angela Duffy and Debra Rhea in connection with their appeal of this court’s PTO No. 4567 is GRANTED; and}

^{2. Appellants forthwith shall post a bond in the amount of $25,000.00. The purpose of said bond is to ensure the payment of costs incurred by class counsel should the class prevail on appeal.}

^5-12-2005

⁵¹⁸⁵

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Report and Recommendation No. 16 of Special Discovery Master (as to Fleming & Associates, L.L.P.’s proposed discovery requests) is AFFIRMED in part and MODIFIED in part;}

^{2. Report and Recommendation No. 16 is MODIFIED as it pertains to Request for Production No. 2. Request for Production No. 2 is GRANTED in its entirety; and}

^{3. Report and Recommendation No. 16 is otherwise AFFIRMED.}

^5-12-2005

⁵¹⁸⁶

^{Re: 160 California Complaints v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motions of plaintiffs to remand in the above-captioned actions to the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California are DENIED; and}

^{2. All defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth are DISMISSED.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁸⁷

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Claimant Geaney Evans is not entitled to Matrix A-1, Level II benefits.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁸⁸

^{Re: Sarah Brooks v. Wyeth (03-20318)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. PTO NO. 5161 is vacated solely as it relates to the claims of Curtis Luckett in Sarah Brooks v. Wyeth; and}

^{2. The claims of Curtis Luckett are reinstated for the reason that plaintiff refiled as CIV.A. No. 21734.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁸⁹

^{Re: Brenda Barnett v. Wyeth (03-20239)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. PTO NO. 5162 is vacated solely as it relates to the claims of Glean McAlpine in Brenda Barnett v. Wyeth; and}

^{2. The claims of Glean McAlpine are reinstated for the reason that this plaintiff refiled as CIV.A. No. 04-21762.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁹⁰

^{Re: Jamie Woods v. Wyeth (03-20272)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. PTO No. 5161 is vacated solely as it relates to the claims of Lee Forest and Edgar Shoemaker in Jamie Woods;}

^{2. The claims of Lee Forest are reinstated for the reason that these plaintiffs refiled as CIV.A. NO. 04-21785; and}

^{3. The claims of Edgar Shoemaker are reinstated for the reason that this plaintiff refiled as CIV.A. No. 04-21796.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁹¹

^{Re: Shirley Cormier (04-20331), Summer Fowler (04-23145), Ouida Garrett (04-20613), Debra Kollman (04-20401), Maryann McBrayer (03-20534) & Margaret Tipping (04-20199) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in PTO NO. 5083, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of Wyeth to dismiss fraudulently joined defendants in the following action s is DENIED as moot: Fowler, Garrett, Kollman & Tipping; and}

^{2. The motion of defendants Eckerd Corporation, Randall’s Food and Drugs, Inc., and Randall’s Food Markets, Inc. for summary judgment in McBrayer is DENIED as moot.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁹²

^{Re: Marie Joiner v. Wyeth (03-20394)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in PTO No. 5090 it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of defendants Gate Pharmaceuticals to dismiss is DENIED as moot; and}

^{2. The motion of plaintiff to remand is DENIED as moot.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁹³

^{Re: Martha Green v. Wyeth (03-20234)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, for the reasons se forth in PTO NO. 4202, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of counsel for plaintiff Gwendolyn Lowe to withdraw as counsel is DENIED as moot.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁹⁴

^{Re: Jean Ramsey v. Wyeth (03-20344)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in PTO No. 3339, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The claims against all defendants except Wyeth are DISMISSED; and}

^{2. The motions of counsel for the following defendants to withdraw and/or substitute counsel are DENIED as moot: Coldwater Pharmacey, Iuka Discount Drugs, May’s Pharmacy, FamilyMeds Pharmacy, RX Express of Tueplo, Delton More Discount Drugs, and Super Sav-on Durgs.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁹⁵

^{Re: Wylene L. Alston (04-26199) & Carolyn Alvarez (04-28540) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motions of plaintiffs to remand in the above-captioned actions are DENIED;}

^{2. All defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth are DISMISSED; and}

^{3. The motion of defendant William A. Hendricks in Alston v. Wyeth to dismiss is DENIED as moot.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁹⁶

^{Re: Kathy A. Baker (04-21113), Stephanie Bankston (04-21068), Jack N. Foty (04-21119), Betty Ann Kowis (04-20277), Joseph Kowis (04-20288) & Cindi Nelson (03-20348) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of counsel for defendant Arthur Hadley to withdraw as counsel in the above-captioned actions is DENIED as moot for the reason that all claims against htis defendant have been dismissed.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁹⁷

^{Re: Marilyn D. Jones v. Wyeth (04-25906)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff Marilyn D. Jones in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁹⁸

^{Re: Karen E. Miller (Margaret D. Worley) v. Wyeth (04-28609)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of plaintiff Margaret D. Worley, one of the plaintiffs in the above-captioned multi-plaintiff case, are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the nationwide class action settlement agreement with Wyeth.}

^{In the event that plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^{Nothing in this order shall affect the claims and causes of action of any of the other plaintiffs in this matter.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Margaret D. Worley and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-17-2005

⁵¹⁹⁹

^{Re: Linda Criswell, widow of Lee Kenneth Criswell v. AHP (05-20629)}

^{COMES NOW the plaintiff, Linda Criswell, and the defendants, AHP, Wyeth-Ayers Laboratories, division of AHP and A.H. Robins Company, and stipulate to the dismissal of plaintiff’s claims as to said defendants in the above-styled and numbered cause with prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs and counsel fees. Due to the fact that plaintiff did not file an initial, intermediate or back-end opt-out form, plaintiff remains in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement and must pursue any rights she may have, individually or on behalf of here deceased husband, exclusively from funds created thereunder.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²⁰⁰

^{Re: Marie Shannon v. AHP (04-29450)}

^{COMES NOW the plaintiff, Marie Shannon, and the defendants, AHP, Wyeth-Ayers Laboratories, division of AHP and A.H. Robins Company, and stipulate to the dismissal of plaintiff’s claims as to said defendants in the above-styled and numbered cause with prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs and counsel fees. Due to the fact that plaintiff did not file an initial, intermediate or back-end opt-out form, plaintiff remains in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement and must pursue any rights she may have, individually or on behalf of here deceased husband, exclusively from funds created thereunder.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²⁰¹

^{Re: Karen E. Miller (Jan Steffe) v. Wyeth (04-28609)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of plaintiff Jan Steffe, one of the plaintiffs in the above-captioned multi-plaintiff case, are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the nationwide class action settlement agreement with Wyeth.}

^{In the event that plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^{Nothing in this order shall affect the claims and causes of action of any of the other plaintiffs in this matter.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Jan Steffe and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²⁰²

^{Re: Lisa J. Miner v. Wyeth (04-26323)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Lisa J. Miner hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Lisa J. Miner may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Lisa J. Miner and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²⁰³

^{Re: Marianne Williams v. Wyeth (04-26902)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Kelly D. Williams, Executor of the Estate of Marianne Williams hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear their own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Marianne Williams may later accrue under the nationwide class action settlement agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Kelly D. Williams, Executor of the Estate of Marianne Williams and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²⁰⁴

^{Re: Kenneth Kaplan v. Wyeth (04-25282)}

^{Danielle Kaplan, Administrator of the Estate of Kenneth Kaplan, Plaintiff in the above-referenced case, advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to all Defendants in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Danielle Kaplan, Administrator of the Estate of Kenneth Kaplan and Defendant stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff’s claims.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the National Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²⁰⁵

^{Re: Erma Bennett v. Wyeth (04-20996)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Erma Bennett hereby dismisses with prejudice this This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Erma Bennett and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^{action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Erma Bennett may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²⁰⁶

^{Re: Joyce M. Borowiak v. Wyeth (04-29841)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Joyce M. Borowiak hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Joyce M. Borowiak may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Joyce M. Borowiak and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter}

^5-17-2005

⁵²⁰⁷

^{Re: Victoria Castillo v. Wyeth (04-26439)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Victoria Castillo hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Stipulation and Order shall be subject to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Victoria Castillo and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter}

^5-17-2005

⁵²⁰⁸

^{Re: Ellen Dee Clements v. Wyeth (04-22648)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Ellen Dee Clements hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Stipulation and Order shall be subject to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Ellen Dee Clements and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter}

^5-17-2005

⁵²⁰⁹

^{Re: Sally A. Nystrom v. Wyeth (05-20251)}

^{Plaintiff Sally A. Nystrom, by her undersigned counsel, agrees to dismiss all of her claims against defendant Jerry W. Swenson, M.D. , with prejudice and without costs taxed to either party, pursuant to Rule 41(a), Fed.R.Civ.P.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²¹⁰

^{Re: Peggy Pierson v. Wyeth (04-26672)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the part of Plaintiff’s claims based on symptoms indicative of PPH originally pled in her Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges, inter alia, injury in the form of PPH in paragraphs 10, 16(b), 26(a), 26(d) and 26(e).}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^{In the event Plaintiff meets the definition of PPH as defined by the criteria set forth in Sections I.46 and I.53 of the National Settlement Agreement and re-files a claim or action, Plaintiff may re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and Plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Peggy Pierson and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, those being Wyeth, AhP Subsidiary Holding Corporation, and Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²¹¹

^{Re: Duree Saltee v. Wyeth (04-21587)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Duree Saltee hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to the defendants Wyeth, with each party to bear their own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Duree Saltee may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Duree Saltee and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²¹²

^{Re: Alma Quan v. Wyeth (04-26563)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Alma Quan hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to the defendants Wyeth, with each party to bear their own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Alma Quan may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Alma Quan and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²¹³

^{Re: Sheila Geeslin v. Wyeth (05-20217)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff Natividad Pisaro in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal shall not affect any rights that this plaintiff may have under the Accelerated Implementation Option of the Nationwide Class Action Settlement of the litigation against Wyeth relating to the diet drugs Pondimin and Redux.}

^{This Stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²¹⁴

^{Re: Mary L. Showalter v. Wyeth (04-24171)}

^{Plaintiff Mary l. Showalter advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Mary L. Showalter and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Mary L. Showalter’s claims as to defendant Wyeth.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²¹⁵

^{Re: Darlene B. Borget v. Wyeth (04-24065)}

^{Plaintiff Darlene B. Borget advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Darlene B. Borget and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Darlene B. Borget’s claims as to defendant Wyeth.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²¹⁶

^{Re: Coral J. Bateman v. Wyeth (04-24115)}

^{Plaintiff Carol J. Batemanr advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Carol J. Batemen and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Coral J. Batemen’s claims as to defendant Wyeth.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²¹⁷

^{Re: Bonnie J. Allred (Michael D. James) v. Wyeth (04-23160)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Michael D. James hereby dismisses with prejudice this action ast to all defendants with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Michael D. James may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Michael D. James and all partes named as defendants by Michael D. James who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, Wyeth and Dr. Dorothy Merritt.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²¹⁸

^{Re: Lynda Bell (Maxine Lewis) v. Wyeth (04-26581)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Maxine Lewis hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Maxine Lewis may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Maxine Lewis and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²¹⁹

^{Re: Mary Beatty v. Wyeth (04-26532)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Mary Beatty hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Mary Beatty may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Mary Beatty and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²²⁰

^{Re: Jackqulyn Bodenstedt v. Wyeth (04-26407)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Jackulyn Bodenstedt hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Jackqulyn Bodenstedt may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Jackqulyn Bodenstedt and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²²¹

^{Re: Jeanne S. Gilbert v. Wyeth (04-26538))}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Jeanne S. Gilbert hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Jeanne S. Gilbert may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Jeanne S. Gilbert and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²²²

^{Re: Charlene Hatley v. Wyeth (04-26673)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the part of Plaintiff’s claims based on symptoms indicative of PPH originally pled in her Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges, inter alia, injury in the form of PPH in paragraphs 10, 16(b), 26(a), 26(d) and 26(e).}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^{In the event Plaintiff meets the definition of PPH as defined by the criteria set forth in Sections I.46 and I.53 of the National Settlement Agreement and re-files a claim or action, Plaintiff may re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and Plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Peggy Pierson and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, those being Wyeth, AhP Subsidiary Holding Corporation, and Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²²³

^{Re: Wanda T. Kizer v. Wyeth (04-23745)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff Elnora Haslett in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal shall not affect any of the rights that this plaintiff may have under the Accelerated Implementation Option of the Nationwide Class Action Settlement of the litigation against Wyeth relating to the diet drugs Pondimin and Redux.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²²⁴

^{Re: Regina Jones McMullen v. Wyeth (03-20235)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff "Mr. Caldwell" (as he is identified in the December 30, 2002, First Amended Complain in the above-captioned case) are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²²⁵

^{Re: Linda M. Smith v. Wyeth (04-21694)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED anRe: d DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff Linda M. Smith in the above captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record}

^5-17-2005

⁵²²⁶

^{Re: Evelyn Johnson v. Wyeth (04-25905)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff Evelyn Johnson in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-17-2005

⁵²²⁷

^{Re: Virginia N. Cunningham v. Wyeth (04-26053)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff Virginia Cunningham in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-18-2005

⁵²²⁸

^{Re: Martha Hill v. Wyeth (04-24037)}

^{AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of plaintiffs to remand in the above-captioned action is DENIED; and}

^{2. All defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth are DISMISSED.}

^5-18-2005

⁵²²⁹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, on this 18th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Claimant Susan Black is not entitled to Matrix A-1, Level II benefits.}

^5-18-2005

⁵²³⁰

^{Re: All Actions}

^{It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED between Fleming & Associates, L.L.P. and Wyeth, through their respective counsel, that Fleming & Associates shall file its response in opposition to Wyeth’s Second Omnibus Motion to Compel on or before May 20, 2005.}

^{This extension is for a period of less than 30 days. No prior extension has been requested or given in this matter.}

^5-18-2005

⁵²³¹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of Deborah E. Warren and Donald L. Warren for echocardiogram screening (Doc. No. 203974) is GRANTED;}

^{2. Claimants Deborah E. Warren and Donald L. Warren shall have an extension of ninety days from the date of this order in which to obtain an echocardiogram through the screening program; and}

^{3. The Trust is ordered to assist counsel for claimants in making an appointment for these echocardiograms.}

^5-18-2005

⁵²³²

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2005, upon consideration of the Escrow Agent’s Twenty-First Petition for Release of Funds from the MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account to Pay Refunds, submitted under seal, it is hereby ORDERED that said petition is granted and PTO No. 5232(A) shall be filed under seal.}

^5-18-2005

^5232A

^{Re: All Actions - FILED UNDER SEAL}

^5-20-2005

⁵²³³

^{Re: Diana Applegate v. Wyeth (04-21437)}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2005, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The joint motion of the parties to dismiss the complaint with prejudice as to all named defendants is GRANTED; and}

^{2. Each party is to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²³⁴

^{Re: Cathy McCarty v. Wyeth (03-20306)}

^{AND NOW, this20th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ordered that the motion of plaintiff to remand is DENIED as moot for the reason that all claims against the non-diverse defendant have been dismissed.}

^2-20-2005

⁵²³⁵

^{Re: Minnie White v. Wyeth (05-20016)}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of plaintiffs to remand is DENIED; and}

^{2. All defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth, Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, and Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. are DISMISSED.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²³⁶

^{Re: Regina Uwalaka v. Wyeth (03-20301)}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ordered that the motion of plaintiff to remand is DENIED as moot for the reason that all claims against the non-diverse defendants have been dismissed.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²³⁷

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimants: Cira Ayala-Saget, Jean Davis, Sandra L. Katz & Lynda Vanderspuy}

^{ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RELATING TO AUDITED CLAIMS OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED CLAIMANTS}

^{The Court has received Applications for Issuance of Orders to show Cause ("Applications"), filed by the AHP Settlement Trust ("Trust"), relating to the audited claims of the above-referenced Claimants. Accordingly, pursuant to the Rules for the Audit of Matrix Compensation Claims ("Audit Rules"), approved in Pretrial Order No. 2457, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimants must show cause why the trust’s requests for relief should not be granted.}

^{It is further ORDERED that these matters are referred to the Special Master for further proceedings. The Court directs that, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, the Trust shall serve upon the Special Master documentation to support its Applications, including: 1. Detailed statements of the case, as described in Rule 23 of the audit rules; 2. Attestation forms completed by auditing cardiologists for the se claims; 3. Auditing cardiologists’ worksheets; 4. Any and all other materials submitted to and/or completed by auditing cardiologists’ and 5. The audit files.}

^{Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Audit Rules, Claimants may submit responses to the Special Master within 21 days after service of the Trust’s supporting documentation. If any claimant fails to file a response, or if any claimant requests the special master to proceed without a response, the special master shall proceed in accordance with the audit rules.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²³⁸

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimants: Cassandra M. Albers, Terri A. Almond, Debbie Baumgartner, Pamela Bertoch, Anne Cannon, Beryl Clark, Johnny Dean, Robert Evans, Connie R. Franklin, Lorilee A. Gill, Kimberly A. Johnson, Debra A. Keller, Ygnacio Lopez, Catherine Loveless, Pamela McCoy, Lorraine A. Morris, Penny Mueller, Linda M. Pflug, Brandy Swofford & Christy Verstraete}

^{ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RELATING TO AUDITED CLAIMS OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED CLAIMANTS}

^{The Court has received Applications for Issuance of Orders to show Cause ("Applications"), filed by the AHP Settlement Trust ("Trust"), relating to the audited claims of the above-referenced Claimants. Accordingly, pursuant to the Rules for the Audit of Matrix Compensation Claims ("Audit Rules"), approved in Pretrial Order No. 2807, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimants must show cause why the trust’s requests for relief should not be granted.}

^{It is further ORDERED that these matters are referred to the Special Master for further proceedings. The Court directs that, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, the Trust shall serve upon the Special Master documentation to support its Applications, including: 1. Detailed statements of the case, as described in Rule 23 of the audit rules; 2. Attestation forms completed by auditing cardiologists for the se claims; 3. Auditing cardiologists’ worksheets; 4. Any and all other materials submitted to and/or completed by auditing cardiologists’ and 5. The audit files.}

^{Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Audit Rules, Claimants may submit responses to the Special Master within 21 days after service of the Trust’s supporting documentation. If any claimant fails to file a response, or if any claimant requests the special master to proceed without a response, the special master shall proceed in accordance with the audit rules.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²³⁹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimants: Jame R. Ballard, Regina M. Bennett, Emily M. Brinston, Shannon C. Butler, Arla J. Cochran, Cheryl K. Dawson, Estate of Mary F. Doherty, Donna Gernandt, John C. Gross, Christine Haase, Glenda S. Macy, Kenneth Moore, Constance s. Murata, Janet A. Powell, Kimberly J. Swanson, Shauna Trimm, Sandy Watson, Margaret R. Williams & Marianne Wright}

^{ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RELATING TO AUDITED CLAIMS OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED CLAIMANTS}

^{The Court has received Applications for Issuance of Orders to show Cause ("Applications"), filed by the AHP Settlement Trust ("Trust"), relating to the audited claims of the above-referenced Claimants. Accordingly, pursuant to the Rules for the Audit of Matrix Compensation Claims ("Audit Rules"), approved in Pretrial Order No. 2807, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimants must show cause why the trust’s requests for relief should not be granted.}

^{It is further ORDERED that these matters are referred to the Special Master for further proceedings. The Court directs that, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, the Trust shall serve upon the Special Master documentation to support its Applications, including: 1. Detailed statements of the case, as described in Rule 23 of the audit rules; 2. Attestation forms completed by auditing cardiologists for the se claims; 3. Auditing cardiologists’ worksheets; 4. Any and all other materials submitted to and/or completed by auditing cardiologists’ and 5. The audit files.}

^{Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Audit Rules, Claimants may submit responses to the Special Master within 21 days after service of the Trust’s supporting documentation. If any claimant fails to file a response, or if any claimant requests the special master to proceed without a response, the special master shall proceed in accordance with the audit rules.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²⁴⁰

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimants: Delores Bonnett, Russell S. Chapman, Jean Coomeaux, Wanda M. Cooper, Rex E. Crim, Billie Daniel, Leola Haden, Peggy S. Hatten, Judy Holmes, Sharon Hughes, Jerald Jensen, Kathleen K. Kallas, Debbie Klatt, Cleo I. Moriarity, Nancy Neal, Linda Potter, Sharon Rager, Olivia Rich, Angela K. Twete, & Teresa Whitehead}

^{ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RELATING TO AUDITED CLAIMS OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED CLAIMANTS}

^{The Court has received Applications for Issuance of Orders to show Cause ("Applications"), filed by the AHP Settlement Trust ("Trust"), relating to the audited claims of the above-referenced Claimants. Accordingly, pursuant to the Rules for the Audit of Matrix Compensation Claims ("Audit Rules"), approved in Pretrial Order No. 2807, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimants must show cause why the trust’s requests for relief should not be granted.}

^{It is further ORDERED that these matters are referred to the Special Master for further proceedings. The Court directs that, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, the Trust shall serve upon the Special Master documentation to support its Applications, including: 1. Detailed statements of the case, as described in Rule 23 of the audit rules; 2. Attestation forms completed by auditing cardiologists for the se claims; 3. Auditing cardiologists’ worksheets; 4. Any and all other materials submitted to and/or completed by auditing cardiologists’ and 5. The audit files.}

^{Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Audit Rules, Claimants may submit responses to the Special Master within 21 days after service of the Trust’s supporting documentation. If any claimant fails to file a response, or if any claimant requests the special master to proceed without a response, the special master shall proceed in accordance with the audit rules.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²⁴¹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimants: Bette Bloxham, Virginia S. Brown, Melinda M. Browning, Debra Y. Champagne, Mary Jeffirs, Ned D. Jenne, Honey Linton, Leslie Logar, Elizabeth H. Morgan, Melissa D. Morris, Harold Norman, Vickie Nostrom, Karen Osborne, Patsy Peters, Betty L. Pettingill, Freda G. Simmons, Nancy K. Sloane, Patricia A. Turner, Jamie Villarreal, & Rebecca Vincnet}

^{ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RELATING TO AUDITED CLAIMS OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED CLAIMANTS}

^{The Court has received Applications for Issuance of Orders to show Cause ("Applications"), filed by the AHP Settlement Trust ("Trust"), relating to the audited claims of the above-referenced Claimants. Accordingly, pursuant to the Rules for the Audit of Matrix Compensation Claims ("Audit Rules"), approved in Pretrial Order No. 2807, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimants must show cause why the trust’s requests for relief should not be granted.}

^{It is further ORDERED that these matters are referred to the Special Master for further proceedings. The Court directs that, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, the Trust shall serve upon the Special Master documentation to support its Applications, including: 1. Detailed statements of the case, as described in Rule 23 of the audit rules; 2. Attestation forms completed by auditing cardiologists for the se claims; 3. Auditing cardiologists’ worksheets; 4. Any and all other materials submitted to and/or completed by auditing cardiologists’ and 5. The audit files.}

^{Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Audit Rules, Claimants may submit responses to the Special Master within 21 days after service of the Trust’s supporting documentation. If any claimant fails to file a response, or if any claimant requests the special master to proceed without a response, the special master shall proceed in accordance with the audit rules.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²⁴²

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimants: Joe M. Black, Jr., Martha M. Brown, Debbie Crank, John A. Cuccia, Nncy L. Dickey, David S. Hudson, Gilbert L. Johnson, Laurie M. Jordan, Shelli Lamphere-Cianci, Barbara A. Lewis, Gina D. Plumlee, Marie Prince, Jeanne Y. Smith Elida S. Stembridge, Barbara Trigg, diane Trotter, Midge A. Tschudy, Greta B. Wadlington, Debra D. Williams & Marie Wyatt}

^{ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RELATING TO AUDITED CLAIMS OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED CLAIMANTS}

^{The Court has received Applications for Issuance of Orders to show Cause ("Applications"), filed by the AHP Settlement Trust ("Trust"), relating to the audited claims of the above-referenced Claimants. Accordingly, pursuant to the Rules for the Audit of Matrix Compensation Claims ("Audit Rules"), approved in Pretrial Order No. 2807, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimants must show cause why the trust’s requests for relief should not be granted.}

^{It is further ORDERED that these matters are referred to the Special Master for further proceedings. The Court directs that, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, the Trust shall serve upon the Special Master documentation to support its Applications, including: 1. Detailed statements of the case, as described in Rule 23 of the audit rules; 2. Attestation forms completed by auditing cardiologists for the se claims; 3. Auditing cardiologists’ worksheets; 4. Any and all other materials submitted to and/or completed by auditing cardiologists’ and 5. The audit files.}

^{Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Audit Rules, Claimants may submit responses to the Special Master within 21 days after service of the Trust’s supporting documentation. If any claimant fails to file a response, or if any claimant requests the special master to proceed without a response, the special master shall proceed in accordance with the audit rules.}

^5-20-2004

⁵²⁴³

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimants: Loraine H. Barrowman, Gaylene J. Beverly, Erma R. Cleeton, Kathy S. Cody, Marcia L. Cohen, Rosalie Derr, Michael B. Dods, Carolyn Fayall, Darla J. Johnson, Michael Lopez, Patricia A. Maccarino, Jeanette Miller, Cynthia A. Renk, Kristi R. Saul, Shanna L. Shurtliff, Madonna Talley, Claire M. Terrell, Adrienne Walker, Wanda Walker & Janet Wright}

^{ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RELATING TO AUDITED CLAIMS OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED CLAIMANTS}

^{The Court has received Applications for Issuance of Orders to show Cause ("Applications"), filed by the AHP Settlement Trust ("Trust"), relating to the audited claims of the above-referenced Claimants. Accordingly, pursuant to the Rules for the Audit of Matrix Compensation Claims ("Audit Rules"), approved in Pretrial Order No. 2807, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimants must show cause why the trust’s requests for relief should not be granted.}

^{It is further ORDERED that these matters are referred to the Special Master for further proceedings. The Court directs that, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, the Trust shall serve upon the Special Master documentation to support its Applications, including: 1. Detailed statements of the case, as described in Rule 23 of the audit rules; 2. Attestation forms completed by auditing cardiologists for the se claims; 3. Auditing cardiologists’ worksheets; 4. Any and all other materials submitted to and/or completed by auditing cardiologists’ and 5. The audit files.}

^{Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Audit Rules, Claimants may submit responses to the Special Master within 21 days after service of the Trust’s supporting documentation. If any claimant fails to file a response, or if any claimant requests the special master to proceed without a response, the special master shall proceed in accordance with the audit rules.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²⁴⁴

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimants: Sherryl Allan, Robert Baumgardner, Euretha Carswell, Nancy Edington, Helen Goodman, William W. Hanson, Cathy Jennings, Shallie L. Johnson, Kathryn A. Keel, Martha J. Kempter, Jesse Lillard, Rosemary Marsh, Jeri Newman, Robert L. Olsen, James S. Owens, Brigette S.Ratzlaff, Edith Seipp, Cassandra Smith, Miriam Smith, & Mary Wolfe-Shifflett}

^{ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RELATING TO AUDITED CLAIMS OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED CLAIMANTS}

^{The Court has received Applications for Issuance of Orders to show Cause ("Applications"), filed by the AHP Settlement Trust ("Trust"), relating to the audited claims of the above-referenced Claimants. Accordingly, pursuant to the Rules for the Audit of Matrix Compensation Claims ("Audit Rules"), approved in Pretrial Order No. 2807, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimants must show cause why the trust’s requests for relief should not be granted.}

^{It is further ORDERED that these matters are referred to the Special Master for further proceedings. The Court directs that, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, the Trust shall serve upon the Special Master documentation to support its Applications, including: 1. Detailed statements of the case, as described in Rule 23 of the audit rules; 2. Attestation forms completed by auditing cardiologists for the se claims; 3. Auditing cardiologists’ worksheets; 4. Any and all other materials submitted to and/or completed by auditing cardiologists’ and 5. The audit files.}

^{Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Audit Rules, Claimants may submit responses to the Special Master within 21 days after service of the Trust’s supporting documentation. If any claimant fails to file a response, or if any claimant requests the special master to proceed without a response, the special master shall proceed in accordance with the audit rules.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²⁴⁵

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimants: Debra Boesker, Diane Boulanger, Loretta B. Castillo, Maria H. Chmura, Judy E. Clark, Ellie P. Cole, Carol A. Glidewell, Wanda Hanson, Bonnie C. Harrison, Geraldine James, Shirley McBride, Sandralee McCormick, Estate of Brenda J. Moreno, Elliot J. Palay, Estate of Johanna M. Tasoulis, Lorraine R. Waage, Steven M. Whisler, & Dorothy N. Wright}

^{ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RELATING TO AUDITED CLAIMS OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED CLAIMANTS}

^{The Court has received Applications for Issuance of Orders to show Cause ("Applications"), filed by the AHP Settlement Trust ("Trust"), relating to the audited claims of the above-referenced Claimants. Accordingly, pursuant to the Rules for the Audit of Matrix Compensation Claims ("Audit Rules"), approved in Pretrial Order No. 2807, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimants must show cause why the trust’s requests for relief should not be granted.}

^{It is further ORDERED that these matters are referred to the Special Master for further proceedings. The Court directs that, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, the Trust shall serve upon the Special Master documentation to support its Applications, including: 1. Detailed statements of the case, as described in Rule 23 of the audit rules; 2. Attestation forms completed by auditing cardiologists for the se claims; 3. Auditing cardiologists’ worksheets; 4. Any and all other materials submitted to and/or completed by auditing cardiologists’ and 5. The audit files.}

^{Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Audit Rules, Claimants may submit responses to the Special Master within 21 days after service of the Trust’s supporting documentation. If any claimant fails to file a response, or if any claimant requests the special master to proceed without a response, the special master shall proceed in accordance with the audit rules.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²⁴⁶

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimants: Maxine C. Alexander, Estate of Michelle T. Brown, Claudia K. Dwyer, Kerensa C. Evans, Susan Gauntt, Estate of Daniel Lancaster, Billie A. Littleton, Vaughncille Molden, Ilah R. Stone & Barbara H. Williams}

^{ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RELATING TO AUDITED CLAIMS OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED CLAIMANTS}

^{The Court has received Applications for Issuance of Orders to show Cause ("Applications"), filed by the AHP Settlement Trust ("Trust"), relating to the audited claims of the above-referenced Claimants. Accordingly, pursuant to the Rules for the Audit of Matrix Compensation Claims ("Audit Rules"), approved in Pretrial Order No. 2807, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimants must show cause why the trust’s requests for relief should not be granted.}

^{It is further ORDERED that these matters are referred to the Special Master for further proceedings. The Court directs that, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, the Trust shall serve upon the Special Master documentation to support its Applications, including: 1. Detailed statements of the case, as described in Rule 23 of the audit rules; 2. Attestation forms completed by auditing cardiologists for the se claims; 3. Auditing cardiologists’ worksheets; 4. Any and all other materials submitted to and/or completed by auditing cardiologists’ and 5. The audit files.}

^{Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Audit Rules, Claimants may submit responses to the Special Master within 21 days after service of the Trust’s supporting documentation. If any claimant fails to file a response, or if any claimant requests the special master to proceed without a response, the special master shall proceed in accordance with the audit rules.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²⁴⁷

^{Re: Judith Scott v. Wyeth (05-202440}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of plaintiff to remand is DENIED; AND}

^{2. All claims against defendant Joe H. Kelly are DISMISSED.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²⁴⁸

^{Re: Harmon (02-20082), Stalling (02-20118), Chandler (02-20120), Binion (02-20119), Mosley (02-20112) & Robbins (02-20081) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motions for leave of court to designate experts in six above-captioned actions are DENIED as moot.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²⁴⁹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimant: Lula Beach}

^{For good cause shown, Claimant, Lula Beach, Executor of the Estate of James L. Beach, Deceased’s and AHP Settlement Trust’s Joint Motion to Supplement the Record is GRANTED. The Lula Beach record on appeal is hereby supplemented with the AHP Settlement Trust’s Response to the Special Master’s Decision Regarding Clamant Lula Beach’s Petition to Submit New Evidence.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²⁵⁰

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of Lula Beach, executor of the estate of James L. Beach, to stay appeal (Doc. No. 520) is DENIED.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²⁵¹

^{Re: Walton (03-20589), Graves (03-20585), Holcomb (03-20762), Dickey (03-20631), Bolton (03-20586) & Lizana (03-20627) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motions to stay proceedings in the six above-captioned actions are DENIED as moot. The Special Discovery Master has granted a stay of discovery in these matters until January 2006.}

^5-20-2005

⁵²⁵²

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Whenever this court enters and order dismissing all claims against a defendants in an action that is part of MDL 1203, that defendant shall be terminated and all pending motions related to that defendant shall be deemed DENIED as moot; and}

^{2. The deputy clerk is hereby authorized to make said pending motions terminated without further order of the court.}

^5-23-2005

⁵²⁵³

^{Re: Gwen Gibson (03-20313) (Wayne Bohanon, Shaye Boyd, Minnie Hayes, Roslind M. Houston, Sherita King, Alene Leveston, Frances O. Walker, & Mary Woodard) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiffs Wayne Bohanon, Minnie Hayes, Roslind M. Houston, Sherita King, Alene Leveton, Frances O. Walker, and Mary Woodard hereby dismiss without prejudice this action as to all defendants in the above-captioned matter, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiffs Wayne, Bohanon, Shaye Boyd, Minnie Hayes, Roslind M. Houston, Sherita King, Alene Leveston, Frances O. Walker, and Mary Woodard and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-23-2005

⁵²⁵⁴

^{Re: Judith Powell v. Wyeth (04-21879)}

^{THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the stipulated joint motion of plaintiff Judith Powell and the Defendants to dismiss the claims of Plaintiff Judith Powell without prejudice against Defendants.}

^{AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), THAT THE complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matters. Those being Wyeth and AHP Subsidiary Holding Corporation.}

^5-23-2005

⁵²⁵⁵

^{Re: Louticia Filla v. Wyeth (04-26606)}

^{AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Louticia Filla hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth and Dean C. Solcher, M.D., with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Louticia Filla may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Louticia Filla and defendants Wyeth and Dean C. Solcher, M.D., who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-23-2005

⁵²⁵⁶

^{Re: Isabella Kalbakian (04-30002) & Sheryl Smith (04-29652) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2005. it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motions of plaintiffs to remand the above-captioned actions to the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California are DENIED; and}

^{2. All defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth are DISMISSED.}

^5-23-2005

⁵²⁵⁷

^{Re: Brenda Cook v. Wyeth (04-29863)}

^{AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of plaintiffs to remand is DENIED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants except Wyeth are DISMISSED.}

^5-23-2005

⁵²⁵⁸

^{Re: Mark Gill (03-20553) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all Defendants, with each party to bear their own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{In the event that plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and Plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

5-23-2005

5258

Re: Mark Gill (03-20553) v. Wyeth

AND NOW, this 23^{rd day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all Defendants, with each party to bear their own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{In the event that plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and Plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^5-24-2005

⁵²⁵⁹

^{Re: Katherine Perkins v. Wyeth (05-20017)}

^{AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of plaintiffs to remand to the District Court of Jefferson County, Kentucky is DENIED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants except Wyeth, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc. are DISMISSED.}

^5-24-2005

⁵²⁶⁰

^{Re: Sheila Brown (99-20593), Kay Alred (04-25063), Bernard Benzel (04-21183), Shirley Bones (04-26191), Estate of Billy Ray Booth (04-21808), Betty Jo Bridenstine (03-20526), Dorothy Coler (04-21470), Kathy Gastmann (04-26178), Janice Haning (04-22797), Linda C. Holloway (04-26839), Micki D. Hornsby (04-22919), Judith Ryan (04-23948) & Caroline Westcott (04-25064) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the following motions are DENIED:}

^{1. "Unopposed motion to revoke intermediate opt-out" of Carolyn Westcott in Westcott v. Wyeth;}

^{2. "Unopposed motion to revoke intermediate opt-out and request return to class settlement" of Beverly Nelson in Bridenstine v. AHP;}

^{3 "Unopposed motion to revoke intermediate opt-out" of Geraldine Cole in Alred v. Wyeth;}

^{4.:Unopposed motion to revoke intermediate opt-out" of David Kernan in Haning v. Wyeth ;}

^{5. "Unopposed motion to revoke intermediate opt-out" of Greg Francil in Coler v. Weyth;}

^{6. "Unopposed motion to revoke intermediate opt-out" of James C. Anderson in Coler v. Wyeth;}

^{7. "Unopposed motion to revoke intermediate opt-out" of Esther Nelson in Coler v. Wyeth ;}

^{8. "Unopposed motion to revoke intermediate opt-out" os Sheila Sedam in Gastmann v. Wyeth;}

^{9. "Unopposed motion to revoke intermediate opt-out" of Deborah Lemen in Gastmann v. Wyeth;}

^{10. "Unopposed motion to revoke intermediate opt-out" of Teresa L. Erb in Bones v. Wyeth;}

^{11. "Unopposed motion to revoke intermediate opt-out" of Judith Ryan in Ryan v. Wyeth;}

^{12. "Unopposed motion to revoke intermediate opt-out and back-end opt-out" of Bernard Benzel in Benzel v. Wyeth;}

^{13. Motion of Micki Hornsby "to revoke intermediate opt-out and for leave to register for claim benefits" in Brown v. AHO;}

^{14. Motion of Linda Holloway "to revoke intermediate opt-out and for leave to register claim for benefits" in Brown v. AHP;}

^{15. Motion of Marjorie Schloss "to seek leave to register for benefits with the Trust after the May 3, 2003 deadline" in Brown v. AHP;}

^{16. Motion of Betty J. Ware "to seek leave to register for benefits with the Trust after the May 3, 2003 deadline" in Booth v. Wyeth; and}

^{17. Motion of Cecil and Virginia Wright "to seek to leave to register for the benefits with the trust after the May 3, 2003 deadline" in Brown v. AHP.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁶¹

^{Re: Cheryl Yvonne Barnett v. Wyeth (03-20460)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss with prejudice is GRANTED. Sanctions in the form os costs and attorney’s fees in the amount to be determined will be imposed jointly and severally on Cheryl Yvonne Barnett and Richard N. Laminack, Esquire.;}

^{2. Wyeth shall submit within 15 days an affidavit or affidavits containing in detail its costs and attorney fees. It shall identify the attorneys, the hourly rates, the number of hours worked, and a description of the specific work done;}

^{3. Plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel may submit response within 15 days after service of Wyeth’s affidavit (s);}

^{4. The motion of Wyeth "to compel plaintiff’s deposition as related to fraudulent claim that she was injured by ingesting Redux in 1989" is DENIED as moot; and}

^{5. The unopposed motion of Wyeth for summary judgment is DENIED as moot.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁶²

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, upon consideration of Class Counsel’s Motion on Behalf of Fund Administrator for Court Approval of Third Authorization Application, the attached Third Authorization Application is Approved by the Court. It is further ordered that PNC Bank, N.A., the "Escrow Agent" for the Seventh Amendment to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement with AHP, shall release funds held in escrow pursuant to the terms of the Seventh Amendment for the payment of expenses, fees and costs itemized in the attached Third Authorization Application that this Order approves.}

^{Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Escrow Agent shall release funds for the following items:}

^{1. Payment of invoice of Fund Administrator for services, expenses and fees for the period February 16 to March 16, 2005 pursuant to its third invoice in the amount of $1,265,692.48;}

^{2. Payment of invoices of the members of the MRCC as follows:}

^{A. Gregg J. Reis, M.D. $13,250.00}

^{B. Dean G. Karalis, M.D. $22,000.00}

^{C. Frank Silvestry, M.D. $14,500.00}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁶³

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition and amended petition of objector Joel Zuckerberg’s for award of attorneys’ fees and expenses to objectors’ counsel are DENIED without prejudice.}

^5-26-2005

⁵²⁶⁴

^{Re: All Actions FILED UNDER SEAL}

^{AND NOW, May, 26, 2005, upon consideration of PMC’s Motion for Release and Use of Funds form the MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account, established by Gregory Miller, Esquire, Escrow Agent, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that said Motion is GRANTED and Gregory Miller, Esquire, is directed to make payment on invoices totaling Seventy Nine Thousand Four Hundred Seventy-One Dollars and Fourteen Cents to the PMC Fen-Phen Litigation Account, by wire transfer.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁶⁵

^{Re: Ron Weaver v. Wyeth (05-20155)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Lawrence A. Baker, D.O. only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Ron Weaver and Defendant Lawrence A. Baker, D.O. who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁶⁶

^{Re: Linda Shill v. Wyeth (04-25838)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Richard B. Whitehead, M.D. only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Linda Shill and Defendant Richard B. Whitehead, M.D. who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁶⁷

^{Re: Frank Rodriguez v. Weyth (04-27056)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Anthony G. Rodas, M.D. only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Frank Rodriguez and Defendant Anthony G. Rodas, M.D. who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁶⁸

^{Re: William Partrite v. Wyeth (04-28565)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Arthur M. Inoshita, M.D., Theodore W. Hole, M.D., and Ronald H. Chochinov, M.S.only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff William Partrite and Defendants Arthuir M. Inoshita, M.D., Theodore W. Hole, M.D. and Ronald H. Chochinov, M.D. who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁶⁹

^{Re: Judy Kear v. Wyeth (04-27089)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Richard Wolf, M.D. only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Judy Kear and Defendant Richard Wolf, M.d. who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁷⁰

^{Re: Ed Hooper v. Wyeth (05-20318)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Ajitpal S. Tiwana, M.D. only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Ed Hooper and Defendant Ajitpal S. Tiwana, M.D. who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁷¹

^{Re: Shirley Dipaola v. Wyeth (04-27359)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant David W. Schwartz, M.D. only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Shirley Dipaola and Defendant David W. Schwartz, M.D. who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁷²

^{Re: Jeanne Conklin v. Wyeth (05-20139)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant David J. Carty, M.D. only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Jeanne Conllin and Defendant David J. Carty, M.D., who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁷³

^{Re: John Bixler v. Wyeth (05-20162)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Said L. Elzayat, M.D. only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff John Bixler and Defendant Said L. Elzayat. who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁷⁴

^{Re: Marion F. Baxter v. Wyeth (04-27339)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Marie S.A. Umali, M.D. only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Marion F. Baxter and Defendant Marie S.A. Umali, M.D. who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁷⁵

^{RE: Marel J. Sigsway v. Wyeth (04-22661)}

^{Plaintiff marel J. Sigsway advises the court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Marel J. Sigsway and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Marel J. Sigsway’s claims as to defendant Wyeth.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁷⁶

^{Re: Joan McCormick v. AHP (02-20219)}

^{IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Joan McCormick, and Defendant John D. Olson, M.D., through their respective counsel, that the petition for damages filed by plaintiff against defendant in the above-captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice as to this defendant only and without costs to either party. This stipulation may be signed in counterparts and, if so signed, shall have the same force and effect as if all signatories had executed one copy.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁷⁷

^{Re: Rosalind Peychaud v. Wyeth (02-20223)}

^{IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Rosalind Peychaud, and Defendant Jack Andonie, M.D., through their respective counsel, that the petition for damages filed by plaintiff against defendant in the above-captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice as to this defendant only and without costs to either party. This stipulation may be signed in counterparts and, if so signed, shall have the same force and effect as if all signatories had executed one copy.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁷⁸

^{Re: Mary Ann Grant v. Wyeth (04-28548)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), that the claims of plaintiff Beverly Buxton in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendant, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This Stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁷⁹

^{Re: Kelvin Crowder v. Wyeth (04-28572)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to defendant Wyeth, with each party to bear their own costs and counsel fees.}

^{IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff ever reinstates a lawsuit(s) against any of the defendants herin based on any alleged damages caused by fenfluramine, dexfenfluramine or phentermine, such action(s) shall be filed in federal court.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁸⁰

^{Re: Penny Balogh v. Weyth (05-20252)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to defendant Wyeth, with each party to bear their own costs and counsel fees.}

^{IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff ever reinstates a lawsuit(s) against any of the defendants herin based on any alleged damages caused by fenfluramine, dexfenfluramine or phentermine, such action(s) shall be filed in federal court.}

^5-25-2005

⁵²⁸¹

^{Re: Elvia Aguirre (Janice E. Reeves) v/ Wyeth (04-27317)}

^{AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Janice E. Reeves hereby dismiss with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear their own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement and as agreed to in the Request to Revoke Opt-Out Form executed by the Plaintiff on April 10, 2004, and agreed to by Wyeth on May 5, 2004.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Janice E. Reeves and defendant Wyeth, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-26-2005

⁵²⁸²

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of class members represented by the law offices of Charles F. Abbott, PC, also known as Abbott & Walker, PC, to disqualify}

^{Dr. Joseph Kisslo and Dr. Neil Weissman from participating in the training of auditing cardiologists is DENIED.}

^5-26-2005

⁵²⁸³

^{Re: Hubert Roberts v. Wyeth (04-21247)}

^{AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2004, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $150.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-26-2005

⁵²⁸⁴

^{Re: Bonnie Becker v. Wyeth (04-21907)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-26-2005

⁵²⁸⁵

^{Re: Brenda Brice V. AHP (02-20144)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remittedto the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-26-2005

⁵²⁸⁶

^{Re: Renia Davis v. Wyeth (04-20371)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-26-2005

⁵²⁸⁷

^{Re: Doris V. Waldron v. Wyeth (04-26196)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-26-2005

⁵²⁸⁸

^{Re: Eldifonsa Soliz v. Wyeth (04-27321)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-26-2005

⁵²⁸⁹

^{Re: Velma L. Patrick v. Wyeth (05-20565)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-26-2005

⁵²⁹⁰

^{Re: Tammy Holt v. Wyeth (05-20576)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-26-2005

⁵²⁹¹

^{Re: Mary S. Clayton v. Wyeth (04-27093)}

^{AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-27-2005

⁵²⁹²

^{Re: Andrea Odom v. Wyeth (04-26764)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-27-2005

⁵²⁹³

^{Re: Clinton F. Fregia v. Wyeth (04-21388)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-27-2005

⁵²⁹⁴

^{Re: Jessica Beloney v. Wyeth (04-26698)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-27-2005

⁵²⁹⁵

^{Re: Caroll Baldridge v. Wyeth (04-26727)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-27-2005

⁵²⁹⁶

^{Re: Lynn L. Crane v. Wyeth (04-26818)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-27-2005

⁵²⁹⁷

^{Re: Judy Anderson v. Wyeth (04-27240)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-27-2005

⁵²⁹⁸

^{Re: Barbara J. Barker v. Wyeth (04-27320)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-27-2005

⁵²⁹⁹

^{Re: Tami J. Abernathy v. Wyeth (04-27092)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-27-2005

⁵³⁰⁰

^{Re: Connie R. Best v. Wyeth (04-26819)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-27-2005

⁵³⁰¹

^{Re: Glenda K. Coffman v. Wyeth (04-27097)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action shall be severed into separate civil actions;}

^{2. Each plaintiff and his or her derivative claimants shall submit for filing a Severed and Amended Complaint no later than 60 days of the date of this order and in accordance with paragraphs 7, 8, 10, and 12 of PTO No. 3370;}

^{3. The clerk of court shall assign a separate civil action number, which shall be related to civil action no. 04-21247, for each severed and amended complaint filed pursuant to this order;}

^{4. A filing fee in the amount of $250.00 shall be remitted to the clerk of court foe each severed and amended complaint, except for the first named plaintiff who files a severed and amended complaint; and}

^{5. Failure to remit the filing fee with a severed and amended complaint, except as noted in paragraph 4, will result in the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by the plaintiff.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³⁰²

^{Re: Connie Appleton v. Wyeth (04-28537)}

^{COME NOW the plaintiff, Connie Appleton, and the defendant, Wyeth and stipulate to the dismissal of the claims of Connie Appleton in the above-styled and numbered cause without prejudice. In the event that plaintiff, Connie Appleton, shall name no new defendants, nor assert new claims, and plaintiff, Connie Appleton, may refile this case only in Federal Court.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³⁰³

^{Re: Donna C. Turner v. Wyeth (03-20433)}

^{AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such Agreement.}

^{In the event that plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, Plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and Plaintiff shall name no new defendants}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff Donna C. Turner and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, those being Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³⁰⁴

^{Re: Evangelette Hobbs v. Wyeth (04-27203)}

^{AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Evangelette Hobbs hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants Wyeth, A.H. Robins, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharm., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs and American Cyanamid Company, Robert H. Falke, Linda Jean Lorch and Michelle Herren, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Evangelette Hobbs may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Evangelette Hobbs and defendants Wyeth, Robert H. Falke, Linda Jean Lorch and Michelle Herren-Pavelec, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³⁰⁵

^{Re: Kelly Wilson v. Wyeth (191}

^{AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Kelly Wilson hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants Wyeth, A.H. Robins, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharm., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs and American Cyanamid Company, Robert H. Falke, Linda Jean Lorch and Michelle Herren, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Kelly Wilson may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Kelly Wilson and defendants Wyeth, Robert H. Falke, Linda Jean Lorch and Michelle Herren-Pavelec, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³⁰⁶

^{Re: Charles Chatman v. Wyeth (04-27197)}

^{AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Charles Chatman hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants Wyeth, A.H. Robins, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharm., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs and American Cyanamid Company, Robert H. Falke, Linda Jean Lorch and Michelle Herren, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Charles Chatman may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Charles Chatman and defendants Wyeth, Robert H. Falke, Linda Jean Lorch and Michelle Herren-Pavelec, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³⁰⁷

^{Re: Rose Edwards v. Wyeth (04-27206)}

^{AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Rose Edwards hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants Wyeth, A.H. Robins, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharm., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs and American Cyanamid Company, Robert H. Falke, Linda Jean Lorch and Michelle Herren, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Rose Edwards may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Rose Edwards and defendants Wyeth, Robert H. Falke, Linda Jean Lorch and Michelle Herren-Pavelec, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³⁰⁸

^{Re: Quencelia Graves v. Wyeth (04-27193)}

^{AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Quencelia Graves hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants Wyeth, A.H. Robins, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharm., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs and American Cyanamid Company, Robert H. Falke, Linda Jean Lorch and Michelle Herren, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Quencelia Graves may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Quencelia Graves and defendants Wyeth, Robert H. Falke, Linda Jean Lorch and Michelle Herren-Pavelec, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³⁰⁹

^{Re: Geneve Green v. Wyeth (04-27187)}

^{AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Geneva Green hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants Wyeth, A.H. Robins, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharm., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs and American Cyanamid Company, Robert H. Falke, Linda Jean Lorch and Michelle Herren, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal is without prejudice to any rights plaintiff Geneva Green may later accrue under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Geneva Green and defendants Wyeth, Robert H. Falke, Linda Jean Lorch and Michelle Herren-Pavelec, who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³¹⁰

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of "objectors/appellants for reconsideration of Pretrial Order 5184" (Doc. No. 1985) is DENIED.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³¹¹

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 31st day of May, 2005, upon consideration of the Thirty-Seventh Application by Special Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses relating to PTO No. 2383, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that Wyeth reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $2,006.05 for the period from 04-01-05 through 04-30-05 in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³¹²

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 31st day of May, 2005, upon consideration of the Fifty-Third Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (04-01-05 through 04-30-05), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $115,564.53 the period from 04-01-05 through 04-30-05, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³¹³

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 31st day of May, 2005, upon consideration of the Eighty-Fifth Application by Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (04/01/05 through 04/30/05), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements in the amount of $127,507.34 for the period from 04/30/05 through 04/30/05, in accordance with the procedure established by the court.}

^5-31-2005

⁵³¹⁴

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 31st day of May, 2005, upon consideration of the Fifty-Ninth Application by Escrow Agent for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (04/01/05 through 04/30/05), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Escrow Agent for disbursements and compensation in the amount of $27,143.56 for the period from 04/01/05 through 04/30/05), in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.}

^6-1-2005

⁵³¹⁵

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{WHEREAS, Pretrial Order 3882 directs that Class Counsel and Wyeth determine if High Level Claims within the scope of the Parallel Processing Procedures are sufficiently complete within the meaning of the Settlement Agreement to permit making a determination of eligibility for Matrix Compensation benefits as High Level Claim;}

^{WHEREAS, Pretrial Order No. 3882 directs that Wyeth review each completed High Level Claim and designate if the claim is Payable, and if Payable, the benefit level and amount of the claim;}

^{WHEREAS, Pretrial Order 3882 directs the Trust to aggregate all claims designated as Payable by Wyeth during the preceding month and to file with the Court a motion for an Order authorizing the Trust to pay the claims in accordance with the amount determined by Wyeth; and}

^{WHEREAS, Wyeth designated the claims set forth on Schedule 1 hereto as Payable at the benefit levels and amounts set forth therein.}

^{NOW, THEREFORE, this 1st day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Motion of the AHP Settlement Trust to Pay Claims Designated As Payable By Wyeth Pursuant To Pretrial Order No. 3882 (the "Motion"), the two supplements to the Motion, and any response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED that the Motion, as supplemented, is GRANTED. The Trust shall pay those claims designated as Payable by Wyeth on Schedule 1 attached hereto, at the benefit levels and in the amounts determined by Wyeth as set forth therein in accordance with Pretrial Order 3882. Payment under this Order is subject to the resolution of any outstanding subrogation claims pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement.}

^6-1-2005

⁵³¹⁶

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR WYETH TO RESPOND TO CLAIMANT’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DETERMINING THAT HER PRIVATELY-OBTAINED ECHOCARDIOGRAM OF 03/20/03 WAS TIMELY PERFORMED UNDER THE NATIONWIDE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT}

^{It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED by and between Linda S. Clark, represented by Hutton & Hutton Law Firm. L.L.P., and Defendant Wyeth, through their respective undersigned counsel, that Wyeth shall have an extension of time up to and including June 9, 2005 to respond to Ms. Clark’s Motion for an Order Determining That Her Privately-Obtained Echocardiogram of 03/20/05 was Timely Performed Under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement.}

^{This extension is for a period of less than thirty (30) days. No prior extension has been requested or given in this matter.}

^6-1-2005

⁵³¹⁷

^{Re: Linda S. Kirouac v. Wyeth (04-25232)}

^{AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the above action is GRANTED.}

^6-1-2005

⁵³¹⁸

^{Re: Elizabeth Arnold (03-20555), Cindy Burton (99-20607), Adele R. Girodano (03-20412), Scott Spielberg (03-20303) & Carrie Wilson (03-20063) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the unopposed motion and detailed representations of counsel in the above-captioned matters in support of allowing them to withdraw as counsel for plaintiffs in the above-captioned action, it is hereby ORDERED that withdraw is permitted, subject to the following conditions:}

^{1. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall send a letter to plaintiffs by certified mail that will include the following:}

^{A. A copy of this order;}

^{B. A statement outlining to plaintiffs the importance of their proceeding on this case with counsel}

^{familiar with the law and th procedures in Federal court of cases similar to this case;}

^{C. Plaintiffs’ counsels’ letter shall also provide that plaintiffs shall have 30 days from the date of this}

^{order to secure new counsel if plaintiffs intend to proceed with counsel in this matter;}

^{D. Plaintiffs’ counsel’s letter shall also state that the court intends to grant plaintiffs’ present counsels’}

^{motion to withdraw at the expiration of the 30-day period, and the case shall proceed on its normal trial}

^{schedule whether or not plaintiffs have secured new counsel; and}

^{E. Plaintiffs’ counsel may include any other matter that plaintiffs’ counsel believes is pertinent in the}

^{letters to plaintiffs;}

^{2. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall file with the Clerk of Court within 10 days of the date of this order a certificate that both evidences that plaintiffs’ counsel has complied with all of the foregoing requirements of this order and states the plaintiffs’ last known addresses; and}

^{3. Thirty (30) days from the date of this order, provide all the foregoing steps have been completed by plaintiffs’ counsel, plaintiffs’ counsel shall be deemed to be released from further responsibility from the court as counsel for plaintiffs in this civil action.}

^6-3-2005

⁵³¹⁹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. Whenever this court enters an order dismissing all claims brought by a plaintiff in an action that is part of multi-district litigation (MDL) 1203, that plaintiff shall be terminated and all pending motions related to that plaintiff shall be deemed DENIED as moot; and}

^{2. The deputy clerk is hereby authorized to make said pending motions terminated without further order of the court.}

^6-3-2005

⁵³²⁰

^{Re: Kelly Travis, brendan Travis and Bo Travis v. Wyeth (04-23149)}

^{AND NOW TO WIT: this 3rd day of June, 2005, it having been reported that plaintiff, Kelly Travis, individually and on behalf of her minor children, Brendan Travis and Bo Travis, wishes to dismiss this matter with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, it is hereby}

^{ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Kelly Travis, individually and on behalf of her minor children, Brendan Travis and Bo Travis, in the above-captioned action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.}

^6-6-2005

⁵³²¹

^{Re: Lori Sobkowski v. Wyeth (04-27154)}

^{AND NOW TO WIT: This 6th day of June, 2005 it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby}

^{ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to all named Defendants.}

^6-6-2005

⁵³²²

^{Re: John Mudri v. Wyeth (05-20243)}

^{AND NOW TO WIT: This 6th day of June, 2005 it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon order of the court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby}

^{ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.}

^6-8-2005

⁵³²³

^{Re: Cynthia Acosta (02-20143), Rosalie Bergeron (02-20136), Karen Billingsly (04-25058), Lana Bond (04-21919), Gale Bouchillon (04-20739), Beth Branch (04-25106), Tarus Burrell (04-21364), Annie Callihan (04-21754), Pamela Chapman (04-25095), Rosalyn Daigle (03-20130), Patti Ford (04-24045), Joann Forister (02-20204), Karen Frank (04-26163), Gail Mary Frazier (98-20684), Martha Green (03-20234), Eddie Nicholson (02-20211), Eristis Poindexter (04-25091), Paula Pomansky (02-20252), Jerry Sublet (04-24043), Sharron Turner (04-25087), Estate of Lois Wren (04-21678) & Fay Minnie Wreyford (04-20799) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions of counsel for plaintiffs in the above-captioned actions to withdraw as counsel are DENIED without prejudice. See Hargrove v. City of Philadelphia.}

^6-10-2005

⁵³²⁴

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of Class Counsel’s Motion on behalf of Fund Administrator for Court Approval of Fourth Authorization Application, the attached Fourth Authorization Application is Approved by the Court. It is further Ordered that PNC Bank, N.A., the "Escrow Agent" for the Seventh Amendment to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement with AHP, shall release funds held in escrow pursuant to the terms of the Seventh Amendment for the payment of expenses, fees and costs itemized in the attached Fourth Authorization Application that this Order approves.}

^{Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Escrow Agent shall release funds for the following items:}

^{1. Payment of invoice of Fund Administrator for services, expenses and fees for the period March 17 to April 15, 2005 pursuant to its fourth invoice, in the amount of $432,801.78;}

^{2. Payment of invoices of the members of the MRCC as follows:}

^{A. Gregg J. Reiss, M.D., March ‘05 $11,000.00}

^{B. Dean G. Karalis, M.D. March ‘05 $11,500.00}

^{C. Frank Silvestry, M.D. March ‘05 $30,000.00}

6-13-2005

5325

Re: Karen Martin v. Wyeth (04-23251)

AND NOW, this 13^{th day of June, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that th emotion of Wyeth to enforce the Settlement Agreement and PTO No. 1415 against class member Karen Martin is DENIED without prejudice to Wyeth’s refiling the motion after relevant discovery is complete.}

^6-13-2005

⁵³²⁶

^{Re: Estella Pena v. Wyeth (05-20690)}

^{AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of plaintiffs to remand to the District Court of Bexar County, Texas is DENIED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned action except Wyeth, Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, and Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., Wyeth-Ayers Laboratories, and Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. are DISMISSED.}

^6-13-2005

⁵³²⁷

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of a motion by Class Counsel, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that the below designated law firms, the New Jersey Diet Drug Plaintiffs’ Steering}

^{Committee, the New York Diet Drugs Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and the Pennsylvania Diet Drug Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, be reimbursed forthwith for the costs they expended prior to June 30, 2001 to be paid forthwith from the Fund A Legal Fees Escrow account which has accrued net interest in excess of $6.6 million.}

^6-10-2005

⁵³²⁸

^{Re: Florence Anderson (05-20584), Janis Bayer (05-20597), Laleesa Comer-West (05-20599), Pam Deblanc (05-20585), Julie Freeman (05-20582), Mary Goodman (05-20587), Jo Hughes (05-20601), Joyce Kitts (05-20600), Cathy Pavlisin-Everett (05-20586), & Royce Smith (05-20583) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motions of plaintiffs to remand in the above-captioned matters are DENIED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants in the above-captioned actions except Wyeth, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Wyeth Ayerst International, Inc., and Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. are DISMISSED.}

^6-1-2005

⁵³²⁹

^{Re: All Actions - UNDER SEAL}

^{AND NOW, June 13, 2005, upon consideration of the PMC’s Motion for Release and Use of Funds from the MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account, established by Gregory Miller, Esquire, Escrow Agent, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that said motion is GRANTED and Gregory Miller, Esquire, is directed to make payment on invoices totaling Forty Four Thousand Three Hundred Fifty-Nine Dollars and Thirty-Two Cents to the PMC Fen-Phen Litigation account by wire transfer.}

^6-13-2005

⁵³³⁰

^{Re: Krystyna Bobak (05-20581), Don E. Dorso (05-20559), Donna Eichenseer (05-20556), Colleen Harvey (05-20554), Sherry A. James (05-20563), Anita M. Leo (05-20560), Alison L. Lewis (05-20580), Joyce M. Licata (05-20553), Sarah C. Moore (05-20558), Mary I. Morris (05-20579), Marica A. Sciolino (05-20557), Sandra J. Sterner (05-20555), Geraldine B. Swaney (05-20552), Charlotte M. Syroczynski (05-20578), Corliss M. Thomas (05-20562), & Edward L. Valentine, III (05-20561) v. AHP}

^{AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motions of plaintiffs to remand the following cases to the Supreme court of the State of New York, Erie County are GRANTED: Bobak, Lewis, & Morris;}

^{2. The Clerk of Court shall REMAND the following actions to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Erie County: Bobak, Lewis, & Morris;}

^{3. The motions of plaintiff to remand the remaining 13 actions are DENIED; and}

^{4. All claims against defendant Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc. are DISMISSED in the following actions: dorso, Eichenseer, Harvey, James, Leo, Lincata, Moore, Sciolino, Sterner, Swaney, Thomas, & Valentine.}

^6-15-2005

⁵³³¹

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, this 15th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Escrow Agent’s request for the release of funds to pay the Second Quarter Sate Tax Estimate for the year 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that said request is GRANTED and Gregory P. Miller, Esquire, as Escrow Agent for the MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account, is directed to pay state taxes in the amount of Six Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($6,300).}

6-15-2005

5332

Re: Glynda A. Brown (04-28544) & James Collard (04-28470) v. Wyeth

AND NOW, this 15^{th day of June, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motions of plaintiffs to remand in the two above-captioned actions are DENIED; and}

^{2. The claims against all defendants except Wyeth are dismissed.}

^6-15-2005

⁵³³³

^{Re: Noemie Dubroc v. AhP (02-20193)}

^{AND NOW, it having been reported that the plaintiff, Noemie Dubroc, in the listed action has settled her claims with AHP, and does not intend to prosecute her action against any named defendants which have not been released pursuant to that Settlement Agreement, upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court;}

^{IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and the agreement of counsel, all claims in the above numbered and entitled action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named defendants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any rights to which the plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Settlement Agreement.}

^6-15-2005

⁵³³⁴

^{Re: Mary Bernard v. AHP (04-20399)}

^{AND NOW, it having been reported that the plaintiff, Mary Bernard, in the listed action has settled her claims with AHP, and does not intend to prosecute her action against any named defendants which have not been released pursuant to that Settlement Agreement, upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court;}

^{IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and the agreement of counsel, all claims in the above numbered and entitled action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named defendants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any rights to which the plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Settlement Agreement.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³³⁵

^{Re: Darla Allen v. Wyeth (04-23148)}

^{AND NOW TO WIT: this 17th day of June, 2005 it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby}

^{ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³³⁶

^{Re: Marilyn Melder v. AHP (02-20142)}

^{IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Marilyn Melder, ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Sheldon Hersh, M.D., ("Defendant"), through their respective counsel, that the Petition for Damages filed by plaintiff against defendant in the above-captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice as to this Defendant, Sheldon Hersh, M.D. only and without costs to either party. This stipulation may be signed in counterparts and, if so signed, shall have the same force and effect as if all signatories had executed one copy.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³³⁷

^{Re: Abenicio I. Rael v. Wyeth (04-28492)}

^{IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between counsel for the parties as follows:}

^{That the individual named defendant Richard O. Kamrath, M.D. is hereby dismissed from the action with prejudice.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³³⁸

^{Re: Audrey J. Bergen v. Wyeth (04-23244)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims in the above-captioned case are to be dismissed with prejudice and on the merits, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff and Defendant Wyeth, the only named defendant in this action.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³³⁹

^{Re: Karen Moseley v. Wyeth (03-20093)}

^{This Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss, FIND that it should be GRANTED.}

^{It is, therefore ORDERED that the above captioned action is dismissed without prejudice.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁴⁰

^{Re: Alysmay Antonucci v. Wyeth (04-22922)}

^{Shellie Johnson, plaintiff in the above-referenced case, advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to all Defendants in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Shellie Johnson and Defendant stipulate to dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff’s claims.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the National Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁴¹

^{Re: Julie Otero v. Wyeth (04-22785)}

^{Plaintiff Julie Otero advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Julie Otero and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Julie Otero’s claims as to defendant Wyeth.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁴²

^{Re: Connie Cummins v. AHP (04-28461)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁴³

^{Re: Michael Montgomery v. Wyeth (03-20550)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the claims of plaintiff Earnestine Morgan in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This stipulation complies with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties in this action who have entered an appearance have executed this dismissal through the undersigned counsel of record.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁴⁴

^{Re: Rainey Safranek v. Wyeth (04-27361)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Jerome T. Taurek, M.D. only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Rainey Safranek and Defendant Jerome T. Taurek, M.D. who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁴⁵

^{Re: Edward Sanchez v. Wyeth (05-20184)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Oliver Burrows, M.D. only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Edward Sanchez and Defendant Oliver Burrows, M.D. who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁴⁶

^{Re: Gail Lococo v. Wyeth (05-20319)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Janet R. Schwartz, M.D. only, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Gail Lococo and Defendant Janet R. Schwartz, M.D. who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁴⁷

^{Re: Jane Joiner v. Wyeth (03-20598)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of plaintiff Jane Joiner in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement agreement, and this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to such agreement.}

^{In the event that plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Joiner and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁴⁸

^{Re: Karen L. Brooks v. Weyth (03-20365)}

^{Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and this Stipulation, the parties agree that the Complaint filed on behalf of Karen L. Brooks shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and fees.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁴⁹

^{Re: Patricia Y. Hulce v. Wyeth (03-20149)}

^{Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and this Stipulation, the parties agree that the Complaint filed on behalf of Patricia Y. Hulce shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and fees.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁵⁰

^{Re: Scott Spielberg v. Wyeth (03-20203)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of plaintiff and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, those being Wyeth, a Delaware Corporation, formerly AHP, Eon Labs Mfg., Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Goldlline Laboratories, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Ivax Corporation, a Florida Corporation.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁵¹

^{Re: Devora Silverman v. Wyeth (05-20177)}

^{AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that Defendant Dennis W. Evangelatos, M.D., is hereby dismissed with prejudice.}

^{Nothing in this Order shall effect the claims of plaintiff against any other Defendant in this matter.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of the plaintiff and defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned mater.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁵²

^{Re: Charles B. Shepard v. Wyeth (04-24167)}

^{Plaintiff Charles B. Shepard advises the court that he wishes to dismiss his claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Charles B. Shepard and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff Charles B. Shepard’s claims as to defendant Wyeth.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁵³

^{Re: Sherrie D. Austin v. Wyeth (04-24095)}

^{Plaintiff Sherrie D. Austin advises the court that he wishes to dismiss his claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Sherrie D. Austin and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff Sherrie D. Austin’s claims as to defendant Wyeth.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁵⁴

^{Re: Toni S. Brown v. Wyeth (04-24048)}

^{Plaintiff Toni S. Brown advises the court that he wishes to dismiss his claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Toni S. Brown and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff Toni S. Brown’s claims as to defendant Wyeth.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁵⁵

^{Re: Fern E. Tronnier v. Wyeth (04-23013)}

^{Plaintiff Fern E. Tronnier advises the court that he wishes to dismiss his claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Fern E. Tronnier and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff Fern E. Tronnier’s claims as to defendant Wyeth.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled to the Nationwide Class Action settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁵⁶

^{Re: Lois Hendrickson v. Wyeth (03-20075)}

^{Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules if Civil Procedure, and this Stipulation, the parties agree that hte Complaint filed on behalf of Lois Hendrickson shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁵⁷

^{Re: All Actions}

^{It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED between Plaintiffs and Wyeth, through their respective counsel, that Plaintiffs shall file their response to Wyeth’s third omnibus motion to compel on or before June 21, 2005.}

^{This extension is for a period of less than 30 days. No prior extension has been requested or given in this matter.}

^6-17-2005

⁵³⁵⁸

^{Re: All Actions FILED UNDER SEAL}

^{AND NOW, June 17, 2005, upon consideration of PMC’s Motion for Release and Use of Funds form the MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account, established by Gregory Miller, Esquire, Escrow Agent, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that said Motion is GRANTED and Gregory Miller, Esquire, is directed to make payment on invoices totaling Eight Five Thousand Four Hundred Seventy-Five Dollars and Forth Three Cents to the PMC Fen-Phen Litigation Account, by wire transfer.}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁵⁹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that, on or before July 6, 2005, all interested parties including class counsel and Wyeth, shall file with the court their response to the motion of the AHP Settlement Trust "for interpretation of the Settlement Agreement regarding Matrix Claims that are denied because the echocardiograms of attestation contain inserted frames."}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁶⁰

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{And now, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Stipulation between claimant Deborah Beckstead and the AHP Settlement Trust attached hereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved, the Order to Show Cause Regarding claimant Deborah Beckstead is discontinued, and PTO No. 3217, as it pertains to Claimant Deborah Beckstead is vacated.}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁶¹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{And now, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Stipulation between claimant Dawn A. Bower and the AHP Settlement Trust attached hereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved, the Order to Show Cause Regarding claimant Dawn A. Bower is discontinued, and PTO No. 3217, as it pertains to Claimant Dawn A. Bower is vacated.}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁶²

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{And now, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Stipulation between claimant Marsha Echols and the AHP Settlement Trust attached hereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved, the Order to Show Cause Regarding claimant Marsha Echols is discontinued, and PTO No. 3217, as it pertains to Claimant Marsha Echols is vacated.}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁶³

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{And now, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Stipulation between claimant Debra Ericksen and the AHP Settlement Trust attached hereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved, the Order to Show Cause Regarding claimant Debra Ericksen is discontinued, and PTO No. 3217, as it pertains to Claimant Debra Ericksen is vacated.}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁶⁴

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{And now, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Stipulation between claimant NaDeane Hansen and the AHP Settlement Trust attached hereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved, the Order to Show Cause Regarding claimant NaDeane Hansen is discontinued, and PTO No. 3217, as it pertains to Claimant NaDeane Hansen is vacated.}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁶⁵

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{And now, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Stipulation between claimant Kerri Henrie and the AHP Settlement Trust attached hereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved, the Order to Show Cause Regarding claimant Kerri Henrie is discontinued, and PTO No. 3217, as it pertains to Claimant Kerri Henrie is vacated.}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁶⁶

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{And now, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Stipulation between claimant Nancy Lowe and the AHP Settlement Trust attached hereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved, the Order to Show Cause Regarding claimant Nancy Lowe is discontinued, and PTO No. 3217, as it pertains to Claimant Nancy Lowe is vacated.}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁶⁷

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{And now, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Stipulation between claimant Steve Melton and the AHP Settlement Trust attached hereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved, the Order to Show Cause Regarding claimant Steve Melton is discontinued, and PTO No. 3217, as it pertains to Claimant Steve Melton is vacated.}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁶⁸

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{And now, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Stipulation between claimant Linda Neeley and the AHP Settlement Trust attached hereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved, the Order to Show Cause Regarding claimant Linda Neeley is discontinued, and PTO No. 3217, as it pertains to Claimant Linda Neeley is vacated.}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁶⁹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{And now, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Stipulation between claimant Carolyn Porter and the AHP Settlement Trust attached hereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved, the Order to Show Cause Regarding claimant Carolyn Porter is discontinued, and PTO No. 3217, as it pertains to Claimant Carolyn Porter is vacated.}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁷⁰

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{And now, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Stipulation between claimant Bunny Sabey and the AHP Settlement Trust attached hereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved, the Order to Show Cause Regarding claimant Bunny Sabey is discontinued, and PTO No. 3217, as it pertains to Claimant Bunny Sabey is vacated.}

^6-20-2005

⁵³⁷¹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{And now, this 20th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Stipulation between claimant Anne Zdunich and the AHP Settlement Trust attached hereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved, the Order to Show Cause Regarding claimant Anne Zdunich is discontinued, and PTO No. 3217, as it pertains to Claimant Anne Zdunich is vacated.}

^6-22-2005

⁵³⁷²

^{Re: All Actions}

^{The Court has before it the Stipulation for extension of time to respond to Wyeth’s Third Omnibus Motion to Compel. The Court having considered same is of the opinion that said extension should be GRANTED. It is, therefore,}

^{ORDERED that the Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Wyeth’s Third Omnibus Motion to Compel is hereby adopted by the Court. Plaintiffs shall file their response to this motion on or before June 21, 2005.}

^6-22-2005

⁵³⁷³

^{Re: Eldifonsa Soliz v. Wyeth (04-27321)}

^{AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of plaintiffs to stay all proceedings in this case is DENIED.}

^6-22-2005

⁵³⁷⁴

^{Re: Phyllis Cortez v. AHP (99-20636)}

^{AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2005, it is hereby ordered that the unopposed motion of Wyeth to dismiss the above-captioned action pursuant to Rules 41(b) and 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is GRANTED.}

^6-23-2005

⁵³⁷⁵

^{Re: Marie Arnold (04-27592), Tammy Conway (04-25033), Patricia Johnson (04-28143), Wanda J. Ochoa (04-23075), Lesley T. Sipp (04-24450), Lula Tate (04-22993), & Becky A. Wilson (04-22308) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ordered that:}

^{1. The motion of Wyeth to enforce the Settlement Agreement and PTO No. 1415 against the class members in the above-captioned actions is GRANTED; and}

^{2. All claims of plaintiffs in the above-captioned actions are DISMISSED.}

^6-23-2005

⁵³⁷⁶

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Application for Confirmation of Trustees’ Interim Account and Discharge of Trustees, Trust Executive Director and trust Officers filed by the AHP Settlement trust ("Trust") and the Trustees and former Trustees thereof, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The trust shall disseminate the attached notice of filing of application for confirmation of Trustees’ Interim Account and Discharge of Trustees, Trust Executive Director and Trust Officers ("Application") to all persons having registered a claim against the assets of the trust, by first-class United States Mail, postage pre-paid, with all costs of notice to be borne by the Trust;}

^{2. All persons who received mailed notice and all other persons who assert an interest in the Trust must file any response they may have to the application, in writing, on or before July 11, 2005, which date shall be set forth in the notice;}

^{3. Any reply by the trust shall be filed on or before July 22, 2005;}

^{4. A hearing shall be held on July 27,2005 at 2:00 pm. In Courtroom 16A, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, at which the court will consider the Application and any responses thereto. This date shall be set forth in the notice; and}

^{5. All persons wishing to attend and present testimony or evidence at the hearing shall file a list of proposed witnesses and proposed exhibits at least seven days prior to the date of the hearing.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁷⁷

^{Re: Audrey Logos v. Wyeth (04-27238)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2005, that the motion of defendants Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, AHP Subsidiary Holding Corporation, and Vicki Kilcline for leave to file a reply to plaintiff’s opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁷⁸

^{Re: Estate of Robert S. Rodencal, by and through Michael E. Rodencal, as personal representative v. Wyeth (04-23356)}

^{Plaintiff Estate of Robert S. Rodencal, by and through Michael E. Rodencal, as Personal Representative, advises the Court that he wishes to dismiss his father’s claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Robert S. Rodencal and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Robert S. Rodencal.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁷⁹

^{Re: Sandy Mixon v. Wyeth (04-21603)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of plaintiff Sandy Mixon in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^{In the event that Plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, Plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and Plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁸⁰

^{Re: Sandra A. Strabe. v. Wyeth (04-23042)Plaintiff Sandra A. Strabel, advises the Court that he wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Sandra A. Strabe and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Sandra A. Strabe.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁸¹

^{Re: Lynda L. Borel v. Wyeth (04-21873)}

^{THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the stipulated joint motion of plaintiff Lynda L. Borel and the Defendants to dismiss the claims of plaintiff Lynda L. Borel without prejudice as against Defendants.}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), THAT THE Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁸²

^{Re: Ethel Johnson v. Wyeth (04-25915)}

^{Plaintiff Ethel Johnson, advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Ethel Johnson and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Ethel Johnson’s claims as to Defendant Wyeth.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁸³

^{Re: Mary A. Jensen v. (04-25969)}

^{Plaintiff Mary Jensen, advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Mary A. Jensen and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Mary A. Jensen.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁸⁴

^{Re: Barbara L. Hodge v. Wyeth (04-25851)}

^{Plaintiff Barbara Hodge, advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Barbara L. Hodge and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Barbara L. Hodge.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-27-2005

⁵³⁸⁵

^{Re: William L. Chapman v. Wyeth (04-25923)}

^{Plaintiff William Chapman, advises the Court that he wishes to dismiss his claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff William L. Chapman and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff William L. Chapman.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^5-27-2005

⁵³⁸⁶

^{Re: Paula M. Mason v. Wyeth (04-26014)}

^{Plaintiff Paula Masonl, advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Paula M. Mason and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Paula M. Mson.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁸⁷

^{Re: Barbara A. Simmons v. Wyeth (04-25864)}

^{Plaintiff Barbara Simmonsl, advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Barbara Simmons and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Barbara Simmons.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁸⁸

^{Re: Peggy R. Resneck v. Wyeth (04-25988)}

^{Plaintiff Peggy Resneckl, advises the Court that she wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Peggy Resneck and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Peggy Resneck.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁸⁹

^{Re: Janice A. McCrory v. Wyeth (04-25904)}

^{Plaintiff Janice McCrory, advises the Court that he wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Janice A. McCroryand Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Janice A. McCrory.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁹⁰

^{Re: Marlen Grimes v. Wyeth (05-20321)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that Defendant David Heber, M.D. is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.}

^{Nothing in this Order shall effect the claims of Plaintiff against any other Defendant in this matte.r}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of the Plaintiff and Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁹¹

^{Re: Luella Kramer v. Wyeth (05-20131)}

^{IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their attorneys of record, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), that defendant Michael Laskar, M.D. may be dismissed, with prejudice, form the above-entitled mater.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁹²

^{Re: Carmen R. Johnson v. Wyeth (04-20908)}

^{AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of plaintiff Carmen R. Johnson in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^{In the event that Plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, Plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only, and Plaintiff shall name no new defendants.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁹³

^{Re: Kathy L. Phillips v. Wyeth (04-25999)}

^{Plaintiff Kathy Phillips, advises the Court that he wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Kathy Phillips and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Kathy Phillips.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-27-2005

⁵³⁹⁴

^{Re: Evelyn Cowart v. Wyeth (04-25963)}

^{Plaintiff Evelyn Cowart, advises the Court that he wishes to dismiss her claims and causes of action as to Defendant Wyeth in this case, with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Evelyn Cowart and Defendant Wyeth stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff Evelyn Cowart.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with Wyeth.}

^6-28-2005

⁵³⁹⁵

^{Re: Kimberly Banks (04-20726), Kelly Baumgartner (04-21156), Deborah Beckmann (04-20719), Mike Bergstrom (04-21163), Teresa Brethouwer (04-21161), Sharon Carlson (04-21174), Elizabeth Chevalier (04-20733), Donelle Fritz (04-20725), Marjorie Hansen (04-20723), Angie Hernandez (04-21158), James Johnson (04-21175), Lori Littell (04-21162), & Vivien Peterson (04-21166) v. Wyeth}

^{AND OW, this 28th day of June, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the following motions are GRANTED:}

^{1. Unopposed motion for an enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of Kimberly Banks;}

^{2. Unopposed motion for enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of Kelly Baumgartner;}

^{3. Unopposed motion for enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of Deborah Beckman;}

^{4. Unopposed motion for enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of Mike Bergstrom;}

^{5. Unopposed motion for enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of Teresa Brethouwer;}

^{6. Unopposed motion for enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of Teresa Brethouwer;}

^{7. Unopposed motion for enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of Elizabeth Chevalier;}

^{8. Unopposed motion for enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of Donelle Fritz;}

^{9. Unopposed motion for enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of Marjorie Hansen;}

^{10. Unopposed motion for enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of Angie Hernandez;}

^{11. Unopposed motion for enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of James Johnson;}

^{12. Unopposed motion for enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of Lori Littell;}

^{13. Unopposed motion for enlargement of time for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion to dismiss to June 27, 2005, of Vivien Peterson.}

^6-28-2005

⁵³⁹⁶

^{Re: Benita Price v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc. (01-20101)}

^{Upon the agreement of all parties the and the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised;}

^{IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND ORDERED that the above cases are dismissed.}

^6-29-2005

⁵³⁹⁷

^{Re: Kimberly Banks (04-20726), Kelly Baumgartner (04-21156), Deborah Beckmann (04-20719), Teresa Brethouwer (04-21161), Sharon Carlson (04-21174), Elizabeth Chevalier (04-20733), Angie Hernandez (04-21158), & Lori Littell (04-21162) v. Wyeth}

^{The Court, being hereby advised of the Plaintiffs’ voluntary motion to dismiss, does hereby dismiss each of the above-listed actions, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs.}

^7-1-2005

⁵³⁹⁸

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{APPROVING THE NINTH AMENDMENT TO THE NATIONWIDE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELATED COURT-APPROVED PROCEDURES}

^{Court Approved Procedure No. 8 is attached.7-1-2005}

^7-1-2005

⁵³⁹⁹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593)}

^{AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2005, having heard and considered the views of the relevant parties expressed at the status conference held on June 29, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The matters listed on Exhibit A hereto are STAYED until August 30, 2005;}

^{2. In the event the parties have not resolved their differences regarding the motions listed Exhibit A or said motions are not withdrawn prior to the expiration of this sty, the following briefing schedule shall apply:}

^{A. With respect to the "motion of certain class members in support of their motion under Rule 60(b) for relief from judgment" (Doc. #1471), Wyeth and all other interested parties shall file and serve responses on or before September 30, 2005, and Movants and all other interested parties shall file and serve replies on or before October 21, 2005;}

^{B. With respect to "Wyeth’s motion to deny claims for Settlement Benefits submitted by Napoli/Hariton" (Doc. #1646), Napoli, Kaiser, Bern & Associates and Hariton & D’Angelo (Napoli/Hariton) shall file and serve their response on or before September 30, 2005, and Wyeth shall file and serve its reply on or before October 21, 2005; and}

^{C. The stay entered in Stipulation and PTO No. 4485 will remain in effect until such time as the Court rules upon Wyeth’s motion to deny claims for Settlement Benefits submitted by Napoli/Hariton or the motion is withdrawn.}

^7-1-2005

⁵⁴⁰⁰

^{Re: All Actions}

^{PROCEDURE FOR AWARD OF COUNSEL FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF LITIGATION OF EXPENSES}

^7-1-2005

⁵⁴⁰¹

^{Re: Clinton F. Fregia v. Wyeth (04-21388)}

^{AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the Severance Order in Clinton F. Fregia, et al v. Wyeth, et al, CIV.A. No. 04-21388 (E.D. Pa.) Os VACATED. See PTO No. 5293.}

^7-1-2005

⁵⁴⁰²

^{Re: All Actions}

^{PROCEDURE FOR STATE COURT JUDICIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO RECOMMEND AWARD OF COUNSEL FEES TO STATE COURT ATTORNEYS}

^{In order to comply with the terms of the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with AHP as amended, which require the Court to consult with and give substantial deference to the views of the State Court Judicial Advisory Committee concerning the actual contribution which was made to the overall resolution of the litigation by the attorneys with whom the members of the committee are familiar, it is on this 1st day of July, 2005, hereby}

^{ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:}

^{1. Within ten days of the entry of this Order, lead Class Counsel shall cause a copy of this Order to be served on the judges in their respective states who were previously appointed pursuant to PTO 1014 to the State Court Judicial Advisory Committee.}

^{2. The State Court Judicial Advisory Committee is requested to meet as soon as practicable with lead counsel appointed in the class actions certified in the states of Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas and West Virginia for the purpose of formulation a plan, procedure and timetable for providing this Court with the Committee’s views as to the actual contribution that was made to the overall resolution of the litigation by the attorneys with whom the members of the committee are familiar.}

^{3. On or before August 31, 2005, lead counsel for the certified state class actions shall provide a status report to the Court concerning the Committee’s plan and timetable for providing its views.}

^{4. Prior to making any further award of counsel fees, the Court shall consult with and give substantial deference to the views of the State Court Judicial Advisory Committee.}

^{5. All costs and expenses incurred by the members of the Committee shall be promptly reimbursed as administrative expenses of the Settlement Trust.}

^7-6-2005

⁵⁴⁰³

^{Re: Rae K. Nelson v. Wyeth (04-25721)}

^{It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED between Plaintiff Rae K. Nelson and Wyeth, through their respective counsel, that Plaintiff shall file her response to Wyeth’s Motion to Enforce the Settlement agreement and PTO No. 1415 and to Dismiss Against Class Member Rae K. Nelson on or before July 6, 2005.}

^{This extension is for a period of less than 30 days. No prior extension has been requested or given in this matter.}

^7-6-2005

⁵⁴⁰⁴

^{Re: Carol J. Garcia v. Wyeth (04-25639)}

^{It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED between Plaintiff Carol J. Garcia and Wyeth, through their respective counsel, that Plaintiff shall file her response to Wyeth’s Motion to Enforce the Settlement agreement and PTO No. 1415 and to Dismiss Against Class Member Carol J. Garcia on or before July 6, 2005.}

^{This extension is for a period of less than 30 days. No prior extension has been requested or given in this matter.}

^7-6-2005

⁵⁴⁰⁵

^{Re: Dee Shaw v. Wyeth (04-25815)}

^{It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED between Plaintiff Dee Shaw and Wyeth, through their respective counsel, that Plaintiff shall file her response to Wyeth’s Motion to Enforce the Settlement agreement and PTO No. 1415 and to Dismiss Against Class Member Dee Shaw on or before July 6, 2005.}

^{This extension is for a period of less than 30 days. No prior extension has been requested or given in this matter.}

^7-6-2005

⁵⁴⁰⁶

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-205930}

^{It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED by and between The Law Offices of Joseph H. Malley, P.C. and Defendant Wyeth, through their respective undersigned counsel, that Wyeth shall have an extension of time up to and including July 19, 2005 to respond to the above-titled motion filed by The Law Offices of Joseph H. Malley, P.C.}

^{This extension is for a period of less than thirty (30) days. No prior extension has been requested or given in this matter.}

^7-6-2005

⁵⁴⁰⁷

^{Re: Frank T. Riselvato v. Wyeth (04-25791)}

^{It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED between Plaintiff Frank T. Riselvato and Wyeth, through their respective counsel, that Plaintiff shall file his response to Wyeth’s Motion to Enforce the Settlement Agreement and PTO No. 1415 and to Dismiss Against Class Member Frank T. Riselvato on or before July 6, 2005.}

^{This extension is for a period of less than thirty (30) days. Nor prior extension has been requested or given in this matter.}

^6-7-2005

⁵⁴⁰⁸

^{Re: Gayla Alspach v. Wyeth (05-20482)}

^{AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2005, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The motion of plaintiffs to remand is DENIED; and}

^{2. All claims against defendants except Wyeth, Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Wyeth -Ayerst Laboratories are DISMISSED.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴⁰⁹

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 11th day of July, 2005, upon consideration of the Thirty-Eighth Application by Special Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses relating to PTO No. 2383 (05/01/05 through 05/31/05), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that Wyeth reimburse the Special master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $16,513.20 for the period from 05/01/05 through 05/31/05, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴¹⁰

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 11th day of July, 2005, upon consideration of the Fifty-Fourth Application by Special master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (05/01/05 through 05/31/05), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $147,484.19 for the period from 05/01/05 through 05/31/05, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴¹¹

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 11th day of July, 2005, upon consideration of the Eighty-Sixth Application by Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (05/01/05 through 05/31/05), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursement and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $120,166.20 for the period from 05/001/05 through 05/31/05, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴¹²

^{Re: All Actions}

^{AND NOW, TO WIT, this 11th day of July, 2005, upon consideration of the Sixtieth Application by Escrow Agent for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (05/01/05 through 05/31/05), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Escrow Agent for disbursement and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $9,867.88 for the period from (05/01/05 through 05/31/05), in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴¹³

^{Re: Jessica Beloney (04-26698), Connie Best (04-26819), Lynn Crane (04-26818) & Andrea Odom (04-26764) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of plaintiffs in the above actions for relief from order of dismissal in PTO No. 5083 is DENIED.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴¹⁴

^{Re: James Johnson (04-211750 v. Wyeth}

^{The Court, being hereby advised of the Plaintiff’s voluntary Motion to Dismiss, does hereby dismiss the above-named action, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴¹⁵

^{Re: Donelle Fritz v. Wyeth (04-20725)}

^{The Court, being hereby advised of the Plaintiff’s voluntary Motion to Dismiss, does hereby dismiss the above-named action, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴¹⁶

^{Re: Marjorie Hansen v. Wyeth (04-20723)}

^{The Court, being hereby advised of the Plaintiff’s voluntary Motion to Dismiss, does hereby dismiss the above-named action, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴¹⁷

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimants: Betty L. Branch, Anthony G. Condray, Daniel Garman, Carolyn L. Gray, Renee N. Lawrence & Helen T. Stallings}

^{The Court has received Applications for Issuance of Orders to Show Cause ("Applications"), filed by the AHP Settlement Trust ("Trust"), relating to the audited claims of the above-referenced Claimants. Accordingly, pursuant to the Rules for the Audit of Matrix Compensation Claims ("Audit Rules"), approved in PTO No. 2807, it is hereby ORDERED that these Claimants must show cause why the Trust’s requests for relief should not be granted.}

^{It is further ORDERED that these matters are referred to the Special Master for further proceedings. The court directs that, within 14 days of the date of this Order, the Trust shall serve upon the Special Master documentation to support its Applications, including: 1. Detailed Statements of the Case, as described in Rule 23 of the Audit Rules; 2. Attestation Forms completed by Auditing Cardiologists for these claims; 3. Auditing Cardiologists; Worksheets; 4. Any and all other materials submitted to and/or completed by Auditing Cardiologists’ and 5. The Audit Files.}

^{Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Audit Rules, Claimants may submit Responses to the Special Master within 21 days after service of the Trust’s supporting documentation. If any Claimant fails to file a response, or if any Claimant requests the Special Master to proceed without a Response, the Special Master shall proceed in accordance with the Audit Rules.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴¹⁸

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimants: Brenda J. Crawford, Claudia Doyle, Erenstine Richardson & The Estate of Gilbert Walters}

^{The Court has received Applications for Issuance of Orders to Show Cause ("Applications"), filed by the AHP Settlement Trust ("Trust"), relating to the audited claims of the above-referenced Claimants. Accordingly, pursuant to the Rules for the Audit of Matrix Compensation Claims ("Audit Rules"), approved in PTO No. 2807, it is hereby ORDERED that these Claimants must show cause why the Trust’s requests for relief should not be granted.}

^{It is further ORDERED that these matters are referred to the Special Master for further proceedings. The court directs that, within 14 days of the date of this Order, the Trust shall serve upon the Special Master documentation to support its Applications, including: 1. Detailed Statements of the Case, as described in Rule 23 of the Audit Rules; 2. Attestation Forms completed by Auditing Cardiologists for these claims; 3. Auditing Cardiologists; Worksheets; 4. Any and all other materials submitted to and/or completed by Auditing Cardiologists’ and 5. The Audit Files.}

^{Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Audit Rules, Claimants may submit Responses to the Special Master within 21 days after service of the Trust’s supporting documentation. If any Claimant fails to file a response, or if any Claimant requests the Special Master to proceed without a Response, the Special Master shall proceed in accordance with the Audit Rules.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴¹⁹

^{Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593) claimant: Nancy J. Mathieu}

^{ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPEAL FROM REPORT AND AWARD OF ARBITRATOR}

^{On December 9, 2004, Claimant Nancy J. Mathieu ("Claimant") filed a notice of appeal from the report and award of the arbitrator who presided over her appeal from the AHP Settlement Trust’s final determination in her claim for Matrix Compensation Benefits. AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that:}

^{1. The chair of the arbitrator panel ("chair") shall number the pages of the arbitration record consecutively and, within 10 days of the date of this Order, shall provide to the Court, the Claimant and counsel for the AHP Settlement Trust a complete copy of the arbitration record.}

^{2. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, Claimant shall file and serve an appellate brief, which shall include a statement of the issues presented for review, a summary of Claimant’s argument and a conclusion stating the precise relief sought. Claimant’s brief shall not exceed 20 pages in length.}

^{3. Within 20 days of service of Claimant’s brief, the AHP Settlement Trust shall file and serve a responsive brief. The AHP Settlement Trust’s responsive brief shall not exceed 20 pages in length}

^{4. Within 11 days of service of the AHP Settlement Trust’s responsive brief, Claimant may file and serve a reply brief. Claimant’s reply brief shall not exceed 10 pages in lenght.}

^{5. All references to the arbitration record in the parties’ briefs shall be to the pages of the record as marked by the Chair. The Court will not consider evidence that is not part of the arbitration record.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴²⁰

^{Re: Gewn Gibson (Gloria Gomez, Kathy Lewis, Nash Revilla), et al. v. Wyeth (03-20313)}

^{AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiffs Gloria Gomez, Kathy Lewis and Nash Revilla hereby dismiss with prejudice this action as to all defendants in the above-captioned matter, Wyeth, with each party to bear their own costs and counsel fees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement and as agreed in the Request to Revoke Opt-Out form executed by Plaintiffs, and agreed to by Wyeth on August 3, 2004 for Gloria Gomez, on June 8, 2004 for Kathy Lewis, and on August 3, 2004 for Nash Revilla.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴²¹

^{Re: Sherry Ackerson (Linda Free) (04-20272) v. Wyeth}

^{AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the claims of Plaintiff Linda Free in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants Wyeth and Bruce R. Stewart, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.}

^{Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement and as agreed to in the Request to revoke Opt-Out form exectued by the Plaintiff and agreed to by Wyeth on March 5, 2004. This Stipulation does not constitue a factual finding as to the merits of Plaintiff’s case nor as to her qualifications, if any, to receive benefits from the Settlement Trust.}

^{This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff Linda Free and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, those being Wyeth and Bruce R. Stewart.}

^6-11-2005

⁵⁴²²

^{Re: Dianne E. Ansohn (Tammy G. Comeaux), et al. v. Wyeth (03-20812)}

^{AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2005, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that plaintiff Tammy G. Comeaux hereby dismisses with prejudice this action as to all defendants, Wyeth, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees. This dismissal shall be with prejudice. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this dismissal shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement and as agreed to in the Request to Revoke Opt-Out Form executed by the Plaintiff and postmarked on November 23, 2004, and agreed to by Wyeth on January 4, 2005.}