The Official MDL - 1203 Web Site
Complex Tech
 
Home
Generic Docket
Pretrial Orders
PTOs 0001-0499
PTOs 0500-0999
PTOs 1000-1499
PTOs 1500-1999
PTOs 2000-2499
PTOs 2500-2999
PTOs 3000-3499
PTOs 3500-3999
PTOs 4000-4499
PTOs 4500-4999
PTOs 5000-5499
PTOs 5500-5999
PTOs 6000-6499
Special Master Info.
Fact Sheet
Filing Info.
PACER/Docket

 

FENPHEN MDL-1203

Offical Website for the United States Courts' Multidistrict Litigation,
Action No. 1203, In Re: Diet Drugs



PTOs 2000-2499


6/01/01

2000

Re: Jeffree Davidson, et al V.  AHP, et al (99-20595); Jessica Gowan, et al V.  AHP, et al (99-20330); Yvonne Leachet, et al V.  AHP, et al (99-20308)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 1st day of June, 2001, upon consideration of the motion of Van O=Steen, Esquire to withdraw as counsel for all Plaintiffs named in the foregoing Civil Actions, IT IS ORDERED that withdrawal of counsel is permitted, subject to the following conditions:...

6/01/01

2001

Re: Anne R.  Murray V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (99-20755)

      AND NOW THIS 1st day of June, 2001, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41 (a) (1) (ii), that the claims in the complaint in the above-captioned matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice and on the merits as to all named defendants with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.

        This Stipulation is filed on behalf of all defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter against whom the claims in the complaint shall be dismissed in their entirety by the Court=s approval of this Stipulation.APPROVED AND SO ORDERED

6/01/01

2002

Re: Anita Johnson V.  AHP Corp., and Wyeth-Ayerst Labs.  Co.  (99-20442)

      AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2001, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED pursuant to and in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a) (1) (ii) that the claims of Plaintiff Anita Johnson in the Complaint in the above-captioned matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice in their entirety.  Each party is to bear its own costs.

        This Stipulation is filed on behalf of the above-named Plaintiff and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter (to wit, American Home Products Corporation and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company), against whom the claims in the Complaint shall be dismissed in their entirety by the Court=s approval of this Stipulation.APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

6/01/01

2003

Re: Dora Glazier V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (99-20224)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 1st day of June, 2001, upon consideration of the motion of A.  Hoyt Rowell, III, Esquire on behalf of Ness, Motley, Loadhold, Richardson, and Poole (Docket # 202497) to withdraw as counsel for Dora Glazier, IT IS ORDERED that withdrawal of counsel is permitted, subject to the following conditions:...

5/30/01

2004

Re: Helen K.  and Angelo J.  Lazardes V.  AHP Corp.  (00-20178)      Pursuant to Rule 41 (a) (1) (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all parties by their respective counsel hereby stipulate that this action, including all claims asserted therein, be dismissed with prejudice, without costs to any party and with all rights of appeal waived.

2/01/01

2005

Re: Brenda Bryant V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., AHP Corp.  (01-1008)

REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND PRETRIAL ORDER NO.  1255

              This is a dismissal with prejudice of an ENTIRE civil action in MDL 1203

   Plaintiff: 1.  Brenda Bryant

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pretrial Order No.  1255 Brenda Bryant voluntarily dismisses with prejudice Civil Action No.  01-20069 as to all named Defendants, which are as follows:

                  1.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories;

                  2.  American Home Products Corp.

        This case can be marked closedBY THE COURT

6/01/01

2006

Re: All cases listed on Exhibit A

     AND NOW TO WIT: This 1st day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

      ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order.

6/01/01

2007

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 1st day of June, 2001, upon consideration of the Thirty Sixth Application by Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (3/01/01 through 3/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $51,580.37 for the period from 3/1/01 through 3/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT

6/01/01

2008

Re: Ella Rhone V.  American Home Products, et al (98-20071)

      AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that the Decision and Recommendation No.  85 of Special Discovery Master (as to Case Specific Expert Discovery in Rhone V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.)  is AFFIRMED.BY THE COURT

6/01/01

2009

Re: ALL ACTIONS   

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 1st day of June, 2001, upon consideration of the Fourth Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (3/01/01 through 3/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount $47,855.94 for the period from 3/1/01 through 3/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT 

6/01/01

2010

Re: Sheila Brown, et al V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593); and Elliot Palay V.  American Home Products Corporation (Claim # 20172)

       AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2001, upon consideration of American Home Products Corporation=s Motion for an Enlargement of Time to Respond to Claimant Elliot Palay=s Motion to Exercise and Initial Opt-out and to Rescind the Accelerated Implementation Option Agreement, and any response thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion of American Home Products Corporation be and is hereby GRANTED and that American Home Products shall file its response to Claimant Elliot Palay=s Motion on or before June 14, 2001.BY THE COURT.

6/04/01

2011

Re: Cindy Burton V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, et al (99-20607)

      ON this day, came on to be heard, Plaintiff=s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants= Motion to Strike Plaintiff=s First Amended Complaint and the Court, having considered the argument and evidence of counsel, does hereby grant said motion and orders that the time for the Plaintiff=s response to Defendants= Motion to Strike Plaintiff=s First Amended Complaint be extended until June 8, 2001.       SIGNED on this 4th day of June, 2001.

6/05/01

2012

Re: Alfredo (Fred) Junsay and Martha Junsay (Court File No.  00-1374)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 5th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of this Court, it is

       ORDERED, that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel and without costs.       It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case can be marked closed

6/05/01

2013

Re: All cases listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 5th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order.

6/05/01

2014

Re: ALL ACTIONS FILED UNDER SEAL

6/05/01

2015

Re: All cases listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 6th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement with counsel without costs.

        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order.

6/05/01

2016

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 5th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of the Fourteenth Application by Escrow Agent for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (4/01/01 through 4/30/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $7,232.00 for the period from 4/1/01 through 4/30/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT.

6/12/01

2017

Re: Dianne Hankton V.  AHP, and/or Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., and/or Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (00-20582)

       CONSIDERING THE FOREGOING:        IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above captioned matter is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs

6/12/01

2018

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of the Thirty Seventh Application by Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (4/01/01 through 4/30/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $32,481.41 for the period from 4/1/01 through 4/30/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT

6/12/01

2019

Re: Curtis L.  Toliver, et al V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., et al (00-20836)

      AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, it is ORDERED that the motion to withdraw filed by Emily Sides Bonds is GRANTED.  E.  Ann McMahan and Marc C. Dawsey have entered their appearance on behalf of the plaintiff.BY THE COURT

6/12/01

2020

Re: Janell Kuhnert V.  A.H. Robins Co., Inc., AHP, Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., Div.  of AHP (00-20780)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 12th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

        ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to the agreement of counsel without costs.         It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case can be marked closed

6/12/01

2021

Re: Kelly K.  Brennen V.  AHP and  A.H. Robins Co.  (00-21017)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 12th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to the agreement of counsel without costs.        It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case can be marked closed

6/12/01

2022

Re: Linda DeMars V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; and A.H. Robins Company, Inc.  (00-20916)

       Based upon the foregoing Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice in regard to the above-entitled actions against Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; and A.H. Robins Company, Inc.,

       IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice as to all named Defendants and without costs to any party concerning the claims of Linda DeMars       LET JUDGEMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

6/14/01

2023

Re: ALL ACTIONS

PROCEDURE FOR AWARD OF COUNSEL FEES & REIMBURSEMENTS OF LITIGATION EXPENSES

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 14th day of June, 2001, in order to provide for the orderly and efficient presentation and determination of requests for the award of attorneys= fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses from: (1) the MDL 1203 Fees and Costs Account established and maintained pursuant to Pretrial Orders Nos. 467 and 517 and (2) from the funds available for an award of counsel fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses pursuant to Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with American Home Products Corporation (the ASettlement@), which was approved by this court in Pretrial Order No.  1415 (collectively the ADiet Drug Common Benefit Fee Sources@), IT IS ORDERED that:

6/14/01

2024

Re: ALL ACTIONS

6/14/01

2025

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 14th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of the uncontested joint motion for approval of the Subrogation Settlement Agreement between Class Counsel, American Home Products Corporation, and HMO Louisiana, Inc., et al., IT IS ORDERED that said motion is GRANTED.

6/14/01

2026

Re: Sheila Brown, Sharon Gaddie, Vivian Naugle, Quintin Layer, and Joby Jackson-Reid Individually and all others similarly situated V.  AHP Corp.  (99-20593)       AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of the attached form of First Amendment to Lease by and between W9/LWS Real Estate Limited Partnership, as Landlord, and the AHP Settlement Trust (Athe Trust@), as Tenant, (Athe Lease Amendment@); and the Court having been advised as follows: that the Lease Amendment relates to the procurement of additional space in the building where the Trust currently has office space pursuant to a Lease Agreement that was approved by this Court in Pretrial Order No.  1422 dated September 1, 2000; that the terms of the attached form of Lease Amendment were negotiated at arms= length and approved upon consideration by the Board of Trustees of the Trust; that the attached form of Lease Amendment has

6/14/01

2027

Re: Sheila Brown, et al V.  AHP Corp.  (99-20593)

      Considering the Motion and Incorporated Memorandum for Extension of Time Within Which to Report Common Benefit Hours and Expenses,       IT IS ORDERED that Walter Dumas and Daniel E.  Becnel, Jr.  are hereby allowed until June 21st, to report their final common benefit hours and expenses to Class Counsel.

6/15/01

2028

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 15th day of June, 2001, it appears to the court that American Home Products Corporation has raised objections to the validity of certain notices to opt-out of the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement in Brown v. American Home Products Corp., Civ.  No.  99-20593, resulting in uncertainty as to the status of numerous cases pending in this MDL No.  1203 and in other courts throughout the country.        Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the court will commence a hearing concerning the criteria that the court will consider in determining the validity of initial opt-out forms and/or opt-out letters submitted before the March 30, 2000 initial opt-out deadline established by Pretrial Order No.  997, and that were subsequently provided an opportunity to Acure@ deficiencies in those submissions identified by the Interim Claims Administrators (AICAs@) pursuant to the terms of deficiency letters issued by the ICAs.  Said hearing shall commence on Thursday...

6/19/01

2029

Re: Mary Moon V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, et al.  (98-20536)

      MEMORANDUM AND PRETRIAL ORDER NO.2029...

6/19/01

2030

Re: Broussard, et al.  V.  Gate Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.  (99-20153); Glaze V.  Gate Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.  (98-20728); Chaney, et al.  V.  A.H. Robins Co., Inc., et al.  (98-20478); Williams, et al V.  A.H. Robins Co., Inc., et al.  (98-20478); Boxie, et al V.  A.H. Robins Co., Inc., et al (98-20108); Hill et al.  V.  American Home Products Corp., et al (98-20108); Dorothy & Donald Litchfield V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corp., et al.  (00-20022); Powell V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corp., et al.  (00-20958); Reynolds V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (00-21013); Dial, et al.  V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, et al.  (00-20908); Veron V.  Gate Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.  (99-20090); Wilkinson, et al.  V.  A.H. Robins Co., Inc., et al.  (00-21027); Wrinkle V.  A.H. Robins Co., Inc., et al (99-20653)

6/21/01

2031

Re: Sheila Brown, et al V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, pursuant to the court=s reason ruling as stated at a hearing held this 21st day of June, 2001, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiffs listed on the attached Exhibit A are declared to have timely and validly opted-out of the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement in Brown v.  American Home Products Corp., Civ.  No.  99-20593 (ANationwide Settlement@).

        Furthermore, as expressed at said hearing, it is the court=s policy that persons who submitted initial opt-out forms and/or opt-out letters before the March 30, 2000 initial opt-out deadline established by Pretrial Order No.  997, and that subsequently perfected deficiencies in those submissions pursuant to the terms of deficiency letters issued by the Interim Claims Administrators (AICAs@), are, as a general matter, considered to have validly opted-out of the Nationwide Settlement.         SO ORDERED.

6/25/01

2032

Re: This Order relates to the cases listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 25th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order

6/25/01

2033

Re: HMO Louisiana, Inc.  V.  AHP Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst, Div.  of AHP Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Gate Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc., SmithKline Beecham Corp., Abana Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Richwood Pharmaceuticals Co., Inc., Ion Laboratories, Inc., Medeva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., A.H. Robins Co., Inc., Camall Co., Goldline Laboratories, EON Labs Manufacturing, Inc., Laboratories Servier SA, Fisons Corp., Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc., ORSEM, ORIL, Produits Chimiques, Servier Amerique, Institut De Recherchers Internationales Servier, I.R.I.S., Science-Union et cie, and Does 1-100, inclusive

         AND NOW, TO WIT: This 25th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

          ORDERED that the above action DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.          It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case can be marked closed

6/25/01

2034

Re: This Order relates to the cases listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 25th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

        ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

         It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order

6/25/01

2035

Re: This Order relates to the cases listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 25th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

        ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

         It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order

6/25/01

2036

Re: This Order relates to the cases listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 25th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order.

6/27/01

2037

Re: This Order relates to the cases listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 27th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.Exhibit A attached to Order.

6/27/01

2038

Re: This Document relates to all cases listed on Exhibit A

       AND NOW, TO WIT: This 27th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order.

6/27/01

2039

Re: Bonnie Neace V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (00-20940)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 27th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions to Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

        ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.        It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case can be marked closed.

6/27/01

2040

Re: This Order relates to the cases listed in Exhibit A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: this 27th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between parties in the above actions have settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this court, it is

        ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order.

6/27/01

2041

Re: This document relates to all cases listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 27th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto having been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order.

6/27/01

2042

Re: This document relates to all cases captioned on Exhibit A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 27th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions captioned on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions captioned on Exhibit A are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order.

6/27/01

2043

Re: This Order relates to the cases listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 27th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

        ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order.

6/27/01

2044

Re: Linda Denson V.  A.H. Robins Co., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Div.  of AHP Corp; American Home Products, Inc., Albertson=s, Inc.

REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND PRETRIAL ORDER NO.  1255

This is a dismissal with prejudice of an ENTIRE

civil action in MDL No.  1203

Plaintiff:                               1.  Linda Denson

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pretrial Order No.  1255 Linda Denson voluntarily dismisses with prejudice Civil Action No.

00-20029 as to all named Defendants, which are as follows:

                                              1.  A.H. Robins Co., Inc.

                                              2.  Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., Div.  of AHP Corp.

                                              3.  American Home Products, Inc.

                                              4.  Albertson=s, Inc.         This case can be marked closed.`

6/27/01

2045

Re: Sheila Brown, et al V.  American Home Products Corp.

     ( ORDER AUTHORIZING AHP SETTLEMENT TRUST TO ENTER INTO TWO CONTRACTS WITH ERNST & YOUNG LLP)   

      AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2001, it having been represented to the Court by the AHP Settlement Trust (Athe Trust@) that the Trust has entered into an Agreement of Assessment of Vendor Technology, the services under which constitute Supplemental Services within the meaning of the Agreement for Accounting and Related Services approved by this Court by way of Pretrial Order No.  1580 on May 16, 2001; that the Agreement was negotiated at arms length; that the Agreement calls for the performance of services which the Trust has considered to be necessary for the effective continuation and completion of its duties and obligations; that the services described therein have been completed and were disclosed to the Parties and the Court at or about the time of rendition thereof; and that disclosure of the terms of the Agreement would not be in the best interests of the Trust;        It is hereby ORDERED that the AHP Settlement Trust is authorized to enter into an Agreement for Assessment of Vendor Technology with Ernst & Young LLP on terms that are the same as those that were exhibited to the Court

6/28/01

2046

Re: ALL ACTION              FILED UNDER SEAL

6/28/01

2047

Re: Jabie Abercrombie, et al V.  American Home Products, et al (01-20102); Susie McKelvey, et al V.  American Home Products, et al (01-20064); and Lorraine Frank, et al V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Labs, et al (01-20065)

       AND NOW, TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is        ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

6/28/01

2048

Re: Ellen Ann Robinson V.  American Home Products Corporation (01-20103)

      It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the above-entitled action may be dismissed as to all defendants with the following docket markings:      >@Voluntary dismissal with prejudice.  No costs.  No further action for the same cause.@



6/28/01

2049

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of the Fifteenth Application by Escrow Agent for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (5/01/01 through 5/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $3,809.06 for the period from 5/1/01 through 5/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                                   BY THE COURT

6/28/01

2050

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of the Fifth Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (4/01/01 through 4/30/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $44,879.86 for the period from 4/1/01 through 4/30/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                                   BY THE COURT

6/28/01

2051

Re: Joy Audibert V.  American Home Products, et al (98-20077)

      CONSIDERING THE FOREGOING:       IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above captioned matter is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs

6/28/01

2052

Re: Cases listed on Exhibits

      AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2001, it is ORDERED that the Decision and Recommendation No.  87 of Special Discovery Master (as to Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Various Defendants) is AFFIRMED.

       It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs= cases listed on Exhibit A shall be marked Aclosed@ by the Clerk of Court.

       It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants listed on Exhibit A are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE from the cases listed on Exhibits B through N of Decision and Recommendation No.  87.

                                                     BY THE COURTExhibits A-N attached to Order.

6/28/01

2053

Re: Sheila Brown, et al V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of June, 2001, the Court finds that:

      1.  The Honorable C.  Judson Hamlin and Gregory P.  Miller, Esquire, Interim Claims Administrators to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement with American Home Products Corporation, have fulfilled all duties with which they were charged by this Court; and

       2.  By the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Orders of this Court, the term for position of the Interim Claims Administrators has expired.

       THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:

       1.  The Interim Claims Administrators are hereby forever discharged and released from all duties and liabilities under and/or relating to their duties as Interim Claims Administrators to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement with American Home Products Corporation;

       2.  The Interim Claims Administrators shall be accorded the indemnity provided for in the Settlement Agreement, Orders of this Court and related documents; and

       3.  The Interim Claims Administrators shall have no further liability to any persons based upon claims regarding their actions or inactions as Interim Claims Administrators.                                            BY THE COURT

6/28/01

2054

Re: Susan K.  Hosford V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, et al (00-20252)

      REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND PRETRIAL ORDER NO.  1255

This is a dismissal with prejudice of an ENTIRE CIVIL ACTION in MDL Docket No.  1203.

Plaintiff: 1.   Susan Hosford

pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pretrial Order No.  1255 voluntarily dismisses with prejudice Civil Action No.  00-20252 against the following defendant:...

6/28/01

2055

Re: Mary Vetter V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, American Home Products Corporation, and United Research Laboratories and Mutual Pharmaceutical Company (99-20857)

       REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND PRETRIAL ORDER NO.  1255

Plaintiff: 1.  Mary Vetter

pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pretrial Order No.  1255 voluntarily dismisses with prejudice Civil Action No.  99-20857 as to the named Defendants which follow:

6/28/01

2056

Re: Patricia Jackman V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20218)

      COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Patricia Jackman, by and through her below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorneys fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

6/28/01

2057

Re: Edith & Alfred Kyle, Jr.  V.  AHP Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs.  Co., Wyeth Labs., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and John Does 1-50, Inclusive (00-20140)

       COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Edith Kyle and Alfred Kyle, Jr., wife and husband, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

        Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;        IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

6/28/01

2058

Re: Margaret & John Suazo V.  AHP Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs.  Co., Wyeth Labs, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and John Does 1-50, Inclusive (00-20177)

       COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Margaret Suazo, wife and husband, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

        Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;        IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

6/28/01

2059

Re: Noreen and Del Chapman V.  AHP Corp., Wyeth Labs., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs.  Co., a division of AHP Corp., and John Does 1-50, Inclusive (00-20176)

      COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Noreen Chapman and Del Chapman, wife and husband, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

6/28/01

2060

Re: Pamela and William H.  Aldrich V.  AHP Corp., Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs.  Co., a div.of AHP Corp., & John Does 1-50, Incl.  (00-20211)

      COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Pamela Aldrich and William H.  Aldrich, wife and husband, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

6/28/01

2061

Re: Jan L.  and Lynn Mitchell V.  AHP Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs.  Co., Wyeth Labs., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., & John Does 1-50, Incl.  (00-20154)

      COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Jan L.  Mitchell and Lynn Mitchell, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

6/28/01

2062

Re: Jill G. & Timothy D.  Noyes V.  American Home Products Corp.  (01-20047)

      STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

      It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the above-entitled action may be dismissed as to all defendants with the following docket markings:      AVoluntary dismissal with prejudice.  No costs.  No further action for the same cause.

6/28/01

2063

Re: Carol M.  Lovely & Mark M.  Tailon V.  AHP Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation (01-20121)

      STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

       It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the above-entitled actions may be dismissed as to all defendants with the following docket markings:       AVoluntary dismissal with prejudice.  No costs.  No further action for the same cause.@

6/29/01

2064

Re: Sheila Brown, Sharon Gaddie, Vivian Naugle, Quintin Layer, and Joby Jackson-Reid, Individually and all others similarly situated V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

       And now, this 29th day of June, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED that: ...

6/29/01

2065

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 29th day of June, 2001, presently before the court is a Motion of plaintiff Donna Henderson to Alter or Amend the Decision and Recommendation No.  88 of the Special Discovery Master, with respect to his finding that Mrs.  Henderson provided Fact Sheets in this civil action, which were substantially incomplete.  The Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

        SO ORDERED.                                                               BY THE COURT

6/29/01

2066

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      WHEREAS, an Order was entered on May 29, 2001, in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in the action captioned, Koken v.  Reliance Insurance Company, No.  269 MD 2001, placing the Reliance Insurance Company (AReliance@) into Rehabilitation;

        WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 22 of the Commonwealth Court=s Rehabilitation Order, Aall actions currently pending in the Courts of Pennsylvania or elsewhere against an insured of Reliance are stayed for 60 days of such additional time as the Rehabilitator may request@;

         WHEREAS, Defendant Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (AInterneuron@) is an insured of Reliance;          In deference to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all proceedings in every case pending in MDL Docket No.  1203 in which Interneuron is a named defendant are therefore STAYED until July 30, 2001, and for such additional time as the Rehabilitator may request.

7/09/01

2067

Re: Margaret Hennenberry V.  American Home Products, et al (01-20022)

      The Motion of plaintiff, TIMOTHY HENNENBERRY, Independent Administrator of the ESTATE OF MARGARET HENNENBERRY in the above-entitled action for an Order Substituting Administrator and for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 15, Federal Rules Civil Procedure, good cause appearing therefore;

        IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff=s Motion For An Order Substituting Administrator and for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 15, Federal Rules Civil Procedure, in the above case is hereby granted and that the Second Amended Complaint is deemed filed.(Judge Bartle=s first Pretrial Order)

7/09/01

2068

Re: Vickie Beyers V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., & A.H. Robins Co., Inc.  (00-20770)      Now this 9th day of July, 2001, Frank Harrison, a son and next of kin of Vickie Beyers who came to her death on the 10th day of March, 2001, having presented his motion to be appointed Special Administrator of the Estate of Vickie Beyers in order to prosecute a wrongful death action filed under the laws of the State of Illinois and it appearing to the court that the only asset of the deceased estate is a cause of action arising under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, that no Petition for Letters of Office for the Estate has been filed and that the next of kin, to wit, the only persons who would be entitled to a recovery under the Wrongful Death Act having been consented to the appointment of Frank Harrison as Special Administrator, said motion is hereby allowed and Frank Harrison is hereby appointed Special Administrator of the Estate of Vickie Beyers for the purpose of prosecuting a wrongful death action against the defendants in this action.  The Amended Complaint filed with the motion to appoint a Special Administrator is hereby ordered to be filed and the defendants in this action.  The Amended Complaint filed with the motion to appoint a Special Administrator is hereby ordered to be filed and the defendants are to respond to said complaint within 21 days of the receipt of a copy of this order

7/09/01

2069

Re: Christine Gonzalez V.  Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., a subsidiary of American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation, and American Home Products Corporation (99-20599)

      AGREED ORDER ON SECOND AMENDED PETITION FOR COURT AUTHORIZATION OF FEE DIVISION IN EXCESS OF 25%

       THIS CAUSE, having come on upon Petitioners=, ALLEY & INGRAM, P.A., and J.  GORDON ROTHWELL, ESQ., agreement for a fifty percent/fifty percent division of the attorney fees, and the court being fully informed herein, it is hereby

        ORDERED AND ADJUSTED that said Second Amended Petition for Court Authorization of Fee Division in Excess of Twenty-Five Percent is hereby granted, authorizing for a fifty percent/fifty percent (50%/50%) division of attorney fees between Petitioners.         DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania this 9th day of July, 2001.

7/10/01

2070

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 10th day of July, 2001, upon consideration of the Thirty Eighth Application by Special Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement Expenses (5/01/01 through 5/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $27,760.25 for the period from 5/1/01 through 5/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                                             BY THE COURT

7/10/01

2071

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 10th day of July, 2001, upon consideration of the Sixth Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (5/01/01 through 5/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $34,994.39 for the period from 5/01/01 through 5/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                                        BY THE COURT

7/12/01

2072

Re: ALL ACTIONS   Filed Under Seal

7/13/01

2073

Re: Daniel Lancaster V.  American Home Products, et al (00-20034)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 13th day of July, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs

7/13/01

2074

Re: CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 13th day of July, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to the agreement of counsel without costs.

        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order.

7/13/01

2075

Re: Donald J.  Sonich, et al v.  A.H. Robins Company, et al (99-20498)

      AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2001, it is ORDERED that plaintiffs= notice of voluntary dismissal is approved.  The above captioned case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.                                                          BY THE COURT

7/13/01

2076

Re: Dianna Louis, individually and as guardian of the estates and persons of Kylie Brooks, and Nicholas Brooks, minor children V.  American Home Products, a Delaware corporation

       IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by counsel for the parties hereto that all claims in this action shall be dismissed with prejudice and without costs, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys fees.

  ORDER OF DISMISSAL        Based on the above stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys fees.

7/13/01

2077

Re: CASES ON EXHIBIT A and B

      AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that the Decision and Recommendation No.  88 of Special Discovery Master (as to Non-Compliant Plaintiffs) is AFFIRMED.

       It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiffs listed on Exhibit A appear before this Court to show cause why their cases should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution on Sept.  12, 2001 at 1:30 PM. 

        It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiffs listed on Exhibit B hereto appear before this Court to show cause why they should not be sanctioned for failure to fully comply with the fact sheet requirements of Pretrial Order Nos.  22 and 1530 on Sept. 12, 2001 at 1:30 PM.

                                                                BY THE COURTExhibits A and B attached to Order

7/13/01

2078

Re: Virginia Daticky V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (99-20217)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 13th day of July, 2001, upon consideration of the motion of Andrew C.  Allen, Esquire on behalf of WHATLEY DRAKE, LLC to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff named in the foregoing Civil Action, IT IS ORDERED that withdrawal of counsel is permitted, subject to the following conditions:

7/16/01

2079

Re: Dondra Gibson (99-20101) and Frances Prater (99-20116) V.  AHP, et al

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 16th day of July, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above referenced civil actions have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby       ORDERED that pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

7/16/01

2080

Re: Debra A.  Tetreault V.  Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al (01-20005)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 16th day of July, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above-captioned action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above-captioned action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

7/16/01

2081

Re: Donna A.  Kelley and Vernon C.  Kelley V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation; American Cyanamid Company; Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.; and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (01-20120)

       It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the above-entitled actions may be dismissed as to all defendants with the following docket markings:       AVoluntary dismissal with prejudice.  No costs.  No further action for the same cause.@

7/16/01

2082

Re: Joanne Sanderson V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Division of American Home Products Corporation; and A.H. Robins Company, Inc., Division of American Home Products Corporation (01-20040)      Pursuant to the provisions of Fed.  R.  Civ.  P.  41 (a)(1), the parties to the above-captioned matter, by their counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to the dismissal of all claims asserted in this action against defendants with prejudice and without costs, all appeal periods being waived.

7/17/01

2083

Re: Deborah Liddell, et al V.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc., et al (00-20743)

      AND NOW, this 17th day of July, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that Lukins & Annis, P.S., Leiff, Cabraser, Heimann, & Bernstein, L.L.P., and Keller Rohrback, L.L.P. may file a renewed motion to withdraw as counsel for plaintiffs on or before August 6, 2001.  Said motion shall include certification that movants have complied with Pretrial Order No.  1626.                                                     BY THE COURT

7/19/01

2084

Re: Status Conference of 7/18/01

      AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2001, at a hearing held on July 18, 2001, the court ruled as follows:...

7/19/01

2085

Re: Sickles, et al V.  Fisons Corp., et al (98-20728)      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 19th day of July, 2001, presently before the court is defendant Fisons Corporation (AFisons@) Motion to Strike Christopher T.  Rhodes, Ph.D. as a Case-Specific Expert Witness (Doc.  No.  202427) under Daubert V.  Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579.  In conformity with this transferee court=s policy of considering only Daubert challenges to witnesses identified as generic expert witnesses in more than 25 cases, IT IS ORDERED that the instant motion is hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Fisons to raise Daubert challenges to Dr.  Rhode=s testimony in the transferor court following remand

7/19/01

2086

Re: ALL ACTIONS/Sandra Adams, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-20610)

      THIS DAY, this cause came on for consideration of the parties= Joint Stipulation for Dismissal, and the Court having considered the same, finds that the Stipulation is well taken.  It is therefore,

       ORDERED AND ADJUSTED that this case is due to be and is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, as to defendants Glen Gallapsy, M.D., J.  Patrick Couch, M.D., Ted E.  Catranis, M.D., A.J. Mouton, M.D., Lisa Burch, M.D., John LaFleur, M.D., and Greg McKelvey, M.D., with each party to bear their own costs.        SO ORDERED AND ADJUSTED, this 19th day of July, 2001.

7/19/01

2087

Re: Andre Laborde V.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc., et al (00-20909)

      AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff=s motion for appeal (Doc.  No.  202551) is DENIED as moot.                                                       BY THE COURT

7/25/01

2088

Re: Carolyn Silas V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (98-20325)      AND NOW, this 25th day of July  2001, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of plaintiff to continue the status conference (#202588) is DENIED AS MOOT

7/25/01

2089

Re: Karen S.  Mills, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (00-20754)      AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that the unopposed motion of plaintiff Karen S.  Mills to Continue Status Conference is GRANTED.  Accordingly, defendant American Home Products Corporation=s Motion to Strike Class Action Allegations (Doc. #202336) and plaintiffs= Renewed Motion to Remand (Doc. #202393) shall be heard at the MDL 1203 Status Conference scheduled for Wednesday, September 12, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 16-A, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

7/25/01

2090

Re: John Phipps V.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc., et al.  (98-20116); Addie Brown V. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., et al (98-20340); Marilyn Diamond-Gray  V.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc., et al  (98-20235); Kim Swanberg V.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc., et al. (98-20294)      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 25th day of July, 2001, IT IS ORDERED that the motions to amend and remand in the above captioned civil actions (Doc.  Nos.  200721, 200722, 200724, 200731, & 200735) are hereby DENIED AS MOOT

7/25/01

2091

Re: Cindy Burton V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division, et al (99-20607)

      AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2001, presently before the court is the motion of American Home Products Corporation (AAHP@) to Strike Plaintiff Cindy Burton=s (APlaintiff@) First Amended Complaint (Doc.  No.  202482).  The court held oral argument on July 18, 2001.  ...

7/25/01

2092

Re: This Order Relates to the Cases Listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 25th day of July, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order.

7/25/01

2093

Re: Monica Carletto, et al.  (00-20147)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 25th day of July, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the plaintiffs Monica Carletto and Judith C.  Boulais, being less than all of the plaintiffs in the above action, and American Home Products Corporation, defendant in the above action, have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED:

       1.  that the above action is DISMISSED as to the aforesaid plaintiffs with

       prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel, without costs, and       2.  that this action is CONTINUED as to remaining plaintiffs.

7/27/01

2094

Re: Janice Brown V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (99-20263)

      AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2001, upon consideration of the motion of H.  Patterson McWhirter, Esquire on behalf of McWhirter, Bellinger, and Associates (Docket #202581) to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff Janice Brown, it is hereby ORDERED that withdrawal of counsel is permitted, subject to the following conditions: 

7/30/01

2095

Re: Jones V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (00-20783)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 30th day of July, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) o the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.       It is FURTHER ORDERED that the above case can be marked closed.

7/31/01

2096

Re: John R.  Lolley V.  American Home Products, et al.  (01-20126)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 31st day of July, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

7/31/01

2097

Re: Joann Palmer Dunn V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (00-20125)      On this day the court considered the Unopposed Motion to Remand.  After considering the Motion, the court REMANDS this case to the 28th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas, under Cause No.: 00-2791-A.



7/31/01

2098

Re: Joanne Sampey V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (01-20033)

      AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2001, upon consideration of the motion of Edward M.  Swartz, Esquire, David P.  Angueira, Esquire, and Swartz and Swartz, (Docket #202586) to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff Joanne Sampey, it is hereby ORDERED that withdraw of counsel is permitted, subject to the following conditions:...

7/31/01

2099

AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2001, attached is a list of cases that are ready to be transferred to other judges in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.  The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign these cases in the same manner that new cases are normally assigned to judges.  The Clerk is further directed to forward copies of Pretrial Order No.  1962, together with copies of any supplements or amendments thereto, to the judges assigned.  Further, the parties shall forward the Generic Stipulated Record as well as the respective case-specific stipulated records to the judges assigned.

        I hereby rescue myself from receiving any of these cases for trial because the Multidistrict Litigation is still pending before me.

                                                    BY THE COURTMDL Transfer Listed No.  2: Gail Zeevi (99-20277)

7/31/01

2100

Re: Jean Konzman, Personal represenative of the Estate of Donald J.  Tagler, Deceased, V.  American Home Products Corporation and Medeva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  

      Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), it is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties to the above-captioned matter, through their undersigned counsel, the above-captioned action is discontinued with prejudice as to Medeva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  only.APPROVED AND SO ORDERED

7/31/01

2101

Re: Deborah and Jeffrey Liddell V.  A.H.Robins Co., Inc.; Eon Labs Manufacturing, Inc.; Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., a Division of American Home Products (00-20743)      AND NOW TO WIT this 31st day of July, 2001, upon consideration of the Renewed Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel for Plaintiffs, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said motion is GRANTED and the law firms of Lukins & Annis, P.S.; Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann, & Bernstein, L.L.P. all attorneys within the firms who have appeared as counsel for the plaintiffs in the above-captioned case shall be deemed to have withdrawn their appearances as counsel o record for the plaintiffs in this case.

8/02/01

2102

Re: Sheila Brown, Shannon Gaddie, Vivian Naugle, Quintin Layer, and Joby Jackson-Reid, Individually and all others similarly situated, V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      (Order Authorizing AHP Settlement Trust to Enter Into Interim Agreement Related to Claims Processing Services)

       AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2001, upon consideration of the attached form of Interim Agreement between the AHP Settlement Trust (Athe Trust@) and Seabury & Smith, Inc., and the Court having been advised that the terms of the attached Interim Agreement have been reviewed by the Board of Trustees appointed by this Court, that they were negotiated at arms= length, that the Board of Trustees views the entry into the Interim Agreement as necessary and proper for the continued orderly and economical processing of claims, and that the Parties do not oppose the entry of an Order authorizing the Trust to enter into the Interim Agreement with Seabury & Smith, Inc.  it is hereby ORDERED that the Trust may enter into an Interim Agreement with Seabury & Smith, Inc.  in the form attached hereto.

                                                              BY THE COURTInterim Agreement attached to Order

8/06/01

2103

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 6th day of August, 2001, upon consideration of the Seventh Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (6/01/01 through 6/30/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $37,100.97 for the period from 6/01 through 6/30/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                                   BY THE COURT

8/06/01

2104

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 6th day of August, 2001, upon consideration of the Thirty Ninth Application by Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (6/01/01 through 6/30/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $13,199.45 for the period from 6/1/01 through 6/30/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                                    BY THE COURT

8/06/01

2105

Re: Ann Martin-Outlaw V.  American Home Products Corp., Inc.  (00-20644)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 6th day of August, 2001, upon consideration of the motion of Thomas D.  Rogers, Esquire to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff named in the foregoing Civil Action, IT IS ORDERED that withdrawal of counsel is permitted, subject to the following conditions:  ...

8/06/01

2106

Re: ALL ACTIONS    FILED UNDER SEAL

8/07/01

2107

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2001, the court having received and reviewed the Special Master=s submission for approval of the attached Rules Governing Arbitration Process, it is hereby ORDERED that:

       (1) any objections to said proposed Arbitration Rules shall be filed with the court on or before August 24, 2001; and

       (2) argument on objections shall be held at the MDL 1203 Status Conference scheduled for September 12, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 16-A, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

                                                             BY THE COURTProposed Rules Governing Arbitration Process attached to Order

8/08/01

2108

Re: Maxine Sue Ross and Donald Ross, husband and wife V.  American Home Products Corporation (00-20220)

       IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by counsel for the parties hereto that all claims in this action shall be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL       Based on the above stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

8/08/01

2109

Re: Doris J.  Holman and James Holman, wife and husband V.  American Home Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation (00-20901)

       IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by counsel for the parties hereto that all claims in this action shall be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

       Based on the above stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.       DONE IN OPEN COURT

8/08/01

2110

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2001, upon consideration of the Motion by Plaintiffs= Management Committee And Class Counsel to Extend the Deadlines Established by Pretrial Order No.  2023, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED that:...

8/09/01

2111

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)      Presently, before the court is the motion for Elliot Palay to exercise an initial opt-out right or rescind his Accelerated Implementation Option (AAIO@) contract...

8/09/01

2112

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 9th day of August, 2001, Andrew C.  Clausen, Esquire of the law firm Alford, Clausen, & McDonald, LLC, has moved to withdraw as liaison counsel for the Diet Center defendants since he is no longer representing any defendants in the MDL fen-phen litigation.  The Court grants the motion of Andrew C.  Clausen, Esquire to withdraw as liaison counsel for the Diet Center defendants.  The Court will not at this time appoint anyone to fill such vacancy given the understanding that there are no Diet Center defendants who continue to be members of the MDL=s Diet Center group.                                                          BY THE COURT

8/10/01

2113

Re: Judith Velarde V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (98-20200)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 10th day of August, 2001, upon consideration of the motion of James Esparza to withdraw for the above referenced matter, IT IS ORDERED that the withdrawal of counsel is permitted, subject to the following conditions:...

8/14/01

2114

Re: ALL ACTIONS      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 14th day of August, 2001, upon consideration of the Sixteenth Application by Escrow Agent for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (6/01/01 through 6/30/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $4,959.05 for the period from 6/1/01 through 6/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court

8/16/01

2115

Re: Robert Dryer V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-21005)

      AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2001, upon consideration of the motion of Samuel M.  Pollak and Brian L.  Kinsley of the Law Offices of Hugo & Pollak, L.L.P. to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff (docket # 202607), IT IS ORDERED that the withdrawal of counsel is permitted, subject to the following conditions:...

8/21/01

2116

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 21st day of August, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

8/21/01

2117

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 21st day of August, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

8/21/01

2118

Re: Suzanne Patterson V.  AHP, a Delaware Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs.  Div.  of AHP, a Delaware Corp., and A.H. Robins, Inc., a Delaware Corp., Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware Corp., and John Doe and Jane Doe, as individuals and John Doe, a Corporation (00-20236)

       AND NOW, TO WIT: This 21st day of August, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been resolved and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, it is        ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.  All defendants are dismissed and this matter shall be marked closed.

8/21/01

2119

Re: Linda Miller V.  AHP Corp., a Delaware Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs.  Div.  of AHP, a Delaware Corp., and A.H. Robins, Inc., a Delaware Corp.  (00-20107)

       AND NOW, TO WIT: This 21st day of August, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been resolved and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.  All defendants are dismissed and this matter shall be marked closed.

8/21/01

2120

Re: Norma Anderson V.  AHP Corp., a Delaware Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs.  Div.  of AHP, Inc., a Delaware Corp., A.H. Robins Co., Inc., a Del.  Corp.  (00-20423)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 21st day of August, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been resolved and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.  All defendants are dismissed and this matter shall be marked closed.

8/27/01

2121

Re: Nancy C. McDaniel V. AHP, Inc., Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive

     Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;     IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

8/27/01

2122

Re: Kathleen Brumett and Crawford Brumett V. AHP, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, a division of AHP, Corp., Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive

     Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore:     IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, to bear their own costs and attorney fees

8/27/01

2123

Re: Carole West and John West V. AHP, Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company;  Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive

     Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;     IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

8/27/01

2124

Re: Julinda Kay Foland and Charles G. Foland V. AHP, Corp; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc; and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive

     Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;     IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

8/27/01

2125

Re: Linda M. Bateman and Alan Bateman V. AHP Corp., Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, a division of AHP Corporation, and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive

     Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore:     IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

8/27/01

2126

Re: Janice Thommen and Robert Thommen V. AHP, Corp.     The parties to this case, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Orders 445 and 680, hereby stipulate that this action against AHP Corporation and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of AHP Products Corporation be dismissed with prejudice.  Plaintiffs and Defendants AHP Corporation and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of AHP Corporation shall each bear their own costs.

8/27/01

2127

Re: Marilyn Leinenbach V. A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated and AHP Corp. And Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories (00-20769)     Plaintiffs and American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth Laboratories, Incorporated, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, and A.H. Robins Company (collectively, AAHPC@), by and through undersigned counsel, agree that AHPC shall have an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff=s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint up to and including August 31, 2001.

8/27/01

2128

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBITS A - L

   AND NOW, this 27th day of August, 2001, it is ORDERED that Decision and Recommendation No. 89 of Special Discovery Master (as to Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Various Defendants) is AFFIRMED.

     It is FURTHER ORDERED that:

      (1) Plaintiffs= cases listed on Exhibit A shall be marked Aclosed@ by the Clerk of

            Court.

      (2) Plaintiffs listed on Exhibit B shall file conforming captions with the Court

            Within thirty (30) days.

      (3) Defendants listed on Exhibits A and B are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

            From the cases listed on Exhibits C through L of Decision and Recommendation            No. 89.

8/28/01

2129

Re: Betty Johnson, Michelle Johnson, Terry Garcia, Dianne Shattuck, Leeann Smith and Camille Strasters V. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., et al. (00-21036)

     Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,     IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs= claims against A.H. Robins Company, Inc., and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, in the above captioned matter, be and hereby are dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys= fees.

8/28/01

2130

Re: Nelson B. Fox V. American Home Products, Inc., Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Laboratories Inc.  (98-20606)

     Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, and Pretrial Order No. 1255, plaintiff, Nelson Fox, requests a voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the following named defendants in Civil Action No. 98-20606:

          American Home Products, Inc.;

          Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

          Wyeth Laboratories Inc.This matter can be marked closed on the docket

8/28/01

2131

Re: Scott E. Johnson V. AHP Corporation, A.H. Robins Company, Inc., Oril, Servier Amerique, Institut De Rechrches Internationales Servier, Science Union Et Cie, Eon Labs Manufacturing, Inc., Ivax Corporation, Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Qualitest Products, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc., Novartis Ag, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Les Laboratoires Servier, Sa, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories (00-21043)

     Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pretrial Order No. 1255, Plaintiff Scott Johnson requests a voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the following named Defendants in Civil Action No. 00-21043:...

8/28/01

2132

Re: Julia Allen V. American Home Products Corporation, et al.     AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of August, 2001 it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above-styled cause have been settled and upon AOrder of the Court@ pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is ORDERED, that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.  All defendants are dismissed and this matter shall be marked closed.

8/28/01

2133

Re: Marie Person V. American Home Products Corp., et al. (01-20112)

     AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is     ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.  All defendants are dismissed and this matter shall be marked closed.

8/29/01

2134

Re: Relates to all actions FILED UNDER SEAL     AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2001, upon consideration of Plaintiffs= Management Committee=s Motion for Release and Use of Funds from the MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account, established by Gregory Miller, Esquire, Escrow Agent, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that said Motion is GRANTED and Gregory Miller, Esquire, is directed to make payment on invoices totaling Sixty Three Thousand One Hundred Seventy Seven Dollars and Five cents ($63,177.05) to the PMC Fen-Phen Litigation Account, by wire.

9/04/01

2135

Re: Vincent L.  Lagatutta, Jr.  V.  American Home Products Corp., et al (00-20909)

      AND NOW, this 4th day of September, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that:

      (1) the motion of plaintiff to withdraw and substitute (Doc.  No.  202626) is GRANTED;

      (2) the Clerk is directed to mark withdrawn the plaintiff=s motion and incorporated memorandum in support for substitution of plaintiff Vincent L.  Lagatutta, Jr.  for living heirs (Doc.  No.  202598);

       (3) the Clerk is directed to mark withdrawn the plaintiff=s motion and incorporated memorandum in support for leave of court to amend complaint (Doc.  No.  202599);

       (4) the motion of plaintiff for substitution of plaintiff Vincent L.  Lagatutta, Jr.  for living heirs and to amend complaint (Doc.  No.  202626) is GRANTED; and

       (5) the First Amended Complaint for Damages is deemed filed.                                                     BY THE COURT

9/05/01

2136

Re: Gina Bowden, et al V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, et al (00-20502)

      COMES NOW the Plaintiff and the Defendant, John Alan Wages, M.D., through their respective attorneys, and stipulate for their case to be dismissed with prejudice, and with each party to bear their own costs.       Dated this 23rd day of August, 2001.

9/05/01

2137

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 5th day of September, 2001, upon consideration of the Fortieth Application by Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (7/01/01 through 7/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $18,692.70 for the period from 7/1/01 through 7/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                                    BY THE COURT

9/05/01

2138

Re: Shirley Barker V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (98-20751)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 5th day of September, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above-styled cause has been settled and upon AOrder of the Court@ pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is ORDERED, that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.       It is further ordered that this case can be marked closed

9/05/01

2139

Re: Genevieve Lanuto, et al V.  American Home Products Corp., et al (00-20263)

      AND NOW, TO WIT this 5th day of Sept., 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of this Court, it is ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.       It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case can be marked closed.

9/05/01

2140

Re: Anna Bogden V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20741)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 5th day of September, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.       It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.

9/05/01

2141

Re: Darrell Brown V.  A.H. Robins Co., Inc., Allscrips Pharm., Inc.  (98-20759

      This is a dismissal with prejudice of AN ENTIRE civil action in MDL Docket No.  1203,

Plaintiff: 1.  Darrell Brown

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pretrial Order No.  1255 Darrell Brown requests a voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the following named Defendants in Civil Action No.  98-20759:

               1.  Allscrips Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  and

               2.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc.This matter can be marked closed on the docket.

9/07/01

2142

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 7th day of September, 2001, upon consideration of the Eighth Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (7/01/01 through 7/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $23,479.34 for the period from 7/1/01 through 7/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                             BY THE COURT

9/07/01

2143

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 7th day of September, 2001, upon consideration of the Seventeenth Application by Escrow Agent for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (7/01/01 through 7/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $1,857.06 for the period from 7/1/01 through 7/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                              BY THE COURT

9/10/01

2144

Re: Sheryl Henning (1999-20306)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 10th day of September, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.       It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case can be marked closed..

9/10/01

2145

Re: ALL CASES ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 10th day of September, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

      ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.       It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed

9/10/01

2146

Re: Doris Drewry V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (1998-20654)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 10th day of September, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.       IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case can be marked closed.



9/11/01

2147

Re: CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 11th day of September, 2001, the court issues the following Order to Show Cause:...

9/11/01

2148

Re: CASES ON EXHIBIT 1

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 11th day of September, 2001, the court issues the following Order to Show Cause:...

9/12/01

2149

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 12th day of September, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

9/12/01

2150

Re: Karen Mills, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-20754)

      AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2001, upon consent of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff=s renewed motion to remand (Doc. # 202393) is GRANTED.  This case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Cleburne County, Alabama.                                                    BY THE COURT

9/12/01

2151

Re: Brenda Christian (01-20111); Betty Youngblood (01-20105); Marilyn Gregg (01-20048); Ronald Sawyer (01-20068); Linda Bailey (01-20119); Edward Valentine (01-20132); Tina Saavedra (01-20067) V.  AHP

       AND NOW, upon consideration of the Joint Motion for Extension of Discovery Schedule in Cases Subject to Pretrial Order No.  2066 filed by Defendants Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  and American Home Products Corporation,        IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the discovery schedule in each of the above-captioned cases is hereby extended for 30 days, provided that such extension does not apply to discovery deadlines which had elapsed prior to entry of Pretrial Order No.  2066 on June 29, 2001.

9/12/01

2152

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      This Order is to clarify further Pretrial Orders Nos.  467 and 517, as they relate to the 9% assessment against payments made by the defendants to settle claims or to satisfy judgements (collectively referred to as AClaim Payments@) in actions subject to coordinated pretrial proceedings in MDL 1203.  Defendants are required to withhold 9% from the gross amount of each Claim Payment for deposit into the MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account.  Upon receipt of the balance of the Claim Payment, a plaintiff=s attorney is required to determine the amount owed to the attorney under the terms of his or her retention agreement and reduce the amount withheld under the 9% assessment.  The plaintiff=s recovery shall not be affected by the 9% assessment.  To ensure compliance with Pretrial Orders Nos.  467 and 517, it is hereby ORDERED that:...

9/12/01

2153

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2001, the court having received no objections to the Rules Governing Arbitration Process, it is hereby ORDERED that said Arbitration Rules, attached as Exhibit A, are APPROVED.

                                                               BY THE COURTArbitration Rules attached to Order

9/12/01

2154

Re: 12 cases V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, Inc.

      AND NOW, to wit, upon consideration of Plaintiffs= Management Committee=s Motion for Ancillary Relief in Connection with Davis & Feder=s Previously Filed Remand Motions, it is hereby       ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED that the agreement of counsel is APPROVED.

9/12/01

2155

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2001, at a hearing held on September 12, 2001, the court ruled as follows:

       1.  The Motion of Objectors Counsel for Clarification and Request for an Evidentiary Hearing in Brown, Civ.  No.  99-20593 (Doc. # 202597) shall be heard on October 17, 2001 at 12:30 p.m. in Courtroom 16-A, 16th Floor, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

       2.  The next status conference will be held on November 14, 2001 at 10:00a.m. in Courtroom 16-A, 16th Floor, blah, blah, blah, same as above #1.                                                         BY THE COURT

9/13/01

2156

Re: 9 Cases V.  Dexfenfluramine Defendants

      AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that:

      (1) the motion of defendant Jenny Craig for payment of fees (Doc. # 201444) is DENIED AS MOOT; and      (2) the motion of defendant Jenny Craig for in camera inspection of documents and to seal motion for payment of fees (Doc. # 201494) is DENIED AS MOOT

9/14/01

2157

Re: Mary Kay Allen V.  American Home Products, et al.  (01-20146)      AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that the clerk is directed to close the above captioned case, Allen V.  American Home Products, et al., Civ.  No.  01-20146.

9/17/01

2158

Re: Robert Dryer V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-21005)

      AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that:

      1.  The motion of plaintiff for relief from Pretrial Order No.  2115 (Doc.  No.  202630) is GRANTED.  Plaintiff shall have until September 29, 2001 to secure new counsel.

       2.  The motion of plaintiff for continuance for additional time within the existing scheduling order (Doc.  No.  202631) is GRANTED in part.  The matter of plaintiff=s compliance with Pretrial Order Nos.  417 and 1467 and Fed.  R.  Civ.  P.  26 (a) (2) will not be heard at Show Cause Hearing scheduled for September 24, 2001.  It will be heard at the next Show Cause Hearing, on a date to be determined.  To the extent that plaintiff seeks an extension of time to disclose case-specific experts, the motion is held in abeyance until the next Show Cause Hearing.                                                          BY THE COURT

9/17/01

2159

Re: Sharon Hill-Roberts V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (00-20987)

      AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2001, after written direction of counsel for defendant Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to mark withdrawn the motion of defendant Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  to stay proceedings (Doc. # 202624).                                                           BY THE COURT

9/18/01

2160

Re: Susan J.  Rowe V.  AHP Corp., individually and as successor in interests for A.H. Robins Co., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs Div.  of AHP Corp., Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., SmithKline Beecham Corp., and EON Labs Manufacturers, Inc.  (00-20346)       Pursuant to Rule 41 (a) (1) (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all parties by their respective counsel hereby stipulate that this action, including all claims, cross-claims, and counterclaims asserted therein, be dismissed with prejudice without costs to any party and with all rights of appeal waived

9/18/01

2161

Re: Joan Kinder Hibbard V.  AHP Corp., individually and as successor in interests for A.H. Robins Co., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs Division of AHP Corp., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (01-20021)      Pursuant to Rule 41 (a) (1) (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all parties by their respective counsel hereby stipulate that this action, including all claims, cross-claims, and counterclaims asserted therein, be dismissed with prejudice without costs to any party and with all rights of appeal waived.

9/18/01

2162

Re: Patricia Spencer V.  AHP Corp., individually and as successor in interests for A.H. Robins Co., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs Division of AHP Corp.  (01-20034)      Pursuant to Rule 41(a) (1) (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all parties by their respective counsel hereby stipulate that this action, including all claims, cross-claims, and counterclaims asserted therein, be dismissed with prejudice without costs to any party and with all rights of appeal waived

9/18/01

2163

Re: G.  Dean Brown V.  AHP Corp., individually and as successor in interests for A.H. Robins Co., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs Division of AHP Corp., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (01-20015)       Pursuant to Rule 41 (a) (1) (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all parties by their respective counsel hereby stipulate that this action, including all claims, cross-claims, and counterclaims asserted therein, be dismissed with prejudice without costs to any party and with all rights of appeal waived.

9/18/01

2164

Re: Elizabeth Lynch V.  AHP Corp., individually and as a successor in interests for A.H. Robins Co., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs Div.  of AHP Corp.  (01-20045)      Pursuant to Rule 41 (a) (1) (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all parties by their respective counsel hereby stipulate that this action, including all claims, cross-claims, and counterclaims asserted therein, be dismissed with prejudice without costs to any party and with all rights of appeal waived.

9/18/01

2165

Re: Rachel Powell V.  AHP Corp., individually and as successor in interests for A.H. Robins Co., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs Div.  of AHP Corp.  (01-20035)      Pursuant to Rule 41 (a) (1) (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all parties by their respective counsel hereby stipulate that this action, including all claims, cross-claims, and counterclaims asserted therein, be dismissed with prejudice without costs to any party and with all rights of appeal waived.

9/18/01

2166

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 18th day of August, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order.

9/18/01

2167

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 18th day of August, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order.

9/19/01

2168

Re: Mary Moon V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, et al (98-20536)

      AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of plaintiff Mary Moon for reconsideration, to amend, alter, or vacate, and for other relief (Doc.  No.  202573) is DENIED.

      At his deposition Dr.  Glenn R.  McDaniel could only testify that plaintiff=s aortic regurgitation and ventricle size were Aperhaps@ attributable to diet drug use.  That is insufficient under Alabama law which requires a plaintiff to prove that defendant=s conduct was Amore likely than not@ the cause of her injury.  See State Farm Fire & Gas Co.  V.  Slade, 747 So.  2d 293, 326 (Ala.  1999); J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.  V.Credeur, 681 So.  2d 1355, 1361 (Ala.  1996).  Moreover, the submissions of Dr.  Donald H.  Marks are clearly out of time.                                                          BY THE COURT

9/21/01

2169

Re: ALL ACTIONS          UNDER SEAL

9/21/01

2170

Re: ALL ACTIONS LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      All parties to the actions listed on Exhibit A attached hereto, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate that the actions listed on attached Exhibit A have been settled, and should be dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party.Exhibit A attached to Order.

9/24/01

2171

Re: ALL ACTIONS LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 24th day of September, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order.

9/25/01

2172

Re: Judith Ann Verchio V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, American Home Products Corporation, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (99-20598)      Plaintiff, Judith Ann Verchio, pursuant to Rule 41 (a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Stipulation of Dismissal of the action with prejudice with prejudice signed by counsel for all parties who have appeared in this action...

9/25/01

2173

Re: Pam Noterman and John Noterman V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, American Home Products Corporation, and Interneuron Company, Inc.  (00-21037)      Plaintiffs, Pam and John Noterman, pursuant to Rule 41 (a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Notice of Dismissal of the action with prejudice before by any adverse party of an answer or of a motion for summary judgement

9/25/01

2174

Re: Sally H.  Grafentin V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, American Home Products Corporation, and A.H. Robins Company, Inc.  (99-20589)      Plaintiff, Sally H.  Grafentin, pursuant to Rule 41 (a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Notice of Dismissal of the action with prejudice before service by any adverse party of an answer or of a motion for summary judgement

9/25/01

2175

Re: Daniel Kissane V.  American Home Products Corporation, individually and as successor in interests for Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated (00-21135)      Pursuant to Rule 41 (a) (1) (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all parties by their respective counsel hereby stipulate that this action, including all claims, cross-claims, and counterclaims asserted therein, be dismissed with prejudice without costs to any party and with all rights of appeal waived

9/26/01

2176

Re: RELATES TO THE CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 26th day of September, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

       It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order.

9/26/01

2177

Re: Katie B.  Jackson, Lisa Washington, Cheryl Williams, Kimberly Huff V.  AHP Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Labs, a Div.  of AHP Corp., A.H. Robins Co., Inc., Condon=s East Union Pharmacy, Inc., Quality Drugs, Inc., Defendants A, B, C, & D, Being Those Persons, Firms, or Corporations Whose Fraud, Scheme to Defraud, and/or Other Wrongful Conduct Caused or Contributed to the Plaintiff=s Injuries and Damages, and Whose True Names and Identities are Presently Unknown to the Plaintiffs but will be Substituted by Amendment When Ascertained

       AND NOW, TO WIT: This 26th day of September, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.        It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case can be marked closed.

9/28/01

2178

Re: Gwen Washington, et al V.  American Home Products Corporation and George B.  Inge, MD (00-21025)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the complaint and all claims of plaintiffs Janet Freeman and Michelle McCool in the above-captioned matter against Defendants American Home Products Corporation be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.                                                    BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2179

Re: Dinetra Brinkley V.  American Home Products Corporation, A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the complaint and all claims of plaintiff Dinetra Brinkley in the above-captioned matter against Defendants American Home Products Corporation, A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  be and hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.                                                    BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2180

Re: Deborah H.  Hoover V.  American Home Products Corporation, A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (98-20662)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the complaint and all claims of plaintiff Deborah H.  Hoover in the above-captioned matter against Defendants American Home Products Corporation, A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.                                                   BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2181

Re: Vincent Calcagno V.  American Home Products Corporation, A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc..  (00-21057)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the complaint and all claims of plaintiff Vincent Calcagno in the above-captioned matter against Defendants American Home Products Corporation, A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.                                                    BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2182

Re: Christy Dawn Hoover Thibodeaux, and Amy Ryan Hoover V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (99-20375)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the complaint and all claims of plaintiffs Christy Dawn Hoover Thibodeaux and Amy Ryan Hoover in the above-captioned matter against Defendants American Home Products Corporation, A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.                                                    BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2183

Re: Clifton Harold Jackson, et al.  V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation and American Home Products Corp.  (00-20206)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the complaint and all claims of plaintiff Allegro Nevella Scott in the above-captioned matter against Defendants Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation and American Home Products Corporation be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.                                                   BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2184

Re: Mary Ann Albanese and Ernest Albanese V.  American Home Products Corporation, A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (00-20351)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the complaint and all claims of plaintiffs Mary Ann Albanese and Ernest Albanese in the above-captioned matter against Defendants American Home Products Corporation, A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.                                                        BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2185

Re: Lisa Tebault, et al V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (00-20271)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the complaint and all claims of plaintiffs Lisa Tebault, Individually and on behalf of her minor children, Anthony G.  Williams, Keira N.  Williams, Driantana A.  Kennedy, and Brian Kennedy, Jr., in the above-captioned matter against Defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.                                                      BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2186

Re: Evelyn McNeal, et al.  V.  Gate Pharmaceuticals, A Division of TEVA Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al (00-20822)

       AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the complaint and all claims of plaintiff Evelyn McNeal in the above-captioned matter against Defendants A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., American Home Products Corporation, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.                                                       BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2187

Re: Jeanette White V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (99-20183)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the complaint and all claims of plaintiff Jeanette White in the above-captioned matter against Defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.                                                       BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2188

Re: Marilyn Gregg V.  American Home Products Corporation, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (01-20048)

       AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the complaint and all claims of plaintiff Marilyn Gregg in the above-captioned matter against Defendants American Home Products Corporation and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.                                                      BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2189

Re: Maureen Gordon V.  American Home Products Corporation and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (00-21129)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the complaint and all claims of plaintiff Maureen Gordon in the above-captioned matter against Defendants American Home Products Corporation and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.                                                  BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2190

Re: Andre Laborde V.  American Home Products Corp., A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (00-20909)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff Andre Laborde shall make all case-specific expert witness disclosures required by Rule 26 (a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Pretrial Order Nos.  417 (6) and 1162 as to Defendants American Home Products Corporation, A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (collectively ADefendants@) on or before October 31, 2001.

        It is further ORDERED that failure to provide all case-specific disclosures required by this Order shall result in the dismissal with prejudice of the Complaint and all claims of Plaintiff Andre Laborde against the Defendants upon written notification to the Court by Defendants that plaintiff has not fully complied with this Order.                                                  BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2191

Re: Joanne Sampey V.  American Home Products Corp., and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation (01-20033)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001r, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff Joanne Sampey shall make all case-specific expert witness disclosures required by Rule 25 (a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Pretrial Order Nos.  417 (6) and 1162 as to Defendants American Home Products Corporation and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Products Corporation (collectively ADefendants@) on or before October 31, 2001.

       It is further ORDERED that failure to provide all case-specific disclosures required by this Order shall result in the dismissal with prejudice of the Complaint and all claims of plaintiff Joanne Sampey against the Defendants upon written notification to the Court by Defendants that plaintiff has not fully complied with this Order.                                                  BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2192

Re: Terry Lawrence V.  American Home Products Corp., and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation (00-21041)

       AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff Terry Lawrence shall make all case-specific expert witness disclosures required by Rule 26 (a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Pretrial Order Nos.  417 (6) and 1162 as to Defendants American Home Products Corporation and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation (collectively ADefendants@) on or before October 31, 2001.

       It is further ORDERED that failure to provide all case-specific disclosures required by this Order shall result in the dismissal with prejudice of the Complaint and all claims of plaintiff Terry Lawrence against the Defendants upon written notification to the Court by Defendants that plaintiff has not fully complied with this Order.                                                          BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2193

Re: Willie James Davis V.  American Home Products Corp.  (01-20036)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff Willie James Davis shall make all case-specific expert witness disclosures required by Rule 26 (a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Pretrial Order Nos.  417 (6) and 1162 as to Defendant American Home Products Corporation on or before October 31, 2001.

       It is further ORDERED that failure to provide all case-specific disclosures required by this Order shall result in dismissal with prejudice of the Complaint and all claims of plaintiff Willie James Davis against AHP upon written notification to the Court by AHP that plaintiff has not fully complied with this Order.                                                          BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2194

Re: Ruth Addison, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (99-20079)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff Sharon Oti shall make all case-specific expert witness disclosures required by Rule 26 (a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Federal Procedure, Pretrial Order Nos.  417 (6) and 1162 as to Defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (collectively ADefendants@) on or before October 31, 2001.

        It is further ORDERED that failure to provide all case-specific disclosures required by this Order shall result in the dismissal with prejudice of the Complaint and all claims of plaintiff Sharon Oti against the Defendants upon written notification to the Court by Defendants that plaintiff has not fully complied with this Order.                                                         BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2195

Re: Ruth Addison, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (99-20079)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff Joanne Dionisi shall make all case-specific expert witness disclosures required by Rule 26 (a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Pretrial Order Nos.  417 (6) and 1162 as to Defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (collectively ADefendants@) on or before October 31, 2001.

       It is further ORDERED that failure to provide all case-specific disclosures required by this Order shall result in the dismissal with prejudice of the Complaint and all claims of plaintiff Joanne Dionisi against the Defendants upon written notification to the Court by Defendants that plaintiff has not fully complied with this Order.                                                         BY THE COURT



9/28/01

2196

Re: Ruth Addison, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (99-20079)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff Essie Coleman shall make all case-specific expert witness disclosures required by Rule 26(a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Pretrial Order Nos.  417(6) and 1162 as to Defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (collectively ADefendants@) on or before October 31, 2001.

       It is further ORDERED that failure to provide all case-specific disclosures required by this Order shall result in the dismissal with prejudice of the Complaint and all claims of plaintiff Essie Coleman against the Defendants upon written notification to the Court by Defendants that plaintiff has not fully complied with this Order.                                                      BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2197

Re: Vivian C.  Woods V.  American Home Products Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (00-21026)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the Motion of Defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  for dismissal of the above-captioned action for plaintiff=s failure to provide case-specific expert reports be and is hereby DENIED without prejudice.                                                       BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2198

Re: Phyllis Cortez V.  American Home Products Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated (99-20636)

       AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the Motion of Defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated for dismissal of the above-captioned action for plaintiff=s failure to provide case-specific expert reports be and is hereby DENIED without prejudice.                                                      BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2199

Re: Sharon Boxie, et al.  V.  Gate Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.  (99-20108)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the Motion of Defendants Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., American Home Products, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  for dismissal of the claims of Lavernge Trump, a plaintiff in the above-captioned matter, for failure to provide case-specific expert reports be and is hereby DENIED without prejudice.                                                         BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2200

Re: Richard Whateley V.  American Home Products Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., Wyeth Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., et al.  (00-21053)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the Motion of Defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc.  for dismissal of the above-captioned action as to the plaintiff=s failure to provide case-specific expert reports be and is hereby DENIED without prejudice.                                                           BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2201

Re: Freda Giro, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of Kayla Giron, Michael Giron, and Alexander Giron V.  American Home Products Corp.  and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co.  (99-20409)

       AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the Court=s ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff Freda Giron, in her individual and representative capacities in the above-captioned action, shall make all case-specific expert witness disclosures required by Rule 26 (a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Pretrial Order Nos.  417(6) and 1162 as to Defendants American Home Products and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co.  (collectively ADefendants) on or before December 31, 2001.

       It is further ORDERED that failure to provide all case-specific disclosures required by this Order shall result in the dismissal with prejudice of the Complaint and all claims of plaintiff Freda Giron, in bother her individual and representative capacities, against the Defendants upon written notification to the Court by Defendants that plaintiff has not fully complied with this Order.                                                              BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2202

Re: Marie Hebert, et al V.  American Home Products, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (99-20098)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 28th day of September, 2001, in accordance with the ruling at the Show Cause Hearing conducted September 24, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff Valenessa Roberson shall make all case-specific expert witness disclosures required by Rule 26 (a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Pretrial Order Nos.  417 (6) and 1162 as to Defendants American Home Products, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (collectively ADefendants@) on or before October 31, 2001.

       It is further ORDERED that failure to provide all case-specific disclosures required by this Order shall result in dismissal with prejudice of the Complaint and all claims of plaintiff Valenessa Roberson against the Defendants upon written notification to the Court by Defendants that plaintiff has not fully complied with this Order.                                                           BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2203

Re: Roberta and Robert Wade V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division, A Division of American Home Products Corporation, EON Labs Manufacturing, Inc.  (01-20038)

      This is a Dismissal with prejudice of AN ENTIRE civil action in MDL 1203.

Plaintiffs: 1.  Roberta Wade

                2.  Robert Wade

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pretrial Order No.  1255, Plaintiffs Roberta Wade and Robert Wade request a voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the following named Defendants in Civil Action No.  01-20038:

                1.  American Home Products Corporation;

                2.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division, A Division of American Home Products Corporation; and

                3.  Eon Labs Manufacturing, Inc.

This matter can be marked closed on the docket.                                                    BY THE COURT

9/28/01

2204

Re: Donna Henderson V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (01-20007)

      AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2001, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a) (1) (ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.       Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Stipulation and Order shall not preclude the plaintiff in the above-captioned case from exercising any Intermediate or Back-End Opt-Out pursuant to the terms of the Nationwide Class Action Settlement with American Home Products Corporation (the ASettlement Agreement=), if and when said plaintiff becomes eligible to exercise such rights under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and further shall not preclude said plaintiff from instituting any claims permitted to be asserted under the terms of the Settlement Agreement if and when any such Intermediate or Back-End Opt-Out right is properly exercised.  Nor shall this Stipulation and Order preclude said plaintiff from applying for and receiving any benefits that said plaintiff may be entitled to under the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

10/02/01

2205

Re: Shirley Denise Falcone V.  American Home Products Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, A.H. Robins, Inc., Medeva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.  (00-20247)

      Upon stipulation of the parties, the Court finds that the case has been settled and the complaint should be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice as to all parties.

       IT IS SO ORDEREDAPPROVED AND STIPULATED

10/02/01

2206

Re: Alvin Lynn Walker V.  American Home Products, et al.  (99-20015)

      This is a dismissal with prejudice of an ENTIRE civil action in MDL No.  1203.

Plaintiff: 1.  Alvin Lynn Walker

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pretrial Order No.  1255 Alvin Lynn Walker voluntarily dismisses with prejudice Civil Action No.  99-20015 as to all named Defendants which are as follows:

              1.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc.;

              2.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Division of AHP Corp.

              3.  American Home Products, Inc.

This case can be marked closed.                                                              BY THE COURT

10/02/01

2207

Re: Janet Sanders V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (01-20084)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 2nd day of Oct., 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.       It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.

10/03/01

2208

Re: Gail McCartney V.  AHP Corp., A.H. Robins Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Does 1-100 Inclusive, Medeva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (98-20500)

      This is a dismissal with prejudice of AN ENTIRE civil action in MDL Docket No.  1203.

Plaintiff: 1.  Gail McCartney

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pretrial Order No.  1255, Plaintiff Gail McCartney requests a voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the following named Defendants in Civil Action No.  98-20500:

               1.  AHP Corp.;

               2.  A.H. Robins, Inc.;

               3.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co.;

               4.  Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

               5.  Does 1-100 Inclusive; and

               6.  Medeva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

       This matter can be marked closed on the docket.                                                         BY THE COURT

10/03/01

2209

Re: Debbie Olinger, Administratrix of the Estate of Doris Waddle V.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc., et al.  (98-20518)

      AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that defendants= motion to amend answer (Doc.  No.  202628) is GRANTED.  Defendants shall file and serve their amended answer within seven business days of the date of this order.                                                         BY THE COURT

10/05/01

2210

Re: CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 5th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants and of the entire action, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs..         It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed

10/09/01

2211

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2001, upon consideration of Plaintiffs= Management Committee=s Motion for Release and Use of Funds from MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account, established by Gregory Miller, Esquire, Escrow Agent, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that said Motion is GRANTED and Gregory Miller, Esquire, is directed to make payment on invoices totaling Twenty-Three Thousand Three Hundred Ninety-Two Dollars and Sixty-One cents ($23,392.61) to the PMC Fen-Phen Litigation Account, by wire transfer using the following routing number: 031-201-457 and account number: 2030000337576.                                                         BY THE COURT

10/10/01

2212

Re: Janis Lang V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (00-20235)

      AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.  All defendants are dismissed and this matter shall be marked closed.

10/10/01

2213

Re: Kathleen R.  Blaine V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (99-20089)

      AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.  All defendants are dismissed and this matter can be marked closed.

10/10/01

2214

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 10th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice ane without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

10/10/01

2215

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 10th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the action listed on Exhibit A hereto is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

10/10/01

2216

Re: ALL CASES ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 10th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the action listed on Exhibit A is hereto is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

10/10/01

2217

Re: Kermit Reynolds V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-21013)

      On this day came on to be heard Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Jeffrey D.  Lowenkron, M.D.  The Court, after reviewing said motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED.

      IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, that the claims and causes of action of Plaintiff, Kermit Reynolds, against Jeffrey D.  Lowenkron, M.D. are dismissed.

      IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each of the parties shall bear their own costs.      SIGNED this 10th day of October, 2001.

10/10/01

2218

Re: ACTIONS LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW TO WIT, this 10th day of October, 2001, a Show Cause Hearing was held on September 24, 2001 pursuant to Pretrial Order No.  2148.  None of the plaintiffs or counsel for plaintiffs= in the civil actions identified on the attached exhibit appeared to contest the dismissal of the actions.  Upon consideration of the arguments heard at said hearing and the failure of plaintiffs to appear to contest dismissal, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (b) the Phentermine Defendants identified in the attached exhibits are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from the civil actions listed thereon.

                                                       BY THE COURTExhibit A attached to Order

10/10/01

2219

Re: Janet Sanders V.  American Home Products Corporation, A.H. Robins Co., Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, Eon Labs Manufacturing, Inc., and SmithKline Beecham Corporation (01-20084)

      Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41 (a) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties to the above-captions matter, through their undersigned counsel, that the above-described action against defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs.  Plaintiff reserves her rights to pursue claims against all other defendants in this matter.                                                           APPROVED AND SO ORDERED

10/11/01

2220

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 11th day of October, 2001, upon consideration of the Eighteenth Application by Escrow Agent for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (8/01/01 through 8/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $1,572.25 for the period from 8/1/01 through 8/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                                            BY THE COURT

10/11/01

2221

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 11th day of October, 2001, upon consideration of the Forty-First Application by Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (8/01/01 through 8/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (8/01/01 through 8/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $31,061.96 for the period from 8/1/01 through 8/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                                           BY THE COURT

10/12/01

2222

Re: Jeanne Baker, Maria Valencia, Tina Thomas, Mirtha Breslin, and Theodore Har Ley V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division, a Division of American Home Products Corporation, American Home Products Corporation, and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated (00-20792)

      Upon stipulation of the parties, the Court finds that the complaint filed by Theodore Harley, the only remaining plaintiff, has been settled, and the complaint should be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice as to all parties.       IT IS SO ORDERED.

10/12/01

2223

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 12th day of October, 2001, upon consideration of the Ninth Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (8/01/01 through 8/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $31,560.56 for the period from 8/1/01 through 8/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                                            BY THE COURT

10/15/01

2224

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2001, in order to provide for the orderly and efficient presentation and determination of requests for the award of attorneys= fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses from: (1) the MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account established and maintained pursuant to Pretrial Order Nos.  467 and 517; and (2) the funds available for an award of counsel fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with American Home Products Corporation (the ASettlement Agreement@), which was approved by this Court in Pretrial Order No.  1415 (collectively the ADiet Drug Common Benefit Fee Sources@), and in order to clarify any potential ambiguities in Pretrial Order No.  2023 and to incorporate the deadlines set forth in Pretrial Order No.  2110, it is hereby

       ORDERED, ADJUSTED, AND DECREED that:...

10/15/01

2225

Re: Paulette Tate, individually and as a personal representative of the heirs of James B.  Tate, deceased V.  Dennis W.  Reimington, M.D., A.H. Robins Company, Inc., American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., and Does I through X (00-20251)

       Based upon the Stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUSTED, AND DECREED that

10/15/01

2226

Re: Julie McGee and Ron McGee V.  American Home Products, Inc., A.H. Robins Company, Inc., Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst, A Division of American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co.  (98-20765)

      This is a dismissal with prejudice of AN ENTIRE civil action in MDL 1203.

Plaintiffs: 1.  Julie McGee

                2.  Ron McGee

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pretrial Order No.  1255, Plaintiffs Julie McGee and Ron McGee request a voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the following named Defendants in Civil Action No.  98-20765:

                1.  American Home Products, Inc.,

                2.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc.,

                3.  Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

                4.  Wyeth-Ayerst, A Division of American Home Products Corp., and

                5.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company.

This matter can be marked closed in the docket.                                                            BY THE COURT

10/15/01

2227

Re: Billie Karen Mitchell V.  American Home Products Corp., A.H. Robins Company, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst, A Division of American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, Does 1-150, Inclusive (99-20341)

       This is a dismissal with prejudice of AN ENTIRE civil action in MDL 1203

Plaintiff: 1.  Billie Karen Mitchell

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pretrial Order No.  1255, Plaintiff Billie Karen Mitchell requests a voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the following named Defendants in Civil Action No.  99-20341:

               1.  American Home Products Corp.;

               2.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc.;

               3.  Wyeth-Ayerst, A Division of American Home Products Corporation;

               4.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; and

               5.  Does 1-150, inclusive.

This matter can be marked closed on the docket.                                                             BY THE COURT

10/15/01

2228

Re: Judith Dennis V.  American Home Products Corp., et al (01-20136)

      AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.  All defendants are dismissed and this matter shall be marked closed.

10/15/01

2229

Re: Doris Arensmeyer (01-20041); Ada Margaret Lynn (01-20011); Carolyn Silas (98-20325); Carolyn Wood and Donna Bosworth (01-20107) V.  American Home Products, et al       AND NOW, TO WIT, this 15th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above-styled causes have been resolved and upon AOrder of the Court@ pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is ORDERED, that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

10/16/01

2232

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 16th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the action listed on Exhibit A hereto is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

10/16/01

2233

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 16th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the action listed on Exhibit A hereto is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

10/16/01

2234

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 16th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

      ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the action listed on Exhibit A hereto is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

10/16/01

2235

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 16th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the action listed on Exhibit A hereto is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

10/16/01

2236

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 16th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the action listed on Exhibit A hereto is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

10/16/01

2237

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 16th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the action listed on Exhibit A hereto is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

10/16/01

2238

Re: Loretta and Stanley R.  Mersiovsky V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Labs, et al.  (99-20311)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 16th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed

10/16/01

2239

Re: John Ricketts V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, et al (98-20142)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 16th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

        ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed

10/16/01

2240

Re: Judith Val Rose V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (99-20676)      AND NOW, TO WIT: This the 16th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above styled cause has been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is ORDERED, that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs

10/16/01

2241

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 16th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the action listed on Exhibit A hereto is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

10/18/01

2242

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 18th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order

10/22/01

2243

PTO No.  2243 is an exact duplicate of PTO 2229

10/23/01

2244

Re: Mary W.  Vranes V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (01-20131)

      AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of plaintiff to dismiss amended complaint (Doc.  No.  202671) is GRANTED.  The above-captioned action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.                                                            BY THE COURT



10/23/01

2245

Re: Paula Auth, Sander Loggans, Melinda Gulledge, Leah Breland, Rosemary Caldwell, Charles Elliot V.  American Home Products Corporation d/b/a American Home Products, Inc., George B.  Inge, Dr.  (00-21025)

       AND NOW, TO WIT: This 23rd day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

        ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.         It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case is marked closed.

10/23/01

2246

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 23rd day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants and of the entire action, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order

10/24/01

2247

Re: Sheila Nolan V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (98-20615)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

10/24/01

2248

Re: Joetta Tucker V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (99-20020)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

10/24/01

2249

Re: Cosby Fannin V.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc., et al (98-20484)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

10/24/01

2250

Re: Mary Wright V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (98-20737)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

10/24/01

2251

Re: Elana Aitken V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-20954)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

10/24/01

2252

Re: Janice Christensen V.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc., et al.  (00-20559)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of this Court, it is hereby       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

10/24/01

2253

Re: Helen Rouse V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, et al.  (99-20831)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

10/24/01

2254

Re: Janice Fuller V.  EON Laboratories Manufacturing, et al.  (99-20066)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

10/24/01

2255

Re: Judith Bailey V.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc., et al.  (98-20193)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

10/24/01

2256

Re: Yulandus M.  Ballard V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (00-20751)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

10/24/01

2257

Re: Donna Deal V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (00-20903)

      AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named defendants.

10/24/01

2258

Re: Connie Mick V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (99-20602)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

10/24/01

2259

Re: Dareen Jones, et al.  V.  American Home Products, Inc., et al.  (99-20601)

      AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

10/24/01

2260

Re: Carol Bloom, Sarah Dahlgren, on behalf of themselves and all others situated, Jerry Rawis Toyes V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, Medeva Pharmaceuticals, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Rugby Laboratories, Inc., EON Labs Manufacturers, Inc.  (98-20047)

       AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties with respect to plaintiff Jerry Rawls-Toyes in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Jerry Rawls-Toyes in the above listed action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

10/24/01

2261

Re: Patricia Hall, Sharon Driber, Kimberly Breckling, Sandy Scarce, Barbara Mathenia, Catherine Peterson, Mary Haskell, Debra Harper, Dorothy Key, and Laurel Reutter V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation, and American Home Products Corporation (00-20040)

       AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties with respect to plaintiff Mary Haskell in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Mary Haskell in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

10/24/01

2262

Re: Rhonda Flynn, Renee Frederick, Marilyn Moore, Jessica Carmickle, Vickie Brewer V.  A.H. Robins Company, Inc., American Home Products, Inc., Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Rugby Laboratories, Inc., EON Labs Manu., Inc.  (98-20038)

       AND NOW TO WIT: This 24th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties with respect to plaintiffs Rhonda Flynn and Renee Frederick in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby         ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the claims of plaintiffs Rhonda Flynn and Renee Frederick in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

10/25/01

2263

Re: Cindy Burton V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division, et al.  (99-20607)      AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff=s motion to reconsider Pretrial Order 2091 (Doc.  No.  202616) is DENIED...

10/30/01

2264

Re: Celia Sue Kelly V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (98-20111)

      AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.  All defendants are dismissed and this matter shall be marked closed.

10/30/01

2265

Re: ALL ACTIONS     FILED UNDER SEAL

11/01/01

2266

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 1st day of November, 2001, upon consideration of the Forty-Second Application by Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (9/1/01 through 9/30/010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $25,541.82 for the period from 9/1/01 through 9/30/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the court.                                                                BY THE COURT

11/01/01

2267

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 1st day of November, 2001, upon consideration of the Tenth Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (9/1/01 through 9/30/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $14,924.41 for the period from 9/1/01 through 9/30/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                                                 BY THE COURT

11/05/01

2268

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2001, after consideration of the motion of American Home Products Corporation (AAHP@) to enforce PTO 1415 against Joseph and Betty Bullock, as well as letters from counsel for Joseph and Betty Bullock and counsel for AHP concerning said motion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

        (1) Joseph and Betty Bullock shall file and serve on or before November 30, 2001 any brief in opposition to the motion, together with any affidavits;

        (2) if no such opposing brief and/or affidavits are filed by that date, the court will consider the motion unopposed;

        (3) the court reserves the right to decide the motion on the papers alone; and

        (4) the Special Master shall serve a copy of this Order on counsel for Joseph and Betty Bullock.                                                                  BY THE COURT

11/05/01

2269

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO MOTION OF CHARLES AND ERMA BOOKER FOR LEAVE TO OPT-OUT

       It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED this 5th day of November, 2001 by and between Charles and Erma Booker and Defendant American Home Products Corporation (AAHP@), through their respective undersigned counsel, that AHP shall have an extension of time up to and including November 21, 2001 to respond to the Motion of Charles and Erma Booker For Leave to Opt-Out (Document # 202673).       This extension is for a period of less than thirty (30) days.  No prior extension has been requested or given in this matter.

11/06/01

2270

Re: Patricia Schnell V.  America Home Products Corporation (00-20750)

      AND NOW, this 6th day of November, 2001, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41 (a) (1) (ii), that the claims in the Complaint in the above-captioned matter are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all named Defendants with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.

       Plaintiff certifies that she complied with PTO 22 by producing a completed Fact Sheet, List of Medical Providers and property executed Authorization forms.

        This Stipulation is filed on behalf of the following Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, those being American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., against whom the claims in the Complaint shall be dismissed in their entirety with prejudice by the Court=s approval of this Stipulation.  Defendants also stipulate to DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE of all cross-claims filed by them in this action.                                              APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

11/06/01

2271

Re: Christi Daughrey V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-21120)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 6th day of November, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

11/06/01

2272

Re: Stephen C.  Swan V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, American Home Products Corporation (99-20440)

      The above entitled cause having been amicably adjusted between the parties hereto, Plaintiff having elected to participate in the Accelerated Implementation Option of the MDL class settlement, and the matter being subject to final resolution.

       IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto by their respective counsel that said cause shall and may be dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any of the parties hereto.

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL       IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled cause be and the same hereby is dismissed with prejudice and without costs of any of the parties hereto

11/07/01

2273

Re: RELATES TO ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 7th day of November, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

11/07/01

2274

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 7th day of November, 2001, upon consideration of the Nineteenth Application by Escrow Agent for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (9/01/01 through 9/30/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $2,268.65 for the period from 9/1/01 through 9/30/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.                                                           BY THE COURT

11/07/01

2275

Re: RELATES TO ALL ACTIONS ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 7th day of November, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants and of the entire action, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.        IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.

11/07/01

2276

Re: Betty A.  Palmer V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, et al.  (01-20014)

      AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff=s motion for Enlargement of Time to Provide Specific Expert Designation et al.  filed 5/1/01 (Doc.  No.  202481 in 12-MD-1203) is moot.                                                              ATTEST

11/07/01

2277

Re: Karen Krueger, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corp.  (01-20056)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 7th day of November, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

11/14/01

2278

Re: Sheila Brown, et al V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      (TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER)

       AND NOW, upon consideration of the emergency motion of American Home Products Corporation (AAHP@) for a temporary restraining order against Plaintiff Suzanne Jortner, it is hereby ORDERED that said motion is GRANTED....

11/15/01

2279

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2001, at a hearing held on November 14, 2001, the court ruled as follows:

       1.  The Motion of Objectors Counsel for Clarification and Request of an Evidentiary Hearing in Brown, Civ.  No.  99-20593 (Doc. # 202597) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

       2.  The Renewed Motion of Defendant Jenny Craig for Payment of Fees in Eggleston, Civ.  No.  98-20617, et al.  (Doc. # 202499) is hereby marked WITHDRAWN.

        3.  Counsel for plaintiffs shall file a supplemental brief in support of Plaintiffs= Motion for Exemption from PTO 467 and 517 and for Refund of Fees in Abercrombie, Civ.  No.  01-20102, et al.  (Doc. # 202654) within 15 days thereafter.

        4.  The Motion by AHP Settlement Trust for Court Approved Procedure to Authorized Steps to be taken by AHP Settlement Trust and Class Counsel Regarding Assistance to Pro Se Claimants in Brown, Civ.  No.  99-20593 (Doc. # 202685) is GRANTED.

         5.  The next status conference will be held on December 19, 2001 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 16-A, 16th Floor, United State Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.                                                                     BY THE COURT

11/27/01

2281

Re: Jabie Abercrombie, et al.  V.  Advanced Medical Weight Loss Center, Inc., et al. (01-20102)

      AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs= motion for leave to file a reply memorandum (Doc.  No.  202693) is GRANTED.                                                                     BY THE COURT

11/27/01

2282

Re: Theresa McKee V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (01-20106)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 27th day of November, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) o the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby      ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

11/27/01

2283

Re: Phyllis and Thomas Coleman V.  Teva and Gate Pharmaceuticals, A.H. Robins Co., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, and American Home Products Corp.

      Plaintiff notices the Court that Robert C.  Buck is to be substituted as attorney of record for Plaintiff in the above entitled action in place of Donald A.  Donati, who presently appears as attorney of record.       IT IS ORDERED, THEREFORE, that Robert C.  Buck be submitted as attorney of record in this action in the place of Donald A.  Donati

11/27/01

2284

Re: Jerrold J.  Burnett, Jr., a.k.a. Jerrold J.  Burnett V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Div.  of American Home Products Corporation (00-20246)

       ORDER SUBSTITUTING PARTY - DEATH OF PARTY

       UPON Motion by Plaintiff under F.R.C.P. 25 (a), and the Court being advised in the matter,

        IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff=s Motion to Substitute Party be and hereby granted, Jann E.  Burnett, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jerrold J.  Burnett, Deceased, is hereby substituted as party Plaintiff in place of Jerrold J.  Burnett.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action shall be captioned: AJann E.  Burnett, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jerrold J.  Burnett, Deceased, Plaintiff, v.  American Home Products Corporation, et al., Defendants.@                                                       BY THE COURT

11/27/01

2285

Re: Annie Martin V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (98-20043)

      AND NOW, this 27th day of November, 2001, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a) (1) (ii), that the claims of the plaintiff named in the Complaint in the above-captioned matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice, in their entirety.  Each party to bear its own costs.       This Stipulation is filed on behalf of the Plaintiff and all remaining Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, against whom the claims in the Complaint shall be dismissed in their entirety by the Court=s approval of this Stipulation.

11/27/01

2286

Re: Diana Larson and Larry Larson, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20138)

       COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Diana Larson and Larry Larson, wife and husband, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL...

11/27/01

2287

Re: Ann M.  Hayes and Joseph G.  Hayes, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (99-20816)

       COME NOW the above-named Plaintiffs, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

11/27/01

2288

Re: Jana Grogan and Patrick Grogan, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20132)

       COME NOW the Plaintiffs, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

11/27/01

2289

Re: Janice Dunn and Larry M.  Dunn, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation, and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20214)

       COME NOW the plaintiffs, Janice Dunn and Larry M.  Dunn, wife and husband, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company; a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

11/27/01

2290

Re: Mona Dudley and Lamont Dudley, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation, and John Does 1-50, Inclusive (00-20213)

       COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Mona Dudley and LaMont Dudley, wife and husband, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

        ORDER OF DISMISSAL

          Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

11/27/01

2291

Re: Diana Peterson and Larry Peterson, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20141)

       COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Diana Peterson and Larry Robinson, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

11/27/01

2292

Re: Valerie Y.  Petty and Ralph E.  Petty V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20166)

       COME NOW the Plaintiffs, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.  

11/27/01

2293

Re: Karen Poe and Leslie Dean Poe, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20133)

      COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Karen Poe and Leslie Dean Poe, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

        Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.



11/27/01

2294

Re: Helen Roethig and James D.  Roethig, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20150)

       COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Helen Roethig and James D.  Roethig by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of this Stipulation of the parties hereto through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

11/27/01

2295

Re: Loretta Snow V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20172)

       COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Loretta Snow, by and through her below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of this Stipulation of the parties hereto through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees..

11/27/01

2296

Re: Greta Gail Veley V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20136)

       COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Greta Gail Veley, by and through her below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorneys fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of this Stipulation of the parties hereto through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

11/27/01

2297

Re: Louise Bryan and Michael Bryan, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, a Division of American Home Products Corporation; and John Does 1-50, Inclusive (00-20215)

       COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Louise Bryan and Michael Bryan, wife and husband, by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

11/27/01

2298

Re: Sharon L.  Whitmore, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Sandra Jean Hukill, Deceased, and Donald Hukill V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20162)

      COME NOW the above-named Plaintiffs, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

        Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

11/27/01

2299

Re: Pamela J.  Brown and Gary L.  Brown, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, a Division of American Home Products Corporation; and John Does 1through 50, Inclusive (00-20170)

       COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Pamela J.  Brown and Gary L.  Brown, wife and husband, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

        ORDER OF DISMISSAL

        Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

11/29/01

2300

Re: ALL ACTIONS

(Order Authorizing AHP Settlement Trust to Enter Into Lease for Office Space at 701-739 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)

       AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2001, upon consideration of the attached form of Sublease Agreement by and between Mellon Bank, N.A. and the AHP Settlement Trust (the ALease Agreement@), and the Court having been advised that the terms of the attached form of Lease Agreement have been reviewed by the Board of Trustees appointed by this Court and its Audit, Finance, and Planning Committee, that they were negotiated at arms= length after consideration of alternatives for other office space on the terms set forth in the attached form of Lease Agreement or on terms more favorable to the Trust; it is hereby ORDERED that the Trust may enter into a lease for approximately 43,585 gross rentable square feet of office space at 701-739 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for a term of three years, with an option for a one-year extension as more fully set therein, calling for base rent of $18.00 per rentable square feet per year (i.e., payments of annual base rent of 784,530.00) on the terms that are set forth in the form of Lease Agreement that is attached hereto.                                                                BY THE COURT

11/29/01

2301

Re: Orin W.  Turner, et al.  V.  American Home Products, Inc., et al.  (99-20744)

      AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.                                                                   BY THE COURT

11/29/01

2302

Re: Jana L.  Harris V.  American Home Products, Inc., et al.  (99-20186)

      AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named defendants.                                                                       BY THE COURT

11/29/01

2303

Re: Marshall Wright, et al.  V.  American Home Products, Inc., et al.  (99-20329)

      AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named defendants.     

11/29/01

2304

Re: Diane Baker V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (99-20091)

      AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named defendants.     

11/29/01

2305

Re: Louise Harbaugh and Bert Harbaugh V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20142)

       COME NOW the above-named Plaintiffs, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

          Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

11/29/01

2306

Re: Maureen Schuster and Reinhard Schuster, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive  (00-20143)

       COME NOW the Plaintiffs, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pretrial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

         Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees

11/29/01

2307

Re: L.  Kay Mattefs and Norman Mattefs, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and John Does 1 through 50, Inclusive (00-20156)

      COME NOW the Plaintiffs, by and through their below-named attorneys of record, and Defendants, by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

       Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;        IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

11/29/01

2308

Re: Susan Dwello and Gary E.  Dwello, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; and John Does 1-50, Inclu.  (00-20168)

       COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Susan Dwello and Gary E.  Dwello, wife and husband, by and through their respective attorneys of record, and Defendants, American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories Company, a division of American Home Products Corporation; and Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., by and through their respective below-named attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Pre-Trial Order 1255, and hereby stipulate and agree to the voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action in its entirety, with prejudice, on the grounds and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

          Upon the reading and filing of the Stipulation of the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore;           IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and this does order that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, on the ground and for the reason that the same has been fully compromised and settled, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.

11/29/01

2309

Re: Sandra Adams, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-20610)

      AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2001, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a) (1) (ii), that the claims of the Plaintiffs named in the Complaint in the above-captioned matter, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, in their entirety.  Each party to bear it=s own costs.

        This Stipulation is filed on behalf of the Plaintiff of the Plaintiffs and all remaining Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, against whom the claims in the Complaint shall be dismissed in their entirety by the Court=s approval of thisStipulation.

12/07/01

2310

Re: Sheila Brown, Sharon Gaddie, Jose Gaddie, Vivian Naugle, Quentin Layer, Joan S.  Layer, Joby Jackson-Reid, Individually and all others similarly situated, V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

       This Order memorializes and approves this stipulation set forth below, which was entered into between Plaintiffs and American Home Products Corporation at a hearing held November 27, 2001. 

12/07/01

2311

Re: Richard Whatley V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-21053)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 7th day of December, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.       It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.

12/07/01

2312

Re: Chinette Cattle, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (01-20010)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 7th day of December, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby        ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

12/07/01

2313

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 7th day of December, 2001, upon consideration of the Eleventh Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (10/01/01 through 10/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $19,846.89 for the period from 10/01/01 through 10/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT

12/07/01

2314

Re: Carol Bloom, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (98-20047)

      AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2001, upon consideration of the Motion of the American Home Products Corporation Defendants to Vacate Pretrial Order No.  2260, and any response thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion be and is hereby GRANTED and Pretrial Order No.  2260 is VACATED.

       IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the claims of Plaintiff Jerrie Rawls-Toyes a plaintiff in Carol Bloom, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al., be and are hereby REINSTATED to the same extent such claims existed as of October 24, 2001, the date of Pretrial Order No.  2260.BY THE COURT

12/07/01

2315

Re: ALL ACTIONS     FILED UNDER SEAL

12/07/01

2316

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that:

      (1) the motion of defendant American Home Products Corporation (AAHP@) for an order declaring that Eva Joy Erickson is a member of the Brown class and enforcing Pretrial Order No.  1415 against her (Doc.  No.  202655) is DENIED;

      (2) the cross-motion of Eva Joy Erickson to confirm her status as a properly opted-out non-class member or alternatively, to enlarge time for her to deliver opt-out notice alternatively, to enlarge time for her to deliver opt-out notice (Doc.  No.  202681) is GRANTED;

       (3) Eva Joy Erickson has 30 days from the date of this Order to submit a proper opt-out notice to the Claims Administrator and Michael T.  Scott, Esquire, liaison counsel for AHP; and

        (4) the Special Master shall serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on counsel for Eva Joy Erickson.BY THE COURT

12/10/01

2317

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of American Home Products Corporation for civil contempt sanctions against counsel for plaintiff Suzanne Jortner (Doc.  No.  202715) is DENIED.BY THE COURT

12/10/01

2318

Re: Joanne Sampey V.  American Home Products Corp.  and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation (00-20033)

       AND NOW, TO WIT, this 10th day of December, 2001, upon notification by Defendant American Home Products Corporation that plaintiff Joanne Sampey in the above-captioned matter has failed to make case-specific expert witness disclosures in accordance with Pretrial Order No.  2191,

        IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint in the above action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.BY THE COURT       

12/12/01

2319

Re: Jessica Gowan, David Gowan V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (99-20330)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 12th day of December, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

12/19/01

2320

Re: Michelle Battaglia, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (01-20127)

      AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2001, upon consideration of the motion of Daniel E.  Becnel, Jr.  and Lynn E.  Swanson of the Law Offices of Daniel E.  Becnel, Jr. to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff (Doc.  No.  202717), it is hereby ORDERED that the withdrawal of counsel is permitted, subject to the following conditions:...

12/19/01

2321

Re: Marilyn Leinenbach, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (00-20769)

      AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2001 after written direction of counsel for plaintiffs, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to mark withdrawn the motion of plaintiffs for leave to file second amended complaint (Doc.  No.  202578).BY THE COURT

12/19/01

2322

Re: Cases listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2001, it is ORDERED that Decision and Recommendation No.  90 of the Special Discovery Master (as to Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Various Defendants) is AFFIRMED.

      It is FURTHER ORDERED that:

      (1) Defendants listed on Exhibit A are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE from

           the specified cases; and

      (2) Plaintiffs= cases listed on Exhibit A shall be marked Aclosed@ by the Clerk of Court.BY THE COURT

12/19/01

2323

Re: Norman LaRue, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (01-20109)

      AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that:

      (1) the unopposed motion of plaintiffs to amend complaint (Doc.  No.  202709) is GRANTED;

      (2) plaintiffs shall file and serve their amended complaint within 10 business days of the date of this order.BY THE COURT

12/19/01

2324

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of the Plaintiffs= Management Committee for modification of Pretrial Order No. 2152 (Doc.  No.  202690) is DENIED without prejudice.BY THE COURT

12/20/01

2325

Re: Judith Griffith V.  American Home Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products, a Delaware corporation, and A.H. Robins, Inc., a Delaware corporation (00-20090)

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 20th day of December, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action have been resolved and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is       ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

12/21/01

2326

Re: Deborah A.  Miller V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-20085)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 21st day of December, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

12/21/01

2327

Re: James McLaughlin, Sandra Plummer-McLaughlin V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-21022)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 21st day of December, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

12/21/01

2328

Re: Dawn E.  Suoto-Coons, Steven Coons V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-20886)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 21st day of December, 2001, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

12/21/01

2329

Re: Carol Bloom and Jerrie Rawls Toyes V.  American Home Products Corp.; Wyeth-Ayerst Labs.  Co.; A.H. Robins Co., Inc.; Medeva Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Fisons Pharmaceuticals; SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals (98-20047)

                STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

       On December 13, 2001, the plaintiffs served their Motion for Class Certification (APlaintiffs= Motion@).  Under local rule 7.1 (c), the defendants= response to the Plaintiffs= Motion is due on December 30, 2001.  It is hereby agreed by and between undersigned counsel that the defendants shall have until January 18, 2002 to respond to the Plaintiffs= Motion and the plaintiffs shall have until February 8, 2002 to reply to the defendants= response.APPROVED

12/21/01

2330

Re: Melody B.  Davoust and Leslie Massaro V.  Wyest-Ayerst Laboratories Company Division of American Home Products Corporation; Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Gate Pharmaceuticals, A Division of Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc.; SmithKline Beecham Corporation; Abana Pharmaceuticals Company, Inc.; Ion Laboratories, Inc.; Medeva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated (98-20558)       AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2000, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED that all of LESLIE MASSARO=S claims in the Complaint in the above-captioned matter are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(ii), in favor of all named defendants with all parties to bear their own costs and counsel fees, and without the need for plaintiff to provide class action notice to the putative class alleged in the Complaint, as all class allegations have been stricken from the Complaint under PTO 450.  This Stipulation is being submitted on behalf of LESLIE MASSARO and WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES COMPANY, DIVISION OF AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION; INTERNEURON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; GATE PHARMACEUTICALS, A DIVISION OF TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, USA, INC.; SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION; ABANA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; RICHWOOD PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC.; ION LABORATORIES, INC.; MEDEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; and A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED named in the Complaint and on behalf of LESLIE MASSARO...

12/21/01

2331

Re: ALL ACTIONS       FILED UNDER SEAL

12/27/01

2332

Re: Marie Herbert, et al.  V.  American Home Products, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (99-20098)

      AND NOW TO WIT, this 27th day of December, 2001, upon Notification by Defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division, and Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  that Plaintiff Valenessa Roberson in the above-captioned matter has failed to make case-specific expert disclosures in accordance with Pretrial Order No.  2202.      IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint of Plaintiff Valenessa Roberson against Defendants in the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to Defendants.

12/27/01

2333

Re: Sherrie Smith, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-20343)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 27th day of December, 2001, upon consideration of the motion of J.  David Duffus, Jr., Esquire and the law firm of Duffus & Melvin, P.A. (formerly Duffus, Younce, Melvin, & Vtipili, Esq.)  To withdraw as counsel for all Plaintiffs named in the foregoing Civil Actions, IT IS ORDERED that withdrawal of counsel is permitted, subject to the following conditions:

1/04/02

2334

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the next status conference will be held on January 30, 2002 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 16-A, 16th Floor, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.BY THE COURT

1/04/02

2335

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 4th day of January, 2002, upon consideration of the Twenty-First Application by Escrow Agent for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (11/01/01 through 11/30/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Escrow Agent for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $1,768.37 for the period from 11/1/01 through 11/30/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT

1/04/02

2336

Re: ALL ACTIONS       FILED UNDER SEAL...

1/04/02

2337

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2002, the court having decided that it is necessary to establish a process, such as the one contained in the attached proposed Pretrial Order, for resolving motions to enforce Pretrial Order No.  1415 against Class Members who assert claims allegedly based on Primary Pulmonary Hypertension, it is hereby ORDERED that:

       (1) any objections to said proposed Pretrial Order shall be filed with the court on or before January 18, 2002; and

       (2) argument on objections shall be held at the MDL 1203 Status Conference scheduled for January 30, 2002 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 16-A, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

BY THE COURTAttachments on Order

1/10/02

2338

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of Les Laboratories Servier for expedited consideration of its motion to enforce Pretrial Order No.  27 against Thomas Smith, Esquire (Doc.  No.  202725) is DENIED as moot.BY THE COURT

1/14/02

2339

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 14th day of January, 2002, upon consideration of the Twelfth Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim

Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (11/01/01 through 11/30/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $21,293.99 for the period from 11/01/01 through 11/30/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT

1/14/02

2340

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 14th day of January, 2002, upon consideration of the Forty-Fourth Application by Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (11/01/01 through 11/30/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $33,229.97 for the period from 11/1/01 through 11/30/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT

1/14/02

2341

Re: Jabie Abercrombie, et al.  V.  Advanced Medical Weight Loss Center, Inc., et al.  (01-20102)

      AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs= motion for leave to file supplemental memorandum (Doc.  No.  202758) is GRANTED.BY THE COURT

1/15/02

2342

Re: Rebecca Adcock; Michael Battaglia; Margaret Broussard; Cleo Cage; Sharon Fountain Pellegrini; Shirley Gremillion; Earline Harris; Linda Morales; Rhonda Pritchett; Mercedes Reinerth; and Agatha Townsend V.  American Home Products Corporation; A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated; and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company (01-20127)       AND NOW, TO WIT, upon consideration of the motion of the Law Offices of Daniel E.  Becnel, Jr.  for Additional Time for Mr.  Battaglia to Produce Counsel, IT IS ORDERED that Mr.  Battaglia has until February 8 2002 to retain another attorney in this matter, and that the release of the Law Offices of Daniel E.  Becnel, Jr.  from further responsibility in Mr.  Battaglia=s case will also be effective as of February 8, 2002.



1/15/02

2343

Re: Sheila Brown, Sharon Gaddie, Jose Gaddie, Vivian Naugle, Quentin Layer, John S. Layer, Joby Jackson-Reid, and Harvey E.  Reid, Individually and all other similarly situated, V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

       AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2002, upon consideration of American Home Products Corporation=s Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to CIGNA Healthcare=s Second Motion to Intervene, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and that American Home Products Corporation should respond to CIGNA Healthcare=s Second Motion to Intervene on or before January 17, 2002.BY THE COURT

1/15/02

2344

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2002, this court having received and reviewed  the attached proposed AHP Settlement Trust Policies and Procedures for Audit and Disposition of Matrix Compensation Claims in Audit (AAudit Rules@), it is hereby ORDERED that:

       (1) any objections to said proposed Audit Rules shall be filed with the court on or before January 25, 2002; and

       (2) argument on objections shall be held at the MDL 1203 Status Conference scheduled for January 30, 2002, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 16-A, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106

BY THE COURTAttachment on Order

1/16/02

2345

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      AND NOW, this 16th day of January, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of plaintiffs Charles and Erma Booker for leave to opt out is DENIED.BY THE COURT

1/16/02

2346

Re: Dorothy L.  Harris, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Devlin Rene Richardson V.  American Home Products Corporation and its subsidiary Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., a foreign corporation; A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a foreign corporation; Gate Pharmaceuticals, a division of Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc., a foreign corporation; and Multicare Health System d/b/a Multicare Internal Medicine, a Washington corporation (00-20948)

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

       STIPULATION

       IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by counsel for the parties hereto that all claims in this action shall be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

        ORDER        Based on the above stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

1/18/02

2347

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      AND NOW, this 18th day of January, 2002, upon consideration of the motion of American Home Products Corporation (AAHP@) to enforce Pretrial Order No.  1415 against certain class members who continue to assert settled claims, the response filed by Joseph and Betty Bullock, and all other related documents, it is hereby ORDERED that:  

       (1) the motion is GRANTED;

       (2) Joseph and Betty Bullock are enjoined from prosecuting the action Bullock v.  American Home Products Corp., No.  2001 31288 CICI, in the Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit, Volusia County, Florida;

       (3) within 14 days of the date of this Order, Joseph and Betty Bullock and their counsel are to take all necessary and appropriate steps to effect the dismissal with prejudice of the foregoing action against AHP and its affiliates, including Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, and against any other Released Party as defined in the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement, including Eckerd Corporation of Florida, Inc.; and

        (4) the Special Master shall serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on counsel for Joseph and Betty Bullock by overnight mail.

BY THE COURTMemorandum attached to Order

1/18/02

2348

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      AND NOW, this 18th day of January, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of Cigna Healthcare for leave to file class member data under seal (Doc.  No.  202750) is GRANTED.BY THE COURT

1/23/02

2349

Re: All cases listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW TO WIT, this 23rd day of January, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit attached to Order

1/23/02

2350

Re: Bloom, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (98-20047)

      It is hereby agreed by and between undersigned counsel that defendants Fisons Corporation and Medeva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  has an extension of time to respond to plaintiff=s Motion for Class Certification from January 18, 2002 until January 22, 2002.  Plaintiff may file a reply to defendants= response on or before February 11, 2002.APPROVED

1/23/02

2351

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      Protective Order Concerning Confidential Information of the AHP Settlement Trust

       The matter is before the Court pursuant to its continuing exclusive jurisdiction to implement the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement in this action, dated November 18, 1999 (as amended on November 24, 1999, January 10, 2000, March 24, 2000, and July 20, 2000) (the ASettlement Agreement@), as retained in Section VIII.B.1 of the Settlement Agreement and Paragraph 11 of this Court=s Pretrial Order No.  1415 approving the Settlement Agreement, entered on August 28, 2000.  Upon the consent of the parties and finding good cause to do so, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED as follows:

1/23/02

2352

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that a hearing on the Motion of the Plaintiffs= Management Committee and Class Counsel for Entry of a Rule to Show Cause Why Ronald R.  Benjamin, Esquire, Should not be held in Contempt of Court and Why and Appropriate Sanction Should Not be Imposed Against Him (Doc.  No.  202738) will be held on February 15, 2002 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 16-A, 16th Floor, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.BY THE COURT

1/28/02

2353

Re: EXHIBITS A-H ON DECISION & RECOMMENDATION NO.  91

      AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that Decision and Recommendation No.  91 of the Special Discovery Master (as to Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice of Various Defendants) is AFFIRMED.

       It is FURTHER ORDERED that:

       (1) Plaintiffs listed on Exhibit A shall file conforming captions with the Court              within thirty (30) days.

       (2) Defendants listed on Exhibit A are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from the               cases listed on Exhibits B through H of Decision and Recommendation No.  91.BY THE COURT

1/28/02

2354

Re: ALL ACTIONS     FILED UNDER SEAL...

1/28/02

2355

Re: Sheila Brown , et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      (Order Approving Official Notice of Final Judicial Approval)

      Pursuant to this court=s exclusive and continuing jurisdiction to implement the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement With American Home Products Corporation (ASettlement Agreement@), as retained in Section VIII.B.1 of the Settlement Agreement and Paragraph 11 of Pretrial Order No.  1415, Class Counsel and American Home Products Corporation have submitted to the court a proposed Official Notice and related materials (collectively referred to as the ANotice Packet@) to be mailed to Class Members on the Notice List under Section VI.B.3 of the Settlement Agreement.  The purpose of the proposed Official Notice is to advise Class Members that Final Judicial Approval has occurred and of other matters under the Settlement Agreement affected by such Final Judicial Approval.  The parties= submission includes:       (1) the Official Notice;...

1/28/02

2356

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2002, IT IS ORDERED that the rolling deadlines applicable to discovery for all MDL 1203 actions with Discovery Initiation Dates of May 1, 2001 through December 1, 2002 are reflected in the attached chart and are incorporated herein.

BY THE COURTChart attached to Order

1/29/02

2357

Re: Darlene M.  Broussard, et al.  V.  Gate Pharmaceuticals, et al.  (99-20153)

      AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant Shire Richwood (a.k.a. Richwood Pharmaceuticals Company, Inc.)  incorrectly captioned on the docket as Richmond Pharmaceuticals was terminated by Pretrial Order No.  1215 on March 24, 2000.BY THE COURT

1/29/02

2358

Re: Jabie Abercrombie, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (01-20102)

      AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2002, upon consideration of Plaintiffs= AUnopposed@ Motion to Modify Pretrial Order No.  2047, the Opposition by Defendant American Home Products Corporation to Plaintiffs= AUnopposed@ Motion to Modify Pretrial Order No.  2047, and the Joint Motion of Non-Settled Plaintiffs and American Home Products Corporation to Modify Pretrial Order No.  2047 and to Reinstate Claims, it is ORDERED that the Joint Motion is GRANTED and Pretrial Order No.  2047 is modified by this Pretrial Order with respect to the Jabie Abercrombie civil action by reinstating the claims of the following plaintiffs only:...

1/29/02

2359

Re: Michelle Bargiorno, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corp., et al.  (01-20065)

      AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2002, upon consideration of Plaintiffs= AUnopposed@ Motion to Modify Pretrial Order No.  2047, the Opposition by Defendant American Home Products Corporation to Plaintiffs= AUnopposed@ Motion to Modify Pretrial Order2047, and the Joint Motion of Non-Settled Plaintiffs and American Home Products Corporation to Modify Pretrial Order No.  2047 and to Reinstate Claims, it is ORDERED that the Joint Motion is GRANTED and Pretrial Order No.  2047 is modified by this Pretrial Order with respect to the Bargiorno civil action by reinstating the claims of plaintiffs Michelne Bargiorno, Jimmy Carter, Shirley Bush, and Virginia Downey only.BY THE COURT

1/29/02

2360

Re: Susan McKelvey V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (01-20064)

      AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2002, upon consideration of Plaintiffs= AUnopposed@ Motion to Modify Pretrial Order No.  2047 and the Joint Motion of Non-Settled Plaintiffs and American Home Products Corporation to Modify Pretrial Order No.  2047 and to Reinstate Claims, it is ORDERED that the Joint Motion is GRANTED and Pretrial Order No.  2047 is modified by this Pretrial Order with respect to the Susan McKelvey civil action by reinstating the claims of Plaintiff Susan McKelvey.BY THE COURT

1/31/02

2361

Re: This Memorandum of Law Applies to the Actions Listed on Exhibit A

      AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2002, it is hereby ordered that the Phentermine Defendants= Uncontested Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice Class Action Allegations and Claims of Putative Class Representatives Against Phentermine Defendants is GRANTED.  The class allegations against the Phentermine Defendants shall be dismissed without prejudice from each action listed in Exhibit A.  The claims of each named Plaintiff against the Phentermine Defendants shall be dismissed without prejudice from each action listed in Exhibit A.Exhibit A attached to Order

1/31/02

2362

Re: ALL ORDERS

      AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2002, the court having received no objections to the AHP Settlement Trust Policies and Procedures for Audit and Disposition of Matrix Compensation Claims in Audit, it is hereby ORDERED that said Policies and Procedures, attached as Exhibit A, are APPROVED.BY THE COURT                                                                        Exhibit A on Order

1/31/02

2363

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the next status conference will be held on February 27, 2002 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 16-A, 16th Floor, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.BY THE COURT

1/31/02

2364

Re: Pamela Peck V.  A.H. Robins Company Incorporated, A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of American Home Products; EON Labs Manufacturing; Rugby Laboratories, Inc.; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, a Division of American Home Products Corporation; Camall Company; Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc; Frederic Civish, MD; and Does 1 - 30 (00-20824)

       ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INC., AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION, AND WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES COMPANY WITH PREJUDICE

        Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,

        IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff=s claims against A.H. Robins Company, Inc., and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, in the above-captioned matter, be and hereby are dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys= fees.BY THE COURT

2/05/02

2365

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 5th day of February, 2002, upon consideration of the Twenty-Second Application by Escrow Agent for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (12/01/01 through 12/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Escrow Agent for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $6,602.75 for the period from 12/01/01 through 12/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the court.BY THE COURT

2/05/02

2366

Re: ALL ACTIONS                FILED UNDER SEAL...

2/06/02

2367

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2002, presently before the court is the motion of the Plaintiffs= Management Committee to clarify paragraph 2 (b) of Pretrial Order No. 27, nunc pro tunc, to allow publication and use of discovery material in diet drug litigation has produced and designated as confidential discovery material (Doc.  No.  202743).  The court held oral argument on January 30, 2002.

       On March 31, 1998 the court entered Pretrial Order No.  27 (APTO 27") to govern the use of discovery material produced and designated as confidential by a party in this litigation.  Specifically, paragraph 2 (b) of PTO 27 states:

        The parties have agreed that Discovery Material designated as confidential

         under paragraph 3 hereof will be used only for the court litigation

         relating to the health effects of the Diet Drugs (phentermine,

         Fenfluramine, and Dexfenfluramine), provided that the court and

         parties in any such state court litigation be bound with respect

         to such Discovery Material by the terms of this Order or by the terms

         of a Protective Order of comparable scope entered in such state

         court litigation.

By its explicit terms, PTO 27 limits the use of discovery material designated as confidential to this multi-district litigation and any state court litigation where the parties agree to be bound by PTO 27.  It thus prohibits production in the Canadian courts or to courts of any other country...

2/12/02

2368

Re: Richard J.  Black, Jr.  and Rebecca L.  Black V.  American Home Prod.  (00-21065)      AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2002, upon consideration of Plaintiff=s Motion for Enlargement of Time and American Home Products Corporation=s response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a response, if at all, to American Home Products Corporation=s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.  R.  Civ.  P.  41 (b) and 16 (f) no later than February 25, 2002.  Plaintiffs shall further serve a copy of the same, along with any supporting exhibits or other documentation, upon counsel for American Home Products Corporation by facsimile transmission no later than February 25, 2002.

2/15/02

2369

Re: Linda Burns V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (99-20333)

      AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2002, upon consideration of Defendants= Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Compel Compliance with

Subpoena Duces Tecum, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED.

       IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Reply Brief attached as Exhibit 1 to the Motion shall be deemed filed in this action as of the date of this Pretrial Order.BY THE COURT

2/15/02

2370

Re: Bloom, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (98-20047)

      It is hereby agreed by and between undersigned counsel that Plaintiff Carol Bloom has an extension of time to file her Reply to her Motion for Class Certification from February 11, 2002 until February 19, 2002.APPROVED

2/15/02

2371

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of the Plaintiffs= Management Committee and Class Counsel for a Rule to Show Cause why Ronald Benjamin, Esquire should not be held in contempt of court and why an appropriate sanction should not be imposed against him (Doc.  No.  202738) is DENIED without prejudiceBY THE COURT

2/19/02

2372

Re: Robert Dryer V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-21005)

      AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of American Home Products Corporation to dismiss for failure to serve case-specific expert reports (Doc.  No.  202756) is GRANTED as unopposed.BY THE COURT

2/20/02

2373

Re: Kathy Kresser V.  A.H. Robins Company Incorporated, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of American Home Products; Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, a Division of American Home Products (00-20825)

       Based upon the stipulations of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore,

       IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs= claims against A.H. Robins Company Incorporated; American Home Products Company; and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, a Division of American Home Products Corporation, be and are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorney=s fees.

BY THE COURTAttachment on Order

2/20/02

2374

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 20th day of February, 2002, upon consideration of the Thirteenth Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (12/01/01 through 12/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $23,287.30 for the period from 12/01/01 through 12/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT

2/20/02

2375

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 20th day of February, 2002, upon consideration of the Forty-Fifth Application by Special Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (12/01/01 through 12/31/01), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $26,058.78 for the period from 12/1/01 through 12/31/01, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT

2/20/02

2376

Re: Broussard, Glaze, Chaney, Boxie, Hill, Litchfield, Powell, Reynolds, Dial, Veron, Wilkinson, Wrinkle, et al.  V.  Gate, AHP, Wyeth-Ayerst, and A.H. Robins (different case numbers for each plaintiff/defendant - see Order)

      AND NOW this 20th day of February, 2002, presently before the court is the Fleming Plaintiffs= Second Motion for Exemption from the Plaintiffs= Management Committee=s Common Fund Fee and Expenses (Doc. # 202799).

       In Pretrial Order Nos.  467 and 517 the court provided for sequestration of 9% of any plaintiff=s attorney=s fee in the MDL 1203 to be set aside into a fund (Acommon benefit assessment@) for the ultimate payment of fees to the Plaintiffs= Management Committee (APMC@).

        In Pretrial Order No.  1492 the court set forth in detail numerous reasons justifying the imposition of the common benefit assessment and denied certain plaintiffs= request for exemption from it.        In Pretrial Order No.  2030 the court refused the Fleming Plaintiffs= request to amend Pretrial Order No.  1957 to include a declaration by the court that the order Ainvolved a controlling question of law as to which there exists substantial ground for difference of opinion, and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate terminations of the litigation.@  The court also stated...

2/22/02

2377

Re: Timothy Henneberry V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (01-20022)

      AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of plaintiff to extend discovery deadlines (Doc. # 202485) is DENIED as moot.BY THE COURT

2/22/02

2378

Re: Carolyn Patterson V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al. (00-20981)

      AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of defendant American Home Products Corporation to compel plaintiff=s expert to produce documents underlying his opinions (Doc.  No.  202660) is DENIED as moot.BY THE COURT

2/25/02

2379

Re: Debbie Olinger as Administratrix of the Estate of Doris Waddle V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (98-20518)       AND NOW, TO WIT: This 25th day of February, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above styled cause have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is ORDERED, that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

2/26/02

2380

Re: ALL ACTIONS                  FILED UNDER SEAL

2/26/02

2381

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      This Order will govern the resolution of all remaining discovery issues in MDL 1203 cases in which American Home Products (AAHP@) remains an active defendant, and with Discovery Initiation Dates (ADIDs@) up to and including November 1, 1999 (hereafter referred to as ACategory One@).

       Pursuant to Pretrial Order Nos.  417 and 1467, and any amendments thereto, the parties are required to complete fact and expert discovery in accordance with the deadlines established by the Court.  All of the discovery deadlines for cases in Category One have expired.

        The Special Discovery Master has informed the Court that there are numerous cases in Category One that should either be marked Aclosed@ on the docket or remanded to the appropriate transferor courts.  Further, the Special Discovery Master has reported to the court that the parties have reviewed all Category One cases and have determined that the Plaintiffs whose cases are listed in Exhibit A to this Order have not settled or dismissed their claims.

        To assess the status of discovery in the cases identified in Exhibit A, it is hereby ordered that the relevant parties shall:...

2/26/02

2382

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 26th day of February, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the action listed on Exhibit A hereto is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order

2/26/02

2383

Re: Sheila Brown, Sharon Gaddie, Jose Gaddie, Vivian Naugle, Quentin Layer, Joan S. Layer, Joby Jackson-Reid, and Harvey E.  Reid, Individually and all others similarly situated V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING MOTIONS TO ENFORCE PARAGRAPH 7 OF PRETRIAL ORDER NO 1415 AGAINST CLASS MEMBERS WHO ASSERT CLAIMS ALLEGEDLY BASED ON PPH

RECITALS...

2/28/02

2384

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that:

      (1) a hearing on the Petition of the AHP Settlement Trust for Issuance of a Rule to Show Cause why the Utah Heart Clinic Should Not be Compelled to Produce Medical Records in Accordance with the Court=s Pretrial Order No.  1665 (Doc.  No.  202770) will be held on March 20, 2002 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 16-A, 16th Floor, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106; and

       (2) the next status conference will be held on April 24, 2002 at 2:00 p.m. at the same place.BY THE COURT

3/01/02

2385

Re: ALL CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 1st day of March, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the action listed on Exhibit A hereto is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.Exhibit A attached to Order.

3/04/02

2386

: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      (Order Approving Fund A Legal Fee Escrow Account Agreement)

      Pursuant to this court=s exclusive and continuing jurisdiction to implement the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with American Home Products Corporation (ASettlement Agreement@), as retained in Section VIII.B.1 of the Settlement Agreement and Paragraph 11 of Pretrial Order No.  1415, Class Counsel, and American Home Products Corporation have submitted to the court a proposed Fund A Legal Fee Escrow Account Agreement for the Court=s review and approval pursuant to Section III.B.3 and Section VIII.E.1 of the Settlement Agreement.  The purpose of the Fund A Legal Fee Escrow Account is to provide for compensation to Plaintiffs= Counsel and incentive awards to Class Representatives in certain class actions in accordance with Section III.B.3 and Section VIII.E.1 of the Settlement Agreement.

        AND NOW, this 4th day of March, 2002, this court having reviewed the proposed Fund A Legal Fee Escrow Account Agreement and concluding that it complies with the provisions of Section III.B.3 of the Settlement Agreement, it is hereby ORDERED that the Fund A Legal Fee Escrow Account Agreement is approved.

BY THE COURTAgreement and Exhibit attached to Order

3/04/02

2387

Re: ALL ACTIONS

(Procedure for Award of Counsel Fees and Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses)

      AND NOW, this 4th day of March, 2002, in order to provide for the orderly and efficient presentation and determination of requests for the award of attorneys= fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses from: (1) the MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account established and maintained pursuant to Pretrial Order Nos.  467 and 517; and (2) the funds available for an award of counsel fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with American Home Products Corporation (the ASettlement Agreement@), which was approved by this Court in Pretrial Order No.  1415 (collectively the ADiet Drug Common Benefit Fee Sources@), and in order to clarify any potential ambiguities in Pretrial Order No.  2023 and to incorporate the deadlines set forth in Pretrial Order No.  2224, it is hereby

        ORDERED, ADJUSTED, AND DECREED that:        1.  Pretrial Order No.  2224 is hereby vacated and superceded by the terms of this Order.  ...

3/05/02

2388

Re: Janelle Swanda and Leroy Swanda, Wife and Husband V.  American Home Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products, a Delaware Corporation, A.H. Robins, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Does Nos.  4-6, Real Name Unknown, and John Doe Corporation A, Real Name Unknown (00-20738)

       AND NOW, TO WIT: This 5th day of March, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been resolved and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

        ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.Exhibit A attached to Order

3/05/02

2389

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 5th day of March, 2002, upon consideration of the Twenty-Third Application by Escrow Agent for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (01/01/02 through 01/31/02), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Escrow Agent for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $2,172.86 for the period from 01/01/02 through 01/31/02, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT

3/05/02

2390

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 5th day of March, 2002, upon consideration of the Fourteenth Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (01/01/02 through 01/31/02), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $61,206.98 for the period from 01/01/02 through 01/31/02, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT

3/05/02

2391

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 5th day of March, 2002, upon consideration of the Forty-Sixth Application by Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (01/01/02 through 01/31/02), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $20,114.57 for the period from 01/01/02 through 01/31/02, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT



3/05/02

2392

Re: ALL ACTIONS           UNDER SEAL

3/19/02

2393

Re: Richard J.  Black and Rebecca L.  Black V.  AHP Corporation (00-21065)

      AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2002, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 41 (a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.

       Notwithstanding the foregoing, Plaintiffs shall be permitted to apply for and to receive any benefits to which the Plaintiffs may be entitled pursuant to the terms of the Accelerated Implementation Option (AAIO@) offered under the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with American Home Products Corporation (the ASettlement Agreement@).  Plaintiffs shall have no right to opt out of the Settlement Agreement or to file any claim or action against AHP or any other Released Party, as that term is defined in the Settlement Agreement.

       This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiffs and the only named Defendant in this action, American Home Products Corporation.APPROVED AND SO ORDERED

3/20/02

2394

Re: ALL ACTIONS                 UNDER SEAL

3/20/02

2395

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      Based upon the AHP Settlement Trust=s withdrawal of its subpoena to the Utah Heart Clinic, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the AHP Settlement Trust=s Petition for Issuance of a Rule to Show Cause Why the Utah Heart Clinic Should Not Be Compelled to Produce Medical Records in Accordance with this Court=s Pretrial Order No.  1665 (Doc.  No.  202770) is DISMISSED AS MOOT.BY THE COURT

4/01/02

2396

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the Plaintiffs= Management Committee in MDL 1203, Class Counsel in Brown v.  American Home Products Corporation, Civil Action No.  99-20593, and Napoli, Kaiser, Bern, & Associates, LLP (hereinafter ANKB@) that the individual Petition for an Award of Attorneys= Fees submitted by NKB pursuant to the provisions of Pretrial Order No.  2224 and filed of record with the Court on Friday, March 8, 2002 is hereby withdrawn, with prejudice.

      IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the individual Petition of NKB for an Award of Attorneys= fees shall be deemed not to have been filed of record with the Court for any purpose, including Fed.R.Civ.P.11.APPROVED AND SO ORDERED

4/01/02

2397

Re: Linda Burns V.  American Home Products, et al.  (99-20333)      The Motion of plaintiff, LINDA BURNS in the above-entitled action for leave to file Third Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 15, Federal Rules Civil Procedure, in the above case is hereby granted and that the Third Amended Complaint is deemed filed

4/02/02

2398

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      AND NOW, this 2nd day of April, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition of plaintiffs Ruth McCaw and James McCaw for supervisory order and clarification (Doc. No.  202778) is DENIED.BY THE COURT

4/03/02

2399

Re: Gwen Brookshire V.  Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation, American Home Products Corporation, A.H. Robins Company, Inc., and Dr.  V.N. Higorani (00-21048)

       AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2002, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUSTED, and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a) (1) (ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice as to all named Defendants, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.

         Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Plaintiff shall be permitted to institute a claim or action only to the extent permitted by the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with American Home Products Corporation (the ASettlement Agreement@).         In the event that Plaintiff re-files any claim or action against American Home ...

4/03/02

2400

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

       AND NOW, TO WIT, this 3rd day of April, 2002, the Court issues the following Order:..

4/03/02

2401

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      (Modifying a Limit on Fees for Retrieval and Copying of Medical Records)

      AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2002, upon motion of the AHP Settlement Trust (Athe Trust@), the Court having found that:

4/03/02

2402

Re: ALL ACTIONS      AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2002, upon consideration of the attached form of Agreement for Customer Call Services between the AHP Settlement Trust (the ATrust@) and Product Development Corporation and Procall Solutions, Inc., and the Court having been advised that the terms of the attached form of Agreement for Customer Call Services have been reviewed by the Board of Trustees appointed by this Court; that they were negotiated at arms= length on the basis of the Trust=s own experience with a different supplier of customer call services and after consideration of alternatives, including engaging others to perform the services and including having the Trust perform the activities envisioned with its own personnel; that the Board of Trustees of the Trust has resolved to enter into the Agreement for Customer Call Services with the parties identified and on the terms set forth in the attached form of Agreement; that the attached form of Agreement for customer Call Services has been reviewed by Liaison Counsel for the Parties pursuant to Section 10.03 of the Settlement Trust Agreement; that Liaison Counsel has stated no objections to the form of Agreement provides that the Board of Trustees must obtain the approval of the Court before incurring any obligation of the magnitude and duration that would be incurred pursuant to the form of Agreement for Customer Call Services attached hereto; and that the form of Agreement for...

4/04/02

2403

Re: Ann El Martin (aka Martin-Outlaw)V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al. (00-20644)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 4th day of April, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants and of the entire action, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.        It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case can be marked closed.

4/10/02

2404

Re: David P.  Horan V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-21038)

      AND NOW TO WIT: This 10th day of April, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1 (b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby       ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

4/09/02

2405

Re: ALL ACTIONS             UNDER SEAL

4/11/02

2406

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2002, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the second motion of CIGNA Healthcare to intervene (Doc.  No.  202749) is DENIED.

BY THE COURTMemorandum attached to Order

4/11/02

2407

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2002, upon consideration of the attached form of First Amendment to Sublease by and between Mellon Bank, N.A. and the AHP Settlement Trust (the AAmendment to Lease Agreement@), and the Court having been advised that the terms of the attached form of Amendment to Lease Agreement have been reviewed by the Board of Trustees appointed by this Court; that the terms were negotiated at arms= length; that the Board of Trustees of the AHP Settlement Trust has resolved to enter into an agreement on the terms set forth in the attached form of Amendment to Lease Agreement; and that the Parties to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with American Home Products Corporation dated November 12, 1999, as amended, have reviewed the terms thereof and have no objection; it is hereby ORDERED THAT THE Trust may enter into the First Amendment to Sublease Agreement with Mellon Bank, N.A. relating to 3,887 square feet of rentable space ath 701-739 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on the terms set forth in the attached form of Amendment to Sublease Agreement.

BY THE COURTAttachments attached to Order

4/11/02

2408

Re: Patricia J.  Parker V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated (00-20234)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 11th day of April, 2002, plaintiff and defendants, having stipulated for the dismissal of plaintiff Patricia J.  Parker=s claims against defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 (a) (1) (ii), the Court approves such stipulation and plaintiff Patricia J.  Parker=s claims against defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, are dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs.BY THE COURT

4/12/02

2409

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2002, the court hereby refers to the attached motion filed by Paul Evans on behalf of Claimant Geany Evans, Claim Number 183/00 2855 849, to the Special Master to the Trust for a report and recommendation on the issues raised therein.

       Accordingly, the AHP Settlement Trust shall file with the court and serve upon the Special Master and Mr.  Evans a written response to the motion within fourteen (14) days of this Order.

        Mr.  Evans shall have seven (7) days after the receipt of the response to file a reply with the court.  If Mr.  Evans files a reply, he must serve copies upon the Special Master and the Trust Counsel.

         After receipt of the reply, if any, and prior to issuing his report and recommendation, the Special Master shall conduct a telephonic hearing on this matter.

BY THE COURTAttachments attached to Order

4/16/02

2410

Re: ALL ACTIONS               UNDER SEAL

4/18/02

2411

Re: Sharon Boxie, et al.  V.  American Home Products, et al.  (99-20108)

      Considering the foregoing motion;

      IT IS ORDERED, ADJUSTED, AND DECREED that all claims of Alton Richard and Bernita Tramonte, asserted in their Complaint against defendants, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company and American Home Products Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice.  Each party will bear its own court costs.      Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, this 18th day of April, 2002.

4/18/02

2412

Re: Sharon Matherne V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al (99-20399)

      Considering the foregoing motion;

      IT IS ORDERED, ADJUSTED, AND DECREED that all claims of Sharon Matherne, asserted in here Complaint against defendants, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and American Home Products Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice.  Each party will bear its own court costs.       Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, this 18th day of April, 2002.

4/18/02

2413

Re: Alton Richard V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (99-20282)

      Considering the foregoing motion;

      IT IS ORDERED, ADJUSTED, AND DECREED that all claims of Alton Richard, asserted in his Complaint against defendants, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and American Home Products Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice.  Each party will bear its own court costs.       Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, this 18th day of April, 2002.

4/18/02

2414

Re: Barbara Phillips V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (99-20398)

      Considering the foregoing motion;

      IT IS ORDERED, ADJUSTED, AND DECREED that all claims of Barbara Phillips, asserted in here Complaint against defendants, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, and American Home Products Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice.  Each party will bear its own court costs.      Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, this 18th day of April, 2002.

4/18/02

2415

Re: Bloom, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (98-20047)

      Upon consideration of the Motion to Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion for Class Certification, it is this 18th day of April, 2002, hereby       ORDERED, that Plaintiffs= Motion is GRANTED.

4/18/02

2416

Re: Dave Paulson V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company; Wyeth Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corporation; Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.; Does 1 through X, inclusive; and Roe Corporations I through X, inclusive (99-20735)

       The parties, by and through their undersigned attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree to dismiss this matter without prejudice in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania due to the fact that a stipulation was filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania due to the fact that a stipulation was filed in the United States District Court of Nevada and was not ruled upon until the matter was transferred to the MDL.

        IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED to that this matter be dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Fed.  R.  Civ.  Pro.  41 (b) (1), each party to bear its own costs and attorney=s fees.

        IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED to by the parties, that if Plaintiff ever reinstates a lawsuit(s) against Defendants based on any alleged damages caused by Phentermine, FenFluramine, or Dexfenfluramine, such action(s) shall be filed in Federal Court.

        DATED this 3rd day of April, 2002.

ORDER...

4/18/02

2417

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 18th day of April, 2002, upon consideration of the Forty-Seventh Application by Special Discovery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (02/01/02 through 02/28/02), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $38,056.27 for the period from 02/01/02 through 02/28/02, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT

4/18/02

2418

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 18th day of April, 2002, upon consideration of the Fifteenth Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (02/01/02 through 02/28/02), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of $37,298.62 for the period from 02/01/02 through 02/28/02, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.BY THE COURT

4/18/02

2419

Re: Sandra Kutz V.  American Home Products Corporation; and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated (99-20326)

       AND NOW, TO WIT this 18th day of April, 2002, plaintiff and defendants, having stipulated for the dismissal of plaintiff Sandra Kutz=s claims against defendants American Home Products Corporation, and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.  R.  Civ.  P.  41 (a) (1) (ii), the Court approves such stipulation and plaintiff Sandra Kutz=s claims against defendants American Home Products Corporation, and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs.

BY THE COURT

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

        Pursuant to Rule 21 (a) (1) (ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby stipulated between all parties hereto, by and through their undersigned counsel, that plaintiff Sandra Kutz=s Petition is dismissed, with prejudice, as to defendants American Home Products Corporation, and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, with each party to pay their own costs.        DATED this 5th day of April, 2002

4/22/02

2420

Re: Cases Listed On Exhibit A

       This Order will govern the resolution of all remaining discovery issues in MDL 1203 cases in which American Home Products (AAHP@) remains as an active defendant, and with Discovery Initiation Dates (ADIDs@) of December 1, 1999 through December 1, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ACategory Two@)....

4/24/02

2421

Re: June Rose Lamb, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (01-20113)

      AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that said motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute of defendant American Home Products Corporation (Doc. No.  202830) is DENIED with leave to renew in 60 days.BY THE COURT

4/24/02

2422

Re: HMO Louisiana, Inc.  on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (00-20242)

      Considering the foregoing Motion to Withdraw Funds from the Registry of the Court;

      IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUSTED, AND DECREED, that the Clerk of Court pay unto Gauthier, Downing, LaBarre, Beiser, & Dean the amount of $43,000.00, plus accrued interests on the amount shown on the books of the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, as distribution of the amount deposited into the registry of the court on May 18, 2001, per Pre-Trial Order No.  1876 dated April 6, 2001.      Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, this 24th day of April, 2002

4/24/02

2423

Re: Sheila Brown, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation (99-20593)

      (Order Approving Fund B Legal Fee Escrow Account Agreement)

      Pursuant to this Court=s exclusive and continuing jurisdiction to implement the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with American Home Products Corporation (ASettlement Agreement@), as retained in Section VIII.B.1 of the Settlement Agreement and Paragraph 11 of Pretrial Order No.  1415, Class Counsel and Wyeth (formerly American Home Products Corporation) have submitted to the Court a proposed Fund B Legal Fee Escrow Account Agreement for the Court=s review and approval pursuant to Section VIII.E.1.b of the Settlement Agreement.  The purpose of the Fund B Legal Fee Escrow Account is to provide a source from which the Court can award compensation to Plaintiffs= Counsel in accordance with Section VIII.E.1.b of the Settlement Agreement.

        AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2002, this Court having reviewed the proposed Fund B Legal Fee Escrow Account Agreement and concluding that it complies with the provisions of Section VIII.E.1.b of the Settlement Agreement, it is hereby ORDERED that the Fund B Legal Fee Escrow Account Agreement is approved.BY THE COURT

4/24/02

2424

Re: Martin Moss, et al.  V.  American Home Products Corporation, et al.  (02-20110)

STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES FOR LEAVE TO PLEAD

      We, the attorneys for the respective parties, do hereby stipulate that the Defendant, Interneuron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., be granted leave to answer, move, or otherwise plead to Plaintiff=s Complaint on or before May 15, 2002 and that the court may enter an order accordingly, notice by the clerk being hereby waived.IT IS SO ORDERED

4/29/02

2425

Re: Jennifer L.  Vernon V.  American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated (00-20113)

      AND NOW, TO WIT, this 29th day of April, 2002, plaintiff and defendants, having stipulated for the dismissal of plaintiff Jennifer L.  Vernon=s claims against defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 (a) (1) (ii), the Court approves such stipulation and plaintiff Jennifer L.  Vernon=s claims against defendants American Home Products Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, and A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, are dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs.

BY THE COURTStipulation of Dismissal attached to Order

4/29/02

2426

Re: Mirianne and Aaron Rasmussen, her husband V.  American Home Products Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; One unidentified sales representative of American Home Products, individually; EON Labs Manufacturing, Inc., a Delaware corporation; and Goldline Laboratories, Inc., a Florida corporation (02-20027)

        Plaintiffs, Marianne Rasmussen and Aaron Rasmussen, her husband, are class members; bound by the Judgement in MDL 1203 and are entitled to benefits thereunder, therefore, it is stipulated and agreed by undersigned counsel that this lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, each party to bear their own costs.APPROVED

4/29/02

2427

Re: Marie and Eric Salley, her husband v.  American Home Products Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; One unidentified sales representative of American Home Products, individually; EON Labs Manufacturing, Inc., a Delaware corporation; and Goldline Laboratories, Inc., a Florida corporation (02-20055)

       Plaintiffs, Marie and Eric Salley, her husband, are class members bound by the Judgement in MDL case 1203 and are entitled to benefits thereunder, therefore, it is stipulated and agreed by undersigned counsel that this lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice as to all named defendants, each party to bear their own costs.APPROVED

4/29/02

2428

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of the Pattison Objectors to compel service of court orders and other papers (Doc.  No.  202752) is DENIED without prejudice.BY THE COURT

4/29/02

2429

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that a hearing on the award of counsel fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses will be held on June 25, 2002 and June 26, 2002 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 16-A, 16th Floor, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.BY THE COURT

5/03/02

2430

Re: CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A

      AND NOW, TO WIT: This 3rd day of May, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

       ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

        It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A attached to Order

5/03/02

2431

Re: CASES LISTED ON EXHIBIT A-1

       AND NOW, TO WIT: This 3rd day of May, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1 (b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

        ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

         It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.Exhibit A-1 attached to Order

5/07/02

2432

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 7th day of May, 2002, the court having received and reviewed the attached proposed Policies and Procedures for Audit and Disposition of Matrix Compensation Claims in Audit (AAudit Procedures@), it is hereby ORDERED that any objections to said proposed Audit Procedures shall be filed with the court on or before May 21, 2002.

BY THE COURTAttached Policies and Procedures attached to Order

5/09/02

2433

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2002, after review of the objections and appeals, it is hereby ORDERED that Decision and Recommendation No.  94 of the Special Discovery Master (as to discovery relating to attorneys= fees and litigation expenses) is AFFIRMED except that the court will also permit the Non-PMC Refund Counsel to participate in the depositions of Michael Fishbein, Esquire, Kenneth Feinberg, Esquire, and John Coffee, Jr.BY THE COURT

5/09/02

2434

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of Class Counsel to Strike the April 9, 2002 Filings of Ronald R.  Benjamin (Doc.  No.  202927) (incorrectly denominated as the motion of Class Counsel to Strike the April 8, 2002 Filings of Ronald J.  Benjamin) is GRANTED in part:

       (1) the Clerk is directed to strike from the record the ABrief for Objectors@ filed April 9, 2002 (Doc.  No.  202902)

        (2) in all other respects the motion is DENIED.BY THE COURT

5/09/02

2435

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of Class Counsel to Strike Benjamin Objectors= Appeal of the Objections to Decision and Recommendation No.  94 of the Special Master (Doc.  No.  202949) is DENIED.BY THE COURT

5/09/02

2436

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that:

      (1) the motion of Objectors Elliott, Kanner, Sklute, and Cerillo, and their attorney, Ronald R.  Benjamin to preclude the testimony of John C.  Coffee, Jr.  and Kenneth R.  Feinberg (Doc.  No.  202901) is DENIED;

      (2) the cross-motion of Objectors represented by the Law Offices of Ronald R.  Benjamin for sanctions under Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc.  No. 202909) is DENIED.BY THE COURT

5/09/02

2437

Re: Ella Rhone V.  American Home Products, et al.  (98-20071)

      AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of Jones, Verras, & Freiberg, L.L.P. for leave to file Objector=s Reply (Doc.  No.  202906) is GRANTED.  Objectors shall file and serve their reply within seven business days of the date of this order.BY THE COURT

5/10/02

2438

Re: ALL ACTIONS

      AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2002, upon consideration of Plaintiffs= Management Committee=s Motion for Release and Use of Funds from the MDL 1203 Fee and Cost Account, established by Gregory Miller, Esquire, Escrow Agent, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that said Motion is GRANTED and Gregory Miller, Esquire, is directed to make payment on invoices totaling Thirty-Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty-Four Dollars and Ninety-One Cents ($37,884.91) to the PMC Fen-Phen Litigation Account, by wire transfer using the following routing number: 031-201-457 and account number: 2030000337576.BY THE COURT

5/14/02

2439

Re: Lisa A. Newcomb (f/k/a as Lisa A. Niepoetter 00-20608      AND NOW, TO WIT: Yjod 14th day of May, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between Plaintiff Lisa A. Newcomb and Defendants Wyeth and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of Wyeth, have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.  It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.

5/14/02

2440

Re: Daphne Lomax V. American Home Products 99-20191      AND NOW TO WIT: This 14th day of May it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above lited action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.



5/14/02

2441

Re: Stuart and Gina Finsilver V. American Home Products (00-20994)      AND NOW TO WIT: This 14th day of May it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

5/14/02

2442

Re: Tammy Sharpe V. American Home Products (00-20873)     AND NOW TO WIT: This 14th day of May it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of thsi Court, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED WITH prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

5/14/02

2443

Re: Sara M. Williamson V. American Home Products Corporation (01-20057)      AND NOW TO WIT: This 14th day of May it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to rule 41.1(b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

5/14/02

2444

Re: Karolee Kessler and Curtis Kessler V. American Home Products Corporation (00-20345)     AND NOW TO WIT: This 14th day of May it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejducie and without costs as to all named Defendants.

5/14/02

2445

Re: John W. Taylor and Lydia Taylor V. American Home Products (00-20053)     AND NOW TO WIT: This 14th day of May it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

5/14/02

2446

Re: Johnnie Mae Wooten V. Medeva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., American Home Products Corp., and A.H. Robins Company (99-20251)     AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2002, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.

5/16/02

2447

Re: Sheila Brown V. American Home Products (plaintiff Rick Schlosser) (99-20593)     AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of plaintiff Rick Schlosser for relief from opt-out deadline is DENIED.

5/17/02

2448

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the Decision and Recommendation No. 93 of Special Discovery Master (as to discovery requeted on fraudulent joinder) is AFFIRMED.

5/17/02

2449

Re: William F. Neil, Jr. V. American Home Products Corporation, et al (02-20085)     AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that motion of plaintiff for extension of time to provide discovery (Doc. No. 202876) is DENIED as moot.

5/20/02

2450

Re: Kimberly B. Smith V. American Home Products (98-20135)

     AND NOW TO WIT: This 20th day of May it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named defendants.

5/21/02

2451

Re: Rebecca Ackison, Carolyn Conley, Carole Slone & Roger Dale Wright (98-20579,

98-20579)

     AND NOW TO WIT: This 21st day of May, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

5/21/02

2452

Re: All Actions

     AND NOW, TO WITH, this 21st day of May, 2002, upon consideraton of the Forty-Eighth Application by Special Discvoery Master for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (03/01/02 through 03/31/02), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is hereby GRANTED and it is directed that the parties reimburse the Special Discovery Master for disbursements and compensation for legal fees in the amount of$43,269.10 for the period from 03/01/02 through 03/31/02, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.

5/21/02

2453

Re: All Actions

     AND NOW, TO WIT, this 21st day of May, 2002, upon consideration of the Sixteenth Application by Special Master to the AHP Settlement Trust for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses (03/01/02 through 03/31/02), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application if hereby GRANTED and it is driected that AHP Settlement Trust reimburse the Special Master for disbursements and compensation for leagal fees in the amount of$38,414.60 for the period from 03/01/02 through 03/31/02, in accordance with the procedure established by the Court.

5/21/02

2454

Re: All Actions - FILED UNDER SEAL

5/22/02

2455

Re: Jeorgia Harris & Timothy Harris V. American Home Products Corporation (01-21038)     AND NOW, TO WIT: This 22nd day of May, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is ORDERED that the above-referenced action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Plaintiffs Jeorgia Harris and Timothy Harris and as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.  It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed.

5/22/02

2456

Re: Lori Birkland & Gregory Birkland V. American Home Products Corporation (99-1339)     AND NOW, TO WIT: This 22nd day of May, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is ORDERED that the above-referenced action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Plaintiffs Lori Birkland and Gregory Birkland and as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.  It is FURTHER ORDERED that all cases can be marked closed

5/31/02

2457

Re: All Actions     AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2002, the Court having received no objections to the Policies and Procedures for Audit and Disposition of Matrix compensation Claims in Audit (AAudit Procedures@), it is hereby ORDERED that said Audit Procedures, attached as Exhibit A, are approved. 

6/04/02

2458

Re: All Actions

     AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that Decison and Recommendation No. 92 of Special Discovery Master (as to Non-Compliant Plaintiffs) is AFFIRMED.

     It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiffs lited on Exhibit A appear before this Court to show cause why their cases should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution on June 24, 2002 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 1A.     It is FURTHER ORDERED taht the Plaintiffs listed on Exhibit B hereto appear before this Court to show ause why they should not be sanctioned for failure to comply fully with the fact sheet requirements of Pretrial orders Nos. 22 and 1530 on June 24, 2002 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 16A.

6/04/02

2459

Re: All Actions     AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2002, upon consideration of the attached form of Fulfillment Agreement between the AHP Settlement Trust and R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company; and the Court having been advised that the terms of the attached form of Fulfillment Agreement have been reviewed by the Board of Trustees appointed by this Court;  that they were negotiated at arms= length after consideration of alternatives, including engaging others to perform the services and including having the Trust perform the activities envisioned with its own personnel; that the Board of Trustees of the Trust has resolved to enter into the Fulfillment Agreement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company on the terms set forth in the attached form of Fulfillment Agreement; that the attached form of Fulfillment Agreement has been reviewed by Liaison Counsel for the Parties pursuant to Section 10.03 of the Settlement Trust Agreement; that Liaison Counsel has stated that they have no objections to entry of an order authorizing the Trust to enter into the Fulfillment Agreement; that Section 6.01 of the Settlement Trust Agreement provides that the Board of Trustees must obtain the approval of the Court before incurring any obligation of the magnitude and duration that will likely be incurred pursuant to the form of Fulfillment Agreement attached hereto; it is hereby ORDERED that the trust may enter into a Fulfillment Agreement on the terms set forth in the attached form thereof.

6/05/02

2460

Re: All Actions     AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2002, upon consideration of the attached form of First Amendment to Screening Program Services Agreement between the AHP Settlement Trust (the Atrust@) and Crawford & Company, a Georgia corporation, the Court having been advised that the terms of the attached form of First Amendment to Screening Program Services Agreement have been reviewed by the Board of Trustees appointed by this Court; that they were negotiated at arms= length after consideration of alternatives, including engaging others to perform the services and including having the Trust perform the activities envisioned with its own personnel; that the Board of Trustees of the Trust has resolved to enter into the First Amendment to Screening Program Services Agreement with Crawford & Company on the terms set forth in the attached form of Agreement; that the attached form of First Amendment to Screening Program Services Agreement has been reviewed by Liaison Counsel for the Parties pursuant to Section 10.03 of the Settlement Trust Agreement; that Liaison Counsel for AHP stated two objections to entry of an order authorizing the Trust to enter into the First Amendment to Screening Progarm Services Agreement; that one objeciton was resolved by further negotiation and revision; that Section 6.01 of the Settlement Trust Agreement provides that the Board of Trusteees must obtain the approvalof the Court before incurring any obligation of the magnitude an duration that would be incurred pursuant to the form of First Amendement to Screening Program Services Agreement attached hereto; ...

6/05/02

2461

Re: Benjamin Cases     AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of the PMC for sequestrtion, an accounting and repaymnet of the contingent fees chrged to and paid by the clients of Ronald R. Benjamin, Esquire and Hersh & Hersh, P.C. is DENIED

6/05/02

2462

Re: Tina L. Saavedra, Donna Duerr (Donnelly), and Donzaleigh Barbee V. Wyeth Ayerst Laboratories (01-CV-20067)

     AND NOW, TO WIT, this 5th day of June, 2002, upon consideration of the motion of G. Henry Temple of Temple Law Firm, PLLC to withdraw as counsel for the Plaintiff, Donzaleigh Barbee, named in the foregoing Civil Action, IT IS ORDERED that withdrawal of cuonsel is permitted, subject to the following conditions:

6/05/02

2463

Re: Earnestine Williams V. AHP (00-20403)     AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2002, upon consideration of the motion of William Gary Holt of Gary Eubanks and Associates with withdraw as counsel for plaintiff (Doc. No. 202966), it is hereby ORDERED that the withdrawal of counsel is permitted, subject to the following conditions...

6/07/02

2464

Re: Jannette and Robert Nixon V. AHP (00-20265)

     AND NOW TO WIT: This 7th day of June, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the above listed action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to al named Defendants.

6/07/02

2465

Re: Jill Pierce V. AHP (00-20866)

     AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2002, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to AHP, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, and Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.

     Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with AHP.

     In the event that Plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, Plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only.     This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, those being AHP and Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.

5/07/02

2466

Re: Carolyn Fleming V. AHP (00-20207)

          AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2002, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to AHP, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, and Eon Labs Manufacturing, Inc, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.

     Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with AHP.

     In the event that Plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, Plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only.     This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, those being AHP and Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.   

5/07/02

2467

Re: Earnestine Williams V. AHP (00-20403)

          AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2002, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to AHP, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.

     Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with AHP.

     In the event that Plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, Plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only.     This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, those being AHP and Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.

5/07/02

2468

Re: Cheryl A. Jaggers V. AHP (00-20872)

          AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2002, it is hereby STIPULATED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Complaint in the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to AHP, Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals Incorporated with each party to bear its own costs and counsel fees.

     Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Order shall not affect any right to which Plaintiff may be entitled pursuant to the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement with AHP.

     In the event that Plaintiff re-files any claim or action arising out of the use of Pondimin or Redux, Plaintiff shall re-file such claim or action in federal court only.     This Stipulation is filed on behalf of Plaintiff and all Defendants who have appeared in the above-captioned matter, those being AHP and Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.

6/14/02

2469

Re: All Actions     AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of the Benjamin Objectors for reconsideration of PTO No. 2433 affirming Special Master Decision and Recommendation No. 94 with respect to precluding discovery into the issues of collusion and side deals between and among the PMC, Class Counsel, AHO and other counsel affecting the fee award sought herein (Doc. No. 203002) is DENIED.

6/14/02

2470

Re: Cases on Ehxiibt A

     AND NOW TO WIT: This 14th day of June, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between parties in the civil actions listed on Exhibit A hereto have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions leted on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named parties.(Amy Miller, Cheryl McFadden, Timothy Lampkin, Maribel Ruiz-Gonzales, Rosemarie Luke, Denise Beres, Joyce Rockenfield, Patricia Schnell, Jeanette White, Joy Wallace, Aaron Turner, Alton Richard, Peggy Clark, Christy Thibodeaux, Anita Brightwell, Barbara Phillips, Sharon Matherene, Catherine Parrist & Debra Fisher)

6/17/02

2471

Re: Susan McKelvey v. AHP (01-20064)

     AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that:

          (1)   the motion of plaintiff to substitute counsel (Doc. No. 202938) is GRANTED.  Amu Eskin, Esquire, of the law firm of Hersh & Hersh, 2080 Opera Plaza, 601 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA   94102, (415) 441-5544, is SUBSTITUTED as counsel of record in this matter for Jonathan B. Andry, Esquire, of the Andry Law Firm, and Glen Lerner, esquire, of Glen Lerner & Associates; and          (2) the motion of Class Counsel and the Plaintiffs= Management Committee for a rule too show cause why the motion to substitute counsel (Hersh & Hersh) shuld not be stricken (Doc. No. 202958) is DENIED.

6/17/02

2472

Re: Jabie Abercrombie and Micheline Bargiorno v. AHP (01-20102 & 01-20065)

     AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

          (1)     the motion of Jonathan B. Andry and Glen Lerner to withdraw as counsel for plaintiffs (Doc. No. 202938) is DENIED.  Counsel offer no reason for their request to withdraw from representation of plaintiffs in these cases and no provision for substitute counsel has been made.  The court therefore will not permit withdrawal at this time; and

          (2)     the motion of Class Counsel and the Plaintiffs= Management Committee for a rule to show cause why the motion to substitute counsel (Hersh & Hersh) shuld not be stricken (Doc. No. 202958) is DENIED.  Plaintiffs in the above cases have not filed a motion to substitute counsel.

6/17/02

2473

Re: Carol Bloom, Norma Jean Norse, Tammy Staten v. AHP (98-20047, 98-20377, 98-20460)     AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that Refund Counsel=s motion in limine to strike the Duggan Affidavit (Doc. No. 203022) is DENIED

6/18/02

2474

Re: Linda Farrow, et al. V. AHP (00-20798)

     AND NOW TO WIT: This 18th day of June, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties with respect to plaintiff Thomas Woodrow Hamilton in the above listed action have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Thomas Woodrow Hamilton in the above listed action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all nemed Defendants

6/18/02

2475

Re: Carla F. Lino and Allen X. Lino (99-00833)

     AND NOW, TO WIT: This 18th day of June, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above sections have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the local rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

     ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all named defendants, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.     It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case can be marked closed.

6/18/02

2476

Re: Hallie Traylor v. A.H. Robins Company (99-20273)

     The parties hereto begin in agreement as to the voluntary dismissal of all claims of the plaintiff Hallie Traylor against the defendants, A.H. Robins Company, Inc., American Home Products Corporation and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Inc., and all parties having been previously notified of the dismissal, and this Court being otherwise sufficiently advised;     IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of the plaintiff Hallie Traylor against defendants, A.H. Robins Company, Inc., American Home Products Corporation and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., be and hereby is dismised, with prejudice, and each party shall bear its own costs.

6/18/02

2477

Re: All Actions   FILED UNDER SEAL    

6/21/02

2478

Re: James Moore, Irene Saucedo, Larry Farrington & Ruth Cornett V. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories (State Court Cases)

     On June 14, 2002, Wyeth filed with this Court a Notice of Removal of four cases under the all Writs Act, namely: James Moore, et al. V Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, et al, Cause No. 17-172147-97, filed in the District Court, Tarrant County, Texas, 17th Judicial District; Irene Saucedo, et al. V. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, et al, Cause No. 17-171959-97, filed in the District Court, Tarrant County, Texas, 17th Judicial District; Larry Farrington, et al. V. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, et al, Cause No. 17-172096-97, filed in the District Court, Tarrrant County, Texas, 17th Judicial District; and Ruth Cornett, et al. V. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, et al., Cause No. 17-172584-98, filed in the District Court, Tarrant County, Texas, 17th Judicial District (together, the AState Court Actions@).  The undersigned counsel for plaintiff=s has filed in each such action a APlea in Intervention and Short Form Petition@ on behalf of a number of plaintiffs (the AIntervenors@) who apparently intend to exercise an intermediate opt-out right under the terms of the Nationwide Class Action Settlement Agreement (the ASettlement Agreement@) approved in the above-captioned action.  The parties have engaged in discussions and have consented to the entry of this Order.

     IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:..

6/24/02

2479

Re: Cindy Pattison and Aileen Hoffer     AND NOW, this 24th day of June, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion of the Pattison Objectors for leave to submit declarations in lieu of a hearing (Docl. No. 203042) is GRANTED.  Cindy Pattison and Aileen Hoffer are not required to appear at the hearing on the award of counsel fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses

6/24/02

2480

Re: ALL ACTIONS

     AND NOW, this 24th day of June, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that Decision and Recommendation No. 97 of Special Discovery Master (as to Requests for Additional Discovery Relating to the Fee Hearing) is AFFIRMED.

     It is further ORDERED that:

     (1) Mr. Becnel=s Motion for additional discovery is DENIED.

     (2) the PMC and Class Counsel=s Response in Opposition to the Becnel Objectors= Renewed Motion to Take Depositions and Motion for a Protective Order is DENIED as moot;

     (3) the Motion of the Benjamin Objectors to Compel Discovery Pursuant to PTO No. 2387, and for Expedited Additional Discovery Related to the Pending Fee Petition of the PMC/Class Counsel (Doc. No. 202975) is DENIED;

     (4) the Motion of Non-PMC Refund Counsel to Take the Deposition of Sandra L. Duggan is DENIED; and     (5) the Motion of th Plaintiffs= Management Committee and Class Counsel for a Protective Order (Re: Deposition of Sandra L. Duggan, Esquire) (Doc. No. 202984 is DENIED as moot.

6/24/02

2481

Re: Sheila Brown, Sharon Gaddie, Vivian Naugle, Quintin Layer and Joby Jackson-Reid v. AHP (99-20593)

     WHEREAS, the AHP Settlement Trust filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Expedited Discovery on June 3, 2002, against Lindley & Associates.

     WHEREAS, Wyeth filed a Joinder in the AHP Settlement Trust=s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction and a Joinder in the AHO Settlement Trut=s Motion for Expedited Discovery on June 4, 2002.

     WHEREAS, Class Counsel filed a Joinder in the AHP Settlement Trust=s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction and a Joinder in the AHP Settlemetn Trust=s Motion for Expedited Discovery on June 5, 2002.

     WHEREAS, the AHO Settlement Trust, Wyeth Class Counsel and Lindley & Associates have reached agreement concerning their disputes and Todd P. Lindley, Esquire, has executed the declaraion attached as Exhibit 1, which is incorporated by reference.

     NOW THEREFORE, this 24th day of June, 2002, upon consent of the AHP Settlement Trust, Wyeth, Class Counsel and Lindley & Associates, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

6/27/02

2482

Re: all actions

     AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that:

     (1)     Joint Petitioners shall file and serve on or before July 11, 2002 a proposed from of ordertogether with supporting brief on the issue of disbursement of any attorneys= fees held in reserve for future payment;

     (2)     Any other petitioner or objector may file and serve on or before July 25, 2002 a proposed form of order and/or brief in support of or in opposition to Joint Petitioners= proposal; and     (3)     No brief shall exceed 20 pages in length without prior leave of court.

6/27/02

2483

Re: All Actions

     AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that:

     (1)     The emergency motion of the Plaintiffs= Managment Committee and Class Counsel to strike the notice of intention to file the declaration of objector statistician and/or for the peremptory striking of the same should there be an eleventh hour filing of said declaration (Doc. No. 203047) is GRANTED; and     (2)      The emergency motion of Plaintiffs= Management Committee and Class Counsel to strike the affirmation of Ronald R. Benjamin in support of Benjamin Objectors= Evidentiary Showing at fee hearing (Doc. No. 203057) is GRANTED

6/27/02

2484

Re: All Actions

     AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that:

     (1)     the motion of Hersh & Hersh for a protective order regarding the depositions of class members represented by Hersh & Hersh (Doc. No. 202983) is DENIED as moot;

     (2)     the motion of the Plaintiffs= Management Committee and Class Counsel to compel depositions of the belatedly disclosed clients of Brian S. Riepen (Doc. No. 202988) is DENIED as moot;

     (3)     the motion of Daniel E. Becnel, Jr. to quash the notice of deposition of a representative of the Law Offices of Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., or, in the alternative, for a protective order limiting the scope of such deposition (Doc. No. 203006) is DENIED as moot;     (4)     the motion of Daniel E. Becnel, Jr. to quash the notice of deposition of Joycelyn M. Morris and Carl A. Morris (Doc. No. 203019) is DENIED as moot.

6/27/02

2485

Re: Sheila Brown v. AHP (99-20593_

     WHEREAS, Defendant Wyeth has requested an extension of time in which to respond to the Notice of Appeal and Appeal of Report and Recommendation No. 1 of Special Master (As to Motions to Enforce Paragraph 7 of Pretrial Order No. 1415) (ANotice and Appeal@) filed June 17, 2002, by Plaintiffs Marlis Ann Barth, Nancy Lynn Jones, and Joan Solometo, on the grounds that the Notice and Appeal raises issues broader that those contemplated in setting the response deadline set forth in Pretrial Order No. 2383, paragraph 11, and that Plaintiffs have consented to Wyeth=s request for such extension of time;     IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: That Wyeth has until July 17, 2002 to file any response to the Notice of Appeal and Appeal of Report and RecommendationNo. 1 of Special Master (As to Motions to Enforce Paragraph 7 of Pretrial Order No. 1415) filed June 17, 2002, by Plaintiffs Marliss Ann Barth, Nncy Lynn Jones, and Joan Solometo.

6/28/02

2486

Re: Barry L. Smyser v. AHP (99-201051)

     AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. Ot javomg beem reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

6/28/02

2487

Re: Dorothy Litchfield v. AHP (00-20022)

          AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. It having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

6/28/02

2488

Re: Patricia Hampton v. AHP (99-20248)

          AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. It having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

6/28/02

2489

Re: Gail Zeevi v. AHP (02-20125)

          AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

6/28/02

2490

Re: All Cases Listed on Exhibit A

     AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002, it having been reported that the issues between the parteis in the cifil actions listed on Ehxibit A hereto have been setled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on Exhibit A hereto are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants...

6/28/02

2491

Re: All Cases Listed on Exhibit A

          AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. It having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby

     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

 Re: H. Caton, L Whaley, B. Davis, M. Adams, D. Aughtman, D. Bearden, V. Chandler, J. Coker, B. Coleman, L. Farrow, B. Humphrey, F. Knox, M. Mack, P. Means, C. Paulk, B. Poole, C. Stoudermire, H. Tucker L. Wabington, S. Ward, B. Williamson, P. Headrick, S. Hunter, J. Hyde, C. Wyett, C. Lindsey, A. Ostendorf, D. Brown, J. Cooper, Y. Fitzpatrick, J. Griffin, D. Jones, M. Robinson & B. Williams

6/28/02

2492

Re: Betsey Katherine and Dale Spurgeon v. AHP (00-207290)

               AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. It having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

6/28/02

2493

Re: Saran Geis Janszen (01-20110)

               AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. It having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

6/28/02

2494

Re: Jimmie Hastie v. AHP (01-20008)

               AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. It having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

6/28/02

2495

Re: Thomas and Brenda Hales v. AHP (99-20423)

               AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. It having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

6/28/02

2496

Re: Christine L. Dyker v. AHP (01-20006)

               AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. It having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

6/28/02

2497

Re: Phyllis Binkowski v. AHP (00-20619)

               AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. It having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants

6/28/02

2498

Re: Fredia Amick v. AHP (00-20931)

               AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. It having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants.

6/28/02

2499

Re: Daphne Brooks v. AHP (00-20581)

               AND NOW TO WIT: This 28th day of June, 2002. It having been reported that the issues between the parties in the civil action listed above have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby     ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims in the above action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named Defendants



Please direct any questions you may have regarding the MDL-1203, or anything pertaining to this Web site, to the Plaintiffs' Management Committee at info@pmc.com.


        Home         Pretrial Orders         Special Master Info.         Fact Sheet         Filing Info.         PACER/Docket